Revision as of 12:57, 8 March 2012 editFram (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, IP block exemptions, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors248,140 edits Rv to more neutral and better written version of article← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:07, 9 March 2012 edit undoMartinEden5 (talk | contribs)43 edits Undid revision 480828939 by Fram (talk)Next edit → | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Multiple issues|peacock=April 2009|COI=April 2009}} | {{Multiple issues|peacock=April 2009| unencyclopedic = April 2009|COI=April 2009}} | ||
'''David S. Lifton''' (born 1939) is |
'''David S. Lifton''' (born 1939) is a ] and author on the topic of the ]. He is also the author of "Pig on a Leash," an ] about the ]. | ||
⚫ | ==Best Evidence== | ||
The culmination of over 15 years of research was his 1981 book ''Best Evidence: Disguise and Deception in the Assassination of John F. Kennedy''<ref>Carroll & Graf Publishers, NYC, 1988, softcover, ISBN 0-88184-438-1</ref> which has now been reprinted (both hard-cover & soft-cover) several times and still is in print. It was on the best-seller list for almost four months, and was an "featured alternate" of the ]. The jacket of the 1981 ] hard-cover edition described the book as: | |||
::...the most painstaking study ever written of the possible ] of the JFK assassination. It contains facts, testimony, and statements by material witnesses never before disclosed. It leads us, inexorably, to the discovery of what really happened to America's most charismatic modern President. It is also the story of the author's courageous and lonely journey, an odyssey that slowly leads him to a final, terrible conclusion. | |||
::"Those in authority who conducted the investigation into what happened in ] on November 22, 1963, leaned heavily on what they considered the "best evidence," evidence they could find credible, rather than on the search for new information. But David Lifton's Dostoyevskian obsession with the unanswered questions led him deeper and deeper into uncharted territory. It led him at last to what was truly the "best evidence" — the body of the President—which became, in the hands of the conspirators, the means by which they deceived the American people and the world." | |||
Public Endorsement by ARRB Staff Member Douglas Horne | |||
DougIas Horne was Chief Analysis for Military Records for the ARRB, a small federal agency created by the 1992 JFK Records Act. In that capacity, Horne spent some three years investigating the medical evidence. He supervised the calling of witnesses, in the medical area, before the ARRB, and--besides General Counsel Jeremy Gunn--is one of the few people who has actually attended testimony given by all three of the JFK autopsy doctors. Horne's job--in accordance with the mandate of the ARRB, was to “clarify the record.” Horne, who is currently completing his own book on the medical evidence, issued the following statement in 2004 (and it can be found on the Spartacus website, run by Professor John Simkin, in London): | |||
"David Lifton's thesis in his 1981 book "Best Evidence" has been validated by the work of the ARRB staff. Our unsworn interviews and depositions of Dallas (Parkland Hospital) medical personnel and Bethesda autopsy participants confirm that the President's body arrived at Bethesda Naval Hospital in a markedly different condition than it was in when seen at Parkland for life-saving treatment. My conclusion is that wounds were indeed altered and bullets were indeed removed prior to the autopsy at Bethesda Naval Hospital. This procedure altered the autopsy conclusions and presented a false picture of how the shooting took place. In most essential details, David Lifton "got it right" in his 1981 bestseller. (He has modified his views since his book was published on the "when" and "where," and I concur with his changes, which he will publish at a later date.)" | |||
CONFIRMATION OF LIFTON'S WORK BY RECENTLY RELEASED AIR FORCE ONE TRANSCRIPTS | |||
The recent release of the "Clifton" version of the Air Force One transcript--recording conversations between the plane, and the White House and the Pentagon--contain transmissions about a "black cadillac" vehicle that is supposed to meet AF-1 upon its arrival at Andrews Air Force Base. These transmissions offer important support to the account of naval petty officer Dennis David's account--first published in Chapter 25 of Best Evidence--that the president's body arrived in a black hearse, accompanied by men in civilian clothes, some 20 minutes prior to the arrival of the naval ambulance carring Jacqueline Kennedy and Robert Kennedy, which arrived from Andrews, with the Dallas coffin. If Dennis David's account is true, then the Dallas coffin was empty. | |||
==Biography== | ==Biography== | ||
David S. Lifton is a native ]er |
David S. Lifton is a native ]er who moved to Los Angeles in 1962, after graduating from Cornell University's School of Engineering Physics. In Los Angeles, he worked as a computer engineer on ], JFK's project to land a man on the moon, while also attending ] for an advanced degree (he eventually earned his Masters from Cornell University). In the fall of 1964, around the time the ] was published, he became interested in the JFK case, and in the Spring of 1965, bought a set of the 26 Volumes of the ]. He was