| Revision as of 04:41, 6 March 2012 editCatpowerzzz (talk | contribs)741 editsm clean up← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:19, 8 March 2012 edit undoNil Einne (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers73,178 edits →I suggest you take the concerns on ANI on board: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
| *... that All-American football player Art Walker played in 479 of 540 minutes in the Michigan Wolverines' 1954 season and later played seven years for the Edmonton Eskimos? | *... that All-American football player Art Walker played in 479 of 540 minutes in the Michigan Wolverines' 1954 season and later played seven years for the Edmonton Eskimos? | ||
| *... that the Portuguese destroyed Korlai Fort only 73 years after building it because they did not have enough men to guard the fort?</blockquote> | *... that the Portuguese destroyed Korlai Fort only 73 years after building it because they did not have enough men to guard the fort?</blockquote> | ||
| == I suggest you take the concerns on ANI on board == | |||
| I had a brief look at the ANI thread concerning you (which is currently archived although there's some suggestion it may be reopened) and even if nothing further comes out of it, I strongly suggest you take the concerns on board. Whatever the 'wrongs' of others you've been involved with, it seems clear several uninvolved people, upon looking at the history, have concerns about your behaviour and your explainations generally haven't helped (if anything they appear to have made things worse). Do remember that[REDACTED] is a collobrative project which means you have to work constructively with others, even those you may disagree with and sometimes have to agree to disagree and accept things aren't going to be how you prefer. Also, even if you have valid concerns, approaching them in an excessively aggressive manner is rarely productive. And if you do feel they need to be raised, make sure you do it in the right place and have evidence to back it up. Sometimes stuff you've worked on may be deleted or removed, try not to take it personally. Finally, if someone asks you specifically not to post to their talk page because of disagreements in the past, you generally should not do so unless absolutely necessary. | |||
| The reason I'm writing this is because from the little I saw, it looks a lot like you may find action taken against you in the near future if you continue down the same path as before even though you are a productive editor in many ways. Since this is just intended to be friendly advice and as I've said I haven't actually looked very well in to the situation, there's no real point trying to offer any explaination to me for your actions, but you're obviously free to reply if you wish. Remember what I said at the beginning though, if multiple experience editors with little involvement with you have serious concerns of your behavaiour as seemed to be the case at the ANI thread, this usually means you should take their advice on board, even if you feel they are wrong. | |||
| ] (]) 20:19, 8 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:19, 8 March 2012
Catpowerzz here
I like to keep this page clean. So comments will be deleted after they are read.
"Be real. But don't be really scary."- Catpowerzz
DYK for A Cat in the Brain
|
On February 11, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article A Cat in the Brain, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Dravecky (talk) 21:24, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
- -Thanks! Catpowerzzz (talk) 19:14, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
Did you know from '11 February 2009
- ... that travellers in southern Cambodia must stop to pay their respects to the spirit of Yeay Mao?
- ... that the 1988–1992 Irish television comedy Nighthawks was documented in the first episode of the 2008 Irish television show Boom! Boom! The Explosion of Irish Comedy?
- ... that Butch Hartman, the first rookie to lead a Daytona 500, later won five championships in a rival stock car racing series?
- ... that A Cat in the Brain is based on the reactions of its writer and director, Lucio Fulci, to real-life murders in Rome?
- ... that when Romanian diplomat Mihail Fărcăşanu published in the newspaper a translation of Ernest Hemingway's For Whom the Bell Tolls, the communist press called Fărcăşanu a fascist?
- ... that Palaemon serratus is the British Isles' largest native shrimp?
- ... that All-American football player Art Walker played in 479 of 540 minutes in the Michigan Wolverines' 1954 season and later played seven years for the Edmonton Eskimos?
- ... that the Portuguese destroyed Korlai Fort only 73 years after building it because they did not have enough men to guard the fort?
I suggest you take the concerns on ANI on board
I had a brief look at the ANI thread concerning you (which is currently archived although there's some suggestion it may be reopened) and even if nothing further comes out of it, I strongly suggest you take the concerns on board. Whatever the 'wrongs' of others you've been involved with, it seems clear several uninvolved people, upon looking at the history, have concerns about your behaviour and your explainations generally haven't helped (if anything they appear to have made things worse). Do remember that[REDACTED] is a collobrative project which means you have to work constructively with others, even those you may disagree with and sometimes have to agree to disagree and accept things aren't going to be how you prefer. Also, even if you have valid concerns, approaching them in an excessively aggressive manner is rarely productive. And if you do feel they need to be raised, make sure you do it in the right place and have evidence to back it up. Sometimes stuff you've worked on may be deleted or removed, try not to take it personally. Finally, if someone asks you specifically not to post to their talk page because of disagreements in the past, you generally should not do so unless absolutely necessary.
The reason I'm writing this is because from the little I saw, it looks a lot like you may find action taken against you in the near future if you continue down the same path as before even though you are a productive editor in many ways. Since this is just intended to be friendly advice and as I've said I haven't actually looked very well in to the situation, there's no real point trying to offer any explaination to me for your actions, but you're obviously free to reply if you wish. Remember what I said at the beginning though, if multiple experience editors with little involvement with you have serious concerns of your behavaiour as seemed to be the case at the ANI thread, this usually means you should take their advice on board, even if you feel they are wrong.