| Revision as of 07:48, 6 July 2010 view sourceCptnono (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers26,588 edits →YouTube← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 10:05, 17 November 2010 view source Courcelles (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators434,776 edits Per e-mails with OTRS member. The | ||
| (47 intermediate revisions by 14 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| #REDIRECT ] | |||
| {{usertalkpageheader}} | |||
| For previous discussion; | |||
| * ''']''' | |||
| == 3RR == | |||
| ] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]{{#if:User talk:GaryColemanFan|  according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the ]. If you continue, '''you may be ] from editing'''. {{#if:This is my talk page, and I am entitled to delete anything I want removed. You do not have that privilege on my talk page. If it goes back again, I will report you.|The page is my talk page, and I am entitled to delete anything I want removed. You do not have that privilege on my talk page. If it goes back again, I will report you.|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 06:13, 25 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :]: "On your own user talk page, you may remove others' comments." Please do not continue posting on my talk page. I do not like receiving messages from you. I delete them. ] (]) 06:21, 25 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| Note - This user is in violation of ], ] and ] and when told he doesn't like it. He doesn't like the truth it would seem and therefore has a poor grasp of WP rules at present out of emotional attachment (I assume). Following are the things he removed; | |||
| <div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #AAAAAA; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |||
| ''Do not revert my edit on ] again. It has already been established by consensus that neither Peter Stilsbury or Dingo are notable, and you will have to prove that Dingo is Australian. As far as Stilsbury goes - you are opinion pushing against consensus. You will have to prove notability before you do anything to this page. If you revert it again, I will be taking the matter up more formally. Saying that Outback Jack was notable is the same as saying Mario Mancini, Brian Costello, Tiger Chung Lee and Don Driggers are as well. They were jobbers just as long as Stilsbury was if not longer - and where are their articles? I rest my case. <span style="border: 2px green solid;background-color:#FFFF99">'''''<font color="blue">!!</font> ]<font color="red">a</font> ] <font color="blue">!!</font>'''''</span> 11:25, 24 June 2009 (UTC)'' | |||
| ''You are not entitled to remove warnings. Lucky for you, you are right about 3RR. Stop causing trouble by ignoring WP rules (such as ], ] and ]). You would be best served leaving this alone while we wait for a third opinion. And while we;re about it, I ask for a withdrawal of the false accusations of ownership and trolling. <span style="border: 2px green solid;background-color:#FFFF99">'''''<font color="blue">!!</font> ]<font color="red">a</font> ] <font color="blue">!!</font>'''''</span> 06:17, 25 June 2009 (UTC)''</div> | |||
| I confess to being extremely frustrated and disgusted at this conduct and a third view is desperately needed. <span style="border: 2px green solid;background-color:#FFFF99">'''''<font color="blue">!!</font> ]<font color="red">a</font> ] <font color="blue">!!</font>'''''</span> 06:30, 25 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == GaryColemanFan == | |||
| My talk page is not the appropriate venue for issues with this user. Please take them elsewhere, perhaps ]. ''']''' (]) 06:33, 25 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| : Justa, I see you've been having trouble with GaryColemanFan as well. <span style="background-color:#000000">'''<font color="yellow">RICK</font>'''</span> <small><font color="blue">]</font></small> <small><font color="green">]</font></small> 01:43, 3 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| Thanks for the heads up. Keep me posted on the situation. I will return to the "discussion" this weekend. Thanks.<sup>--]]--</sup> 12:48, 21 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Peter Stilsbury == | |||
| {{Talkback|Crash Underride}} ''']]]''' 15:52, 6 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Hi there. In edit to ] you removed another user's comment. I have restored the comment, but please be more careful when adding comments to talk pages. Thanks, ♥]♥]♥]♥ 09:02, 19 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| : How did that happen?? Sorry - thanks for that. <span style="border: 2px green solid;background-color:#FFFF99">'''''<font color="blue">!!</font> ]<font color="red">a</font> ] <font color="blue">!!</font>'''''</span> 00:51, 20 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #AAAAAA; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |||
| == Wrestlemania 23 == | |||
| ''The following is concerning the Wrestlemania 23 article and who I consider to be a disruptive IP. Evidence and statement follows the two current sections.'' | |||
| === 208 IP === | |||
| Punk, don't remove stuff like you did. The talk page rules apply to all talk pages, including IP's. I agree with your warning, but don't take out the responses. Okay? ] (]) 10:59, 20 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
| : IP's could be more than one person, Mad Dog. But I'll leave it for now. <span style="border: 2px green solid;background-color:#FFFF99">'''''<font color="blue">!!</font> ]<font color="red">a</font> ] <font color="blue">!!</font>'''''</span> 11:38, 20 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::Noted. I'll keep an eye out. <sup>--]]--</sup> 00:05, 21 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ===Incidents=== | |||
| Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. {{#if:|The thread is ]. }}{{#if:|The discussion is about the topic ].}} <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you. ] (]) 09:47, 7 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| : No need for any comment. Three different users have pushed the issue to RfC. <span style="border: 2px green solid;background-color:#FFFF99">'''''<font color="blue">!!</font> ]<font color="red">a</font> ] <font color="blue">!!</font>'''''</span> 22:13, 7 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ===<font color="purple">Statement</font>=== | |||
| It is quite clear that the individual using the two IP's of 208.120.153.110 and 208.120.152.75 is a tetentious editor, trying to use his own interpretation of policy to push an agenda of primarily including a supposed controversy over the attendance figure at Wrestlemania 23. Despite being pointed to a number of policies, he has tried to twist them to the point of reversing their application in order to support his view rather than that clearly supported by established reliable sources and verified accordingly also. Even a balanced footnote about the minor issue isn't good enough for him. As far as this editor is concerned, there is a huge issue over the correct attendance figure - and he is yet to provide a verified and reliable source that actually says there is a major controversy. | |||
| It's odd and rather suspicious that 208 has - in a seemingly sarcastic way - reversed his position just recently. | |||
| I will be adding examples shortly. <span style="border: 2px green solid;background-color:#FFFF99">'''''<font color="blue">!!</font> ]<font color="red">a</font> ] <font color="blue">!!</font>'''''</span> 07:19, 9 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ===Continuous Arguments=== | |||
| Don't you think that this as gone on long enough? Why do you think he continues to argue?--] ] 03:12, 12 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| : Because he won't take "no" for an answer. I'm on the verge of taking this to ANI to be honest. <span style="border: 2px green solid;background-color:#FFFF99">'''''<font color="blue">!!</font> ]<font color="red">a</font> ] <font color="blue">!!</font>'''''</span> 06:20, 12 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| Go to ANI it's probably the best idea.--] ] 21:21, 12 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ===It's Over!=== | |||
| Thankfully, the IP has been dealt with so the matter is closed. <span style="border: 2px green solid;background-color:#FFFF99">'''''<font color="blue">!!</font> ]<font color="red">a</font> ] <font color="blue">!!</font>'''''</span> 01:25, 18 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| </div> | |||
| == GCF again! == | |||
| Boy! I put this on his talk page after I removed two dead links from the article on Bill Verna and he put them back making the accusation I quoted. | |||
| <font color="red">'''No more!'''<br> | |||
| You said; "but for you to try to portray an article that you have campaigned repeatedly to have deleted as being written without sources is disingenuous at best" | |||
| That is completely untrue and should be withdrawn. I was not attacking the article at all. I was merely removing dead links, which I have done to at least one other article (]). I didn't even touch the content, which proves your assertion not just wrong but biased against me. Stop it, please.</font> | |||
| And he removed it and said "No" (he won't withdraw it) and accused me of trolling! | |||
| This guy is nothing but trouble when he doesn't get his own way! <span style="border: 2px green solid;background-color:#FFFF99">'''''<font color="blue">!!</font> ]<font color="red">a</font> ] <font color="blue">!!</font>'''''</span> 03:54, 4 March 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| That's most likely the same person, but even if it is not, the problem that got ] blocked remained, so I have blocked this account. Thanks for point this out. '''<font face="Arial"><font color="#FF7133">Maxim</font><sub><small>]</small></sub></font>''' 14:33, 15 March 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Follow up on "World Wrestling Entertainment is.... FAKE?" == | |||
| Just a quick follow up on the page disruption notice | |||
| See ]. <sup>--]]--</sup> 05:30, 18 March 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Question == | |||
| Alex Riley and The Usos are the new champs at FCW, what wrestling website can be use as offical news?--] (]) 22:51, 23 March 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :Is 411mania.com good?--] (]) 16:34, 25 March 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ==Speedy deletion tag removal== | |||
| As I said, sorry if I was acting incorrectly. But doesn't the tag state: | |||
| ''If this article does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, or you intend to fix it, please remove this notice, but do not remove this notice from pages that you have created yourself'' | |||
| I don't think the article meets the criteria for speedy deletion, and added more references intended to demonstrate notability. I am also not the creator of the article. You tell me, ''"Do not remove speedy deletion tags under any circumstances"'', but it appears that the notice provides the circumstances under which it should be removed? If I misread the notice or its intent, what are the "instructions in contesting the tag"? The link you provided me seems to reinforce my reading: ''"The creator of a page may not remove a Speedy Delete tag from it. Only an editor who is not the creator of a page may do so."'' | |||
