| Revision as of 21:54, 5 December 2010 editVanished user uih38riiw4hjlsd (talk | contribs)16,993 edits →[]<!--REMOVE THIS ASTERISK WHEN YOU REVIEW.-->*: Fixing categories for editor review using AWB← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:36, 28 February 2011 edit undoFetchcomms (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users41,593 edits revNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ===] |
===]=== | ||
| {{user2|Eclipsed}} Greetings, pre-thanks for the review. <span style="color:#000000;background:#FFFFFF"> ] ] </span> 16:42, 4 November 2010 (UTC) | {{user2|Eclipsed}} Greetings, pre-thanks for the review. <span style="color:#000000;background:#FFFFFF"> ] ] </span> 16:42, 4 November 2010 (UTC) | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| ''' Reviews ''' | ''' Reviews ''' | ||
| *Sorry for the quick and long overdue review. I think you've handled the paid editing/COI debate very well and kept your cool. You've certainly approached it from a pretty good angle, and although our viewpoints may differ, I don't really see any problem with your continued development of neutral, sourced content. <span style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:80%;">'''/]]]'''</span> 03:36, 28 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
| {{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAMEE}}|Misplaced Pages:Editor review/Editor-reviewsubst||*<!-- Remove the ASTERISK next to the username (at the top) and this TAG when you review this user --> {{Not yet reviewed}}}} | |||
| ] | ] | ||
Revision as of 03:36, 28 February 2011
Eclipsed
Eclipsed (talk · contribs · count) Greetings, pre-thanks for the review. Eclipsed ¤ 16:42, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
Questions
- What are your primary contributions to Misplaced Pages? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?
- Primary contribs: random editing, creating pages, learning WP:AWB, active in WP:Article Incubator, adopted a few new users, and recently back from a looong wikibreak
- Have you been in editing disputes or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future? If you have never been in an editing dispute, explain how you would respond to one.
- Nothing stressful, as I recall. If an editing dispute did happen, I'd assume good faith, and try to do casual discussions, or get a 3rd opinion. If that didn't work, then go to some sort of RfC-like discussion, but I'm not sure.
Reviews
- Sorry for the quick and long overdue review. I think you've handled the paid editing/COI debate very well and kept your cool. You've certainly approached it from a pretty good angle, and although our viewpoints may differ, I don't really see any problem with your continued development of neutral, sourced content. /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 03:36, 28 February 2011 (UTC)