Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Yeshiva Gedola of Carteret: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 22:01, 31 August 2011 editThe Determinator (talk | contribs)2,893 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 22:18, 31 August 2011 edit undoThe Determinator (talk | contribs)2,893 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 12: Line 12:
::Thanks ], Did you fix the nomination? I'm sorta new and still learning my way around Misplaced Pages. ] (]) 01:30, 26 August 2011 (UTC) ::Thanks ], Did you fix the nomination? I'm sorta new and still learning my way around Misplaced Pages. ] (]) 01:30, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
:::Hmm CapMan, for a "new" editor (only joined August 15th, not even two weeks !!!) you sure are busy running to delete articles about Orthodox Judaism and Jews, such as when you were slapped down with a '''Speedy Keep''' at ] and now this article. Take a few deep breaths, step back, try to engage other editors in fair discussions first, go to their talk pages, or go to ] and get the expert views of editors there. This is a long term work in progress. That will help you out. Raise your level of ] and ] and then you can take the lunge at deleting articles that are bound to raise controversy which you should try to avoid. ] (]) 07:24, 31 August 2011 (UTC) :::Hmm CapMan, for a "new" editor (only joined August 15th, not even two weeks !!!) you sure are busy running to delete articles about Orthodox Judaism and Jews, such as when you were slapped down with a '''Speedy Keep''' at ] and now this article. Take a few deep breaths, step back, try to engage other editors in fair discussions first, go to their talk pages, or go to ] and get the expert views of editors there. This is a long term work in progress. That will help you out. Raise your level of ] and ] and then you can take the lunge at deleting articles that are bound to raise controversy which you should try to avoid. ] (]) 07:24, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
::::Yes I am new, and I've admitted this, as for the ] I admit I didn't do enough research there weren't enough references listed on the pages, it pointed out to me later how I should do a proper search on this. I am still new and learning. I will take your helpful tips, I appreciate you guidance. FYI, I have also nominated non-orthodox articles for deletion with 1 being deleted another 1 prodded and several other where I have tagged for needed references and if there are no reference is a reasonable amount of time they too will be nominated for deletion <ref>http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Gurudwara_Dashmesh_Darbar_Sahib_%28New_Jersey%29</ref> ] (]) 22:17, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
*'''Keep''', well-written article that needs more citations about a notable ] in New Jersey. ] (]) 10:58, 25 August 2011 (UTC) *'''Keep''', well-written article that needs more citations about a notable ] in New Jersey. ] (]) 10:58, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
::IZAK, I've been watching this article and trying to improve it for at least 2 years. I've tried finding sources many time and come up with nothing. If you can share some ] that would be great but otherwise, the nominator is correct and the article should go. ] (]) 14:32, 25 August 2011 (UTC) ::IZAK, I've been watching this article and trying to improve it for at least 2 years. I've tried finding sources many time and come up with nothing. If you can share some ] that would be great but otherwise, the nominator is correct and the article should go. ] (]) 14:32, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:18, 31 August 2011

Yeshiva Gedola of Carteret

Yeshiva Gedola of Carteret (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable no real references in the articles and it has been marked as such for years. CapMan07008 (talk) 21:52, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:42, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:42, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:42, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
Delete non-notable private college, with an article that reads like a prospectus. --Simple Bob (Talk) 13:49, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
Thanks IZAK, Did you fix the nomination? I'm sorta new and still learning my way around Misplaced Pages. CapMan07008 (talk) 01:30, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
Hmm CapMan, for a "new" editor (only joined August 15th, not even two weeks !!!) you sure are busy running to delete articles about Orthodox Judaism and Jews, such as when you were slapped down with a Speedy Keep at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Aharon Kotler and now this article. Take a few deep breaths, step back, try to engage other editors in fair discussions first, go to their talk pages, or go to WP:TALKJUDAISM and get the expert views of editors there. This is a long term work in progress. That will help you out. Raise your level of WP:AGF and WP:NPOV and then you can take the lunge at deleting articles that are bound to raise controversy which you should try to avoid. IZAK (talk) 07:24, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
Yes I am new, and I've admitted this, as for the Aharon Kotler I admit I didn't do enough research there weren't enough references listed on the pages, it pointed out to me later how I should do a proper search on this. I am still new and learning. I will take your helpful tips, I appreciate you guidance. FYI, I have also nominated non-orthodox articles for deletion with 1 being deleted another 1 prodded and several other where I have tagged for needed references and if there are no reference is a reasonable amount of time they too will be nominated for deletion CapMan07008 (talk) 22:17, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
IZAK, I've been watching this article and trying to improve it for at least 2 years. I've tried finding sources many time and come up with nothing. If you can share some WP:RS that would be great but otherwise, the nominator is correct and the article should go. Joe407 (talk) 14:32, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
Well that opinion is currently changing - see Jimbo Wales talk page, where he says a statement by him on this topic was misconstrued and that in fact schools are not inherently notable. --Simple Bob (Talk) 06:38, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
I've seen no evidence that opinion is actually changing. Whether this kind of school falls in the mainstream of the years of AfD consensus may be another matter, as this is a specialty school of unclear size.--Milowent 18:03, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
I never heard of Jimbo Wales (what a silly name anyway) and don't give a flying shit what he has to say.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 02:08, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
He's nobody special, he just THE FOUNDER OF WIKIPEDIA, lol... CapMan07008 (talk) 15:07, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
  • Keep Specialized high schools and colleges are considered notable. The distinction is between colleges and trade schools. A theological institute ins not a trade school--its a specialized academic institution. Size is irrelevant. DGG ( talk ) 03:44, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
Even If we ignore size, it still has no WP:RS CapMan07008 (talk) 21:54, 29 August 2011 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein  05:49, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

  1. http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Gurudwara_Dashmesh_Darbar_Sahib_%28New_Jersey%29
Categories:
Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Yeshiva Gedola of Carteret: Difference between revisions Add topic