Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 17:11, 14 March 2006

Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end. I will respond on your talk page unless you request otherwise.
Start a new talk topic.

Archives: May-November 2005 - December 8-24, 2005 - Dec 28, 2005 - Jan 22, 2006 - January 23-February 11, 2006 - February 11-27, 2006 - February 28-March 10, 2006

How do you respond so quickly to vandilism? 67.162.165.242 00:36, 14 March 2006 (UTC) YOLT

rec.sport.pro-wrestling

Master Of RSPW is a suspected sockpuppet of Chadbryant, which in itself makes the account questionable. However, that aside, the changes this person has made to rec.sport.pro-wrestling are both invalid and inaccurate, and were decided lonnnng ago by Misplaced Pages administrators to be of inappropriate use to the entry, due to their lack of content, amount of opinionated material, amount of personal attacks, and invalid outside resources used as internal and external links. All I am attempting to do is ensure that this version is NOT used for rec.sport.pro-wrestling. If this means that by Misplaced Pages definition on a technicality I am in violation of the Misplaced Pages three-revert rule, then I apologize. What you must realize is that the LAST time this occurred, Mr. Bryant was behind it as well. It is, in fact, his version which was declared essentially null and void by Misplaced Pages administrators; thus, it comes as no surprise that his sockpuppet...excuse me, SUSPECTED sockpuppet Master Of RSPW is causing trouble through this entry. This is not the first time Mr. Bryant OR Master Of RSPW has done this, nor, I suspect, shall it be the last, given the extensive abusive behavior of both (or the one, depending on your point of view) parties/party. I do, however, apologize if it seems that I am being a "vandal" or "sockpuppet" or whatever lame excuse either one of those parties is attempting to use to justify their (invalid) revertings. It is mostly an edit war that certain individuals seem to prefer to engage in with the intent of causing trouble. --FARVA 05:40, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

• I concur with the above post. It is rather obvious that Chadbryant (talk · contribs) and Master Of RSPW (talk · contribs) are one and the same (see each user's contribs for circumstantial proof), despite both user's claims to the opposite. Mr. Bryant's edits, using both accounts, are rather frivilous and go against the consensus of other users, as in the article for Nashville Municipal Auditorium. --Zpb52 09:48, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

You concur with a fellow Southerner? What a shock! You do know that FARVA is the "DickWitham" troll that has been blocked under dozens of screen names for abuse, right? Given the fact that you're most likely the anonymous Alabaman who vandalized my user page, I'm not really sure you care about the truth, or being aligned with the right side. Master Of RSPW 16:17, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

I believe the above comments speak for themselves. Master Of RSPW, AKA Chadbryant, has no intention of ever making a positive contribution to wikipedia. His veiled insults/personal attacks above are proof positive of this, and his paranoia fits in with Chadbryant's behavior as well (". . . care about the truth . . . "being aligned with the right side"). The sooner both of them are blocked and banned, the better. --FARVA 07:43, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

Microsoft Fingerprint

Why deleted you Microsoft Fingerprint 6 March . The article provided useful information. 1() 07:05, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

Master of RSPW

Despite your warning on his talk page, User:Master Of RSPW continues to revert the entry for rec.sport.pro-wrestling.

] ] ] ] ]

Since this user is the sockpuppet of User:Chadbryant, I expect more edits to continue. TruthCrusader 16:34, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

The checkuser needs to be run ASAP. You need to be proven wrong and silenced. Master Of RSPW 16:37, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

YOU need to stop vandalising user pages, reverting to incorrect articles, adding personal insults and incivility to edit comments and user pages, and really just a whole host of other bad behavior. Let he who is without a three meat pizza throw the first stone. --FARVA 07:50, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

Would you folks mind taking this somewhere other than my user talk page, please? (ESkog) 08:26, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

Bechna.com

This site is among the top 5 classifieds sites in India. Some of the others are portals that have classifieds in India like rediff.com, sulekha.com and timesclassifieds.com. It is in the top 50,000 ranking in Alexa and ranked 49th in the classifieds category by ranking.com Similar to craigslist and unlike the other classifieds sites in India, bechna is a pure classifieds site. Requesting the deleting msg be removed. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bluesargam (talk • contribs) 02:09, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

BBIH

You blocked this user for a month for bo good reason. It was not actually meant in a bad-faith way that I should show you who is boss, infact, you have proven to be a life-ruiner tonight. I demand the unblocking of that account as I mean to make good edits with it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 680 (talk • contribs) 03:07, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

I don't know; assuming he promises to behave himself (and does in the interim), I don't see why he can't be unblocked in a couple weeks. One would, however, have to keep an eye on him. —BorgHunter (talk) 03:52, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

Infact, the account should be unblocked now. I hope you are considering it. (and note also, I am not trolling with the socks, infact I never am, and I am a perfectly good contributor.}Elcik 03:56, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

OK, so, is it time to remove the block.Dirdfo 04:00, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

I have to use socks to communicate. Stop blocking them. Remove the block on BBIH by March 16.Roving raider 04:06, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

a) You do not have to use socks to communicate. You can e-mail an admin.

b) Being insulting ("you have proven to be a life-ruiner tonight"), making demands, and issuing ultimatums are not good ways to get yourself unblocked.

Hbackman 05:51, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

Deleted Streamlight article

On March 6 you deleted the article Streamlight: .

Could you please undelete that or let's discuss the problem with the article? There are many other similar articles on flashlight companies, watch companies, etc. If there's some advertising or spam problem, I'll be happy to fix that. I have no association with the company, flashlights are just a hobby. Streamlight is probably the most notable flashlight manufacturer outside Maglite, so I was surprised to see it deleted. Joema 13:26, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

My RFA

Thanks for participating in my RfA. It passed with a final tally of 98/13/10, just two short of making WP:100. If you need my help with anything, don't hesitate to ask.

Naconkantari e|t||c|m 23:03, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

Input Appreciated

I'd much appreciate your input in the very demoralizing (for me) flame war that has developed between myself an another user which is currently being played out on WP:PAIN. This user piled on your comment on my talk page in what I felt was an unnecessary as well as unnecessarily hostile fashion, Then I objected and it has been downhill from there. I've always admired your civility in even the most heated situations but I see that that trait is far from universal among the veteran users of this site. I find this whole thing very painful and frankly it has led me to wonder whether there is any point in further contributions here. This and the ongoing, pointless confrontations in naked short selling have been draining and this is, for me, something resembling the "last straw." Anyway, thanks for listening. A response on this talk page would be appreciated.--Tomstoner 18:58, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

Re: User talk:152.163.100.9 anon and deletions

rv - the warnings were removed by Pathoschild as very very old

you assertions that User:Pathoschild deleted those entries because they are very very old is mistaken for two reason:

1) they were repeatedly deleted by the anon himself 15 February 2006

2) they are not "very very old"--the last entry was 14 feb, 2006 and the deletions occured 8 days later on feb 22, 2006.

We have a repeated vandal which you are shielding. Deleting vandalism notices is considered vandalism. Travb 23:04, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

I am not calling you a vandal, just explaining policy in case you are not familar with it. My mistake, you are correct, I am sorry Pathoschild did delete those warnings this time. I have followed this particular aol vandal for two months, and was just in the process of writing up a vandalism in progress because this user deleted all the messages on three AOL anon talk pages.

I will talk to User:Pathoschild about his edits, and if I can archive those warnings. I find if ironic that User:Pathoschild did what the vandal attempted to do not 7 days before 15 February 2006

--delete all of the warning entries.Travb 23:21, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

Zmmz

I've told Zmmz that if you're willing to go along with it, I'd unblock him on the condition that he not edit Persian people for the duration of your 48-hour block. This would allow him to participate in the ongoing mediation of that page on the talk page. However, I'll only do this if you sign on, so let me know. Thanks. Chick Bowen 00:09, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

OK, good. I'm curious to see what he says. Thanks. Chick Bowen 00:17, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

I do NOT vandalize.

Please read the comments in my edit before accusing me of vandalizing.

I was doing the user a favour and archiving his talk page. If you had looked at the comment I left in the edit (though I left no edit summary), you would have noticed this. Please assume good faith.

I certainly do not vandalize. I revert vandalism whenever/whereever I see it. - File:Ottawa flag.png nathanrdotcom 01:33, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

Editing the homosexuality comment

"Others, such as the United States, purge them from the force in the belief that they are a threat"

"Others, such as the United States, purge them from the force in the belief that they are demonstrating their homosexual tendencies."

How is that "vandalism" it is more specific and direct. How is this nonsense, ESkog? More specifically, why don't we specify how the military views homosexuals as a threat, a threat to what, exactly? And why do we have to compare the military's policy of "Don't ask, don't tell" (which doesn't allow open homosexuals to participate in the military) to the Knights Templar which were killed? How is this negative attitude similar to the "Don't ask, don't tell" policy which actually allows homosexuals to participate in the military as long as they don't openly demonstrate their sexual orientation?

71.9.11.95 04:35, 14 March 2006 (UTC)Anonymous

Creed

From the looks of your "contribution" page you spend on average ~2 minutes deciding to revert someone's edits. I certainly spent more time researching and making my contribution to the creed article than you did deciding to revert it. I know I'm a bit of a newbie here, and maybe it's not my place to give you advice on what you do on wikipedia, but try to realize that reverting people contributions without discussion (and if you read the discussion you would have realized that people had requested info on the 311 vs creed stuff) does not help anything. It only creates hard feelings and revert wars. Thanks for wasting my time :( Rm999 04:41, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for your help

With converting Big XII and Big Twelve--> Big 12 per the conference's style guide. Johntex\ 17:02, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

User:201.215.232.5 (Adana revert war)

Hi, please see WP:AN3#User:201.215.232.5, apparently a new incarnation of the anon you blocked last night. Thanks! Lukas 17:11, 14 March 2006 (UTC)