| So again, what is the appropriate channel to contest the speedy deletion tag? --] (]) 00:06, 14 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :He was incorrect. Anyone besides the author may remove a db tag. I will almost always revert an unexplained removal but you explained why you removed the tag when you removed it. I believe that an assertion of notability was at least made with the award so I removed the tag just now. My guess is that the editor got a CSD tag confused with an AfD tag. ]'''<sup>]</sup> 02:34, 14 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :: No I reverted it because I believe the IP is the article creator. There was no confusion. The first reversion by OlYeller was treated as pushing that edit and not an original action. The last one however was clearly an original action as indicated. So now it has to go to AfD. <span style="border: 2px green solid;background-color:#FFFF99">'''''<font color="blue">!!</font> ]<font color="red">a</font> ] <font color="blue">!!</font>'''''</span> 04:27, 14 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :::I see you've nominated the article for AfD. You claim in the AfD that "two users claim that the one minor change (the Shimmer championship) changes matters" which isn't the case. Besides the fact that you lied about the checkuser and that you're now claiming that the IP ''is'' another user, the speedy was removed because the awards are an assertion of notability, not that the awards make her notable. Forgiving that, I worry that someone who has been around Misplaced Pages as long as you would accuse someone of being a sockpuppet without any real proof, claim to have started a checkuser when in fact you didn't, and incorrectly stated that db tags may not be removed at all and even issued a warning to a new user. Is this how you regularly operate? ]'''<sup>]</sup> 04:25, 14 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :::: No it's not the way I operate and I resent the implication. The woman is not notable and I will always work to remove not notable articles in the wrestling area. I have stated that "I believe" which can not be constituted as a direct accusation. <span style="border: 2px green solid;background-color:#FFFF99">'''''<font color="blue">!!</font> ]<font color="red">a</font> ] <font color="blue">!!</font>'''''</span> 04:29, 14 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :::::Ok, I assume that you forgot about edit summary or maybe ran out of room? That is a direct accusation, there's no denying that. ]'''<sup>]</sup> 04:34, 14 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :::::: I was in abbreviation mode with that. You have to cut it short in the edit summary. <span style="border: 2px green solid;background-color:#FFFF99">'''''<font color="blue">!!</font> ]<font color="red">a</font> ] <font color="blue">!!</font>'''''</span> 04:36, 14 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Response == | |||
| Oh, okay. Thanks for letting me know. But let clear heads prevail. <span style="background:black"><span style="color:red">Mr. C.C.</span><sup>]</sup><sub>]</sub></span> 23:27, 14 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :I was told you might be talking about the person that you have an issue with to other members of Misplaced Pages. If that is true and I see it or find out about it, then I won't hesitate to bring up both of your names on the noticeboards. So just avoid each other if possible. It's not worth being blocked over. <span style="background:black"><span style="color:red">Mr. C.C.</span><sup>]</sup><sub>]</sub></span> 05:19, 20 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thanks for letting me know. <span style="background:black"><span style="color:red">Mr. C.C.</span><sup>]</sup><sub>]</sub></span> 16:20, 20 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ==]== | |||
| It is right that the ring announcer introduces her as Eve Torres, but that is a mistake by the ring announcer. Jerry Lawler and Michael Cole call her by her ring name "Eve". | |||
| You can see on http://www.wwe.com/superstars/raw/eve and http://www.wwe.com/inside/titlehistory/divas/ that her ring name is simply "Eve". So I take WWE.com as a reliable source and not the ring announcer. | |||
| --] (]) 09:34, 30 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
| I'd say Eve Torres and Eve should be bolded as a ring name. Or we could bring this to ].--] ] 19:17, 2 May 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Spoilers == | |||
| Just thought I'd let you know that I'm gonna go ahead with the third opinion just to cut the time of going back and forth on this almost non-issue, just thought you'd be interested in knowing this. <font color="Fuchsia">]</font> (]) <sup>- Afkatk</sup> 11:16, 7 May 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Response == | |||
| I received some message from you just now. What exactly are you trying to say? Are you saying the PG rating is not notable? Did anyone prove that the WWE Universe was notable enough for its own subsection? It seems that certain editors just want to revert the PG change for some covert reason. | |||
| Forget the laziness. How about you do something constructive? I've provided links, and this issue has been discussed on the Pro wreslting talk page, but still you want to deny its an issue. | |||
| ::Tell me, '''why do you think it's not notable'''? | |||
| --] ] 18:13, 21 May 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :You never answered my question, and you decided to get personal instead of doing something constructive. I'll remind you that I cited an article by the WWE that was published on WWE.com about the Change in programming. I can see you also didn't read the WikiProject Pro Wrestling Talk page, because I participated with the group there and there was no set consensus. Even 3bulletproof16, who was a major naysayer about including it, later admitted that the change in programming was notable enough for mention. | |||
| I can see you enjoy arguing without listening. For that reason, this conversation is over. | |||
| --] ] 21:46, 21 May 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Madison Eagles == | |||
| I've declined the speedy for Madison Eagles because it's radically different from the deleted version — the old one had just five citations, not the twenty-eight of the current version, and the current version is far larger and longer than the deleted version. ] (]) 13:38, 15 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == June 2010 == | |||
| Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. {{#if:WP:SNOW - justification for collapsing discussion?|The thread is ]. }}{{#if:|The discussion is about the topic {{#ifexist:]|]|{{{1}}}}}.}} <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you. ---- ''''']'''''/]|]\ 14:53, 15 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Request for mediation of World Wrestling Entertainment == | |||
| <!---From WP:Requests for mediation/OpenNote--->A request for ] of the dispute relating to ] was recently filed. As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. The process of ] is entirely voluntary and focuses exclusively on the content issues over which there is disagreement. Please review the ] and the ] and then indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you would agree to participate. Discussion relating to the mediation request welcome at the case talk page.<p>Thank you, ] 11:47, 23 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
| *'''STATEMENT:''' I won't be participating due to Screwball being disruptive and opinion pushing. I've had enough of him and have withdrawn from speaking to him per ]. I will however be reverting any further attempt to insert material that does not back up his point - which means at this point every attempt he makes. I fully expect him to cop a long term ban if he keeps up his present conduct. He thinks he's above board and it's frustrating when you are dealing with a person who wilfully doesn't pay attention to what's really going on. <span style="border: 2px green solid;background-color:#FFFF99">'''''<font color="blue">!!</font> ]<font color="red">a</font> ] <font color="blue">!!</font>'''''</span> 22:14, 24 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::Hi Justa Punk, would you be able to visit the mediation page and indicate that you decline to participate in this mediation? If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Thanks. ] (]) 00:23, 2 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| a) My name's not "Nick" so please don't ever call me that. b) The fact that the author removed the prod is '''not''' a valid reason to re-instate the tag. Read ], particularly "If anyone, including the article creator, removes a <nowiki>{{prod}}</nowiki> tag from an article, do not replace it, even if the tag was apparently removed in bad faith". It's even bolded there for you. If you want the articles deleted now that the prods were contested, take them to ] instead of violating policy. ♥]♥]♥]♥ 02:40, 29 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :Really? It's been there ever since I can remember, at least two years if not more. It's only speedy tags that "hang on" applies to if my recollection serves me right. ♥]♥]♥]♥ 21:47, 29 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ==Request for mediation rejected== | |||
| The ] concerning World Wrestling Entertainment, to which you were listed as a party, has been ]. An explanation of why it has not been possible to allow this dispute to proceed to mediation is provided at the ] (which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time). Queries on the rejection of this dispute can be directed to the ] or e-mailed to the ].<p>For the Mediation Committee, ] 17:15, 4 July 2010 (UTC)<br/><span style="font-size: 88%;">(This message delivered by ], an automated bot account ] by the ] to perform case management.)</span> | |||
| == Re: your so-called "warning" == | |||
| "Do not revert sourced material". Hilarious. What exactly are you doing? We both have sources, the difference is yours is a copyrighted video that is illegally hosted. I've brought up the issue at ], and I'm not going to edit war with you over this. ♥]♥]♥]♥ 03:30, 6 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ==YouTube== | |||
| ]. Linking to that particular video from ] is contributory copyright infringement. Continuing to insert it is not OK. Consider using the {{tl|cite episode}} template without a link.] (]) 05:04, 6 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :True. Links to youtube containing copyrighted material is prohibited per ]. The best thing to do is simply cite the episode. No worries and don't edit war. Talk it out with Nici, she's good people. <sup>--]]--</sup> 07:25, 6 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::] I assume you understand the concern but you name was also brought up due to the recent revert.] (]) 07:48, 6 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 10:05, 17 November 2010
Redirect to: