| Revision as of 09:56, 22 September 2011 editTheroadislong (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers256,341 edits →It might be time.: Agreed... no problem← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:07, 5 October 2011 edit undoGogo Dodo (talk | contribs)Administrators197,922 edits →Re: Jewelry Television: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| The ] thread has dropped off the COI noticeboard and there's been no activity for some time. I'm willing to take the COI template off if you think it sounds like a good idea, on the understanding that both parties stick to the talk page - the article must now be on the watchlists (and hair-trigger revert lists) of enough experienced editors that we can come down heavy if it starts up again. Sound like a plan? ] (]) 09:54, 22 September 2011 (UTC) | The ] thread has dropped off the COI noticeboard and there's been no activity for some time. I'm willing to take the COI template off if you think it sounds like a good idea, on the understanding that both parties stick to the talk page - the article must now be on the watchlists (and hair-trigger revert lists) of enough experienced editors that we can come down heavy if it starts up again. Sound like a plan? ] (]) 09:54, 22 September 2011 (UTC) | ||
| :Agreed... no problem.] (]) 09:56, 22 September 2011 (UTC) | :Agreed... no problem.] (]) 09:56, 22 September 2011 (UTC) | ||
| == Re: ] == | |||
| Re : ] reverted their last edit. I see that they have resumed trying to add in marketing and copyrighted material into the article. I issued them another warning regarding the copyright material. If they continue along the same lines, please report them to ]. -- ] (]) 04:07, 5 October 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 04:07, 5 October 2011
/Archive 1
/Archive 2
/Archive 3
/Archive 4
/Archive 5
It might be time.
The Optical Express thread has dropped off the COI noticeboard and there's been no activity for some time. I'm willing to take the COI template off if you think it sounds like a good idea, on the understanding that both parties stick to the talk page - the article must now be on the watchlists (and hair-trigger revert lists) of enough experienced editors that we can come down heavy if it starts up again. Sound like a plan? Failedwizard (talk) 09:54, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
- Agreed... no problem.Theroadislong (talk) 09:56, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
Re: Jewelry Television
Re your message: Pinkadelica reverted their last edit. I see that they have resumed trying to add in marketing and copyrighted material into the article. I issued them another warning regarding the copyright material. If they continue along the same lines, please report them to WP:AIV. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:07, 5 October 2011 (UTC)