Misplaced Pages

User talk:ArmanJan: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 00:13, 8 March 2006 editKashk (talk | contribs)4,562 edits Salam← Previous edit Revision as of 06:59, 19 March 2006 edit undoTony Sidaway (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers81,722 edits Vandalism of []Next edit →
Line 10: Line 10:


If you need any info/help, please contact me. If you need any info/help, please contact me.

==Vandalism of ]==
Please examine these two edits that you performed on ]: . In the first you removed some information about the UNHCR and Amnesty's reports about the redeployment of Baijis to enforce Islamic codes. This was well sourced information and should not be removed without good reason--you gave no reason except an edit summary saying "Removed unrelated info". In the second edit, you removed it again, with the edit summary "Info without source removed". This is unacceptable. Removal of this information will be treated as vandalism and you will be blocked if you continue. --] 06:59, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 06:59, 19 March 2006


Salam

We need your help brother! Iranian articles are being attacked.

Please see Misplaced Pages:Iranian Wikipedians' notice board, read it carefully, especially about the Anti-Iranian wikipedians.

Then please cast your vote on: Misplaced Pages:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-03-02 Persian people and Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/Aucaman.

If you need any info/help, please contact me.

Vandalism of Basij

Please examine these two edits that you performed on Basij: . In the first you removed some information about the UNHCR and Amnesty's reports about the redeployment of Baijis to enforce Islamic codes. This was well sourced information and should not be removed without good reason--you gave no reason except an edit summary saying "Removed unrelated info". In the second edit, you removed it again, with the edit summary "Info without source removed". This is unacceptable. Removal of this information will be treated as vandalism and you will be blocked if you continue. --Tony Sidaway 06:59, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

User talk:ArmanJan: Difference between revisions Add topic