Misplaced Pages

User talk:Eloquence: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 08:48, 27 September 2011 editEloquence (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users17,329 edits test: new WikiLove message← Previous edit Revision as of 08:48, 27 September 2011 edit undoEloquence (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users17,329 editsm Reverted edits by Eloquence (talk) to last version by ExtransitNext edit →
Line 33: Line 33:
: Thanks for engaging extensively with the subject matter at hand and reaching an informed, thoughtful conclusion.--]] 02:57, 27 September 2011 (UTC) : Thanks for engaging extensively with the subject matter at hand and reaching an informed, thoughtful conclusion.--]] 02:57, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
::]. ] (]) 02:59, 27 September 2011 (UTC) ::]. ] (]) 02:59, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
::: Are you done?--]] 03:00, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

== test ==

{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ]
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | test ]] 08:48, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
|}

Revision as of 08:48, 27 September 2011

I will respond to messages on this page. Please check your contributions list ("My contributions") for responses. If there is a response, your edit is no longer the "top" edit in the list.

Unlike other Wikipedians I don't archive Talk pages since old revisions are automatically archived anyway - if you want to access previous comments, please use the "Page history" function. But I keep a log of the removals:

WP:TROUT

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

Consensus is important. People are here to work together and earn a voice in the vision; not to mindlessly write articles for their Foundation Overlords. extransit (talk) 02:56, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for engaging extensively with the subject matter at hand and reaching an informed, thoughtful conclusion.--Eloquence* 02:57, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
WP:DUCK. extransit (talk) 02:59, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
User talk:Eloquence: Difference between revisions Add topic