Revision as of 20:15, 16 December 2011 editRFC bot (talk | contribs)216,124 edits Please comment on Talk:King of the Hill (soundtrack).← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:48, 16 December 2011 edit undo72.151.121.170 (talk) →Mad Men, smoking: new sectionNext edit → | ||
Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
==Please comment on ]== | ==Please comment on ]== | ||
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the ] on ''']'''. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see ]. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from ].'' <!-- Template:FRS message -->— ] (]) 20:15, 16 December 2011 (UTC) | Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the ] on ''']'''. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see ]. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from ].'' <!-- Template:FRS message -->— ] (]) 20:15, 16 December 2011 (UTC) | ||
== Mad Men, smoking == | |||
Hi. You recently removed a section about smoking but I've restored it (as a subsection of an earlier thread which could also be questionably forum-y). While my reply to the OP may not directly connect with improving the article, this may be revisited within that context. I think the topic is worthy of the talkpage since smoking features heavily in the show and is thereby mentioned in the WP article. You may not like the Question or the discussion, but censoring it only invites more of the same. Better to address it and let it be archived if no one else wants to weigh in. Respectively, -anonAlph ] (]) 20:48, 16 December 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:48, 16 December 2011
Please click here to leave me a message. Thanks.Welcome to Lhb1239's Misplaced Pages talk page. Here is a great list of things to know and remember about this online encyclopedia -- it came in handy to me when first starting to edit Misplaced Pages and I still refer to it when necessary.
Please comment on Talk:7 World Trade CenterResponding to RFCs
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:7 World Trade Center. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible. You have received this notice because your name is on Misplaced Pages:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 13:15, 12 December 2011 (UTC) AIV reportCould you please explain why you consider the edits of User:67.190.9.122 to be vandalism? They seem to be normal edits to me. Qwyrxian (talk) 07:29, 13 December 2011 (UTC) Well, an IP removing references and code, reverting it back within seconds after receving warnings on the IPs talk page, and all without the use of an edit summary. All of that combined generally says "vandal" to me. Was I incorrect? (the IP was blocked for persistent vandalism) Lhb1239 (talk) 16:21, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:King of the Hill (soundtrack)Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:King of the Hill (soundtrack). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Misplaced Pages:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 20:15, 16 December 2011 (UTC) Mad Men, smokingHi. You recently removed a section about smoking but I've restored it (as a subsection of an earlier thread which could also be questionably forum-y). While my reply to the OP may not directly connect with improving the article, this may be revisited within that context. I think the topic is worthy of the talkpage since smoking features heavily in the show and is thereby mentioned in the WP article. You may not like the Question or the discussion, but censoring it only invites more of the same. Better to address it and let it be archived if no one else wants to weigh in. Respectively, -anonAlph 72.151.121.170 (talk) 20:48, 16 December 2011 (UTC) |