| Revision as of 23:23, 15 April 2011 editMathsci (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers66,107 edits →Ludwigs2 on AE ArbCom: edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:50, 16 April 2011 edit undoNuclearWarfare (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators83,665 edits →redactions: I go offline for 24 hours...Next edit → | ||
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
| :This request seems to be highly disruptive. ] (]) 19:54, 15 April 2011 (UTC) | :This request seems to be highly disruptive. ] (]) 19:54, 15 April 2011 (UTC) | ||
| :@Ludwigs2: Enough with this "slander" nonsense. I don't care if Mathsci is saying that every single edit you have made to Misplaced Pages has been disruptive and destructive; you bringing it up over and over again is not helpful in the slightest. I'm sure that every arbitrator is aware right now that you don't like Mathsci and vice-versa, and will take what you two say about each other with an ] of salt.<p>@Mathsci: Would you be willing to withdraw from the threads without any recognition of fault? Your presence isn't really ''as'' "necessary" to the case as Ludwigs2's presence is, and it might help matters a bit. '''<font color="navy">]</font>''' ''(<font color="green">]</font>)'' 18:50, 16 April 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 18:50, 16 April 2011
I hold the SUL account for NuclearWarfare
| |||||||||||||||||
| This is NuclearWarfare's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
|
Wait! Are you here because your article was speedy deleted? Click here before leaving a message to find out why. |
 Archives | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 3 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Ludwigs2 on AE ArbCom
Hi NW. I am not going to respond to Ludwigs2's continued claims of "slander" on the talk page of the proposed decision, written after you made your request to disengage. Apparently Ludwigs2 now includes all my contributions on the evidence page and workshop page as part of the "slander". But diffs are diffs, that is the wiki way. As far as I am aware I have conducted myself properly in the AE case and the Noleander case. Regards, Mathsci (talk) 17:08, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
- slander is slander, throwing in random defamatory material from over two years ago, or from completely unrelated issues, does not constitute valid evidence. --Ludwigs2 18:35, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
After you made your request to disengage, Ludwigs2 ignored it here in replying directly to me after your request, which he must have read. The edit summary is worse than the comment: "slander is slander - it doesn't matter if you put a pretty pink bow in its hair, it's still an ugly business." He than continued with thinly veiled personal attacks and uncivil language here. He added another thinly veiled personal attack here , again repeating substantiated claims of slander. From my perspective, Ludwigs2 has ignored your warning. He appears to be more disruptive than he was on the workshop page. I have no idea why he is editing like this. Mathsci (talk) 20:57, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
redactions
NW - if you are not going to redact Mathsci's posts to that thread, please let me know explicitly so that I can ask the other clerk to do so (or if necessary, bring the issue up with the drafting arbiters). thanks. --Ludwigs2 18:32, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
- This request seems to be highly disruptive. Mathsci (talk) 19:54, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
- @Ludwigs2: Enough with this "slander" nonsense. I don't care if Mathsci is saying that every single edit you have made to Misplaced Pages has been disruptive and destructive; you bringing it up over and over again is not helpful in the slightest. I'm sure that every arbitrator is aware right now that you don't like Mathsci and vice-versa, and will take what you two say about each other with an appropriate amount of salt.
@Mathsci: Would you be willing to withdraw from the threads without any recognition of fault? Your presence isn't really as "necessary" to the case as Ludwigs2's presence is, and it might help matters a bit. NW (Talk) 18:50, 16 April 2011 (UTC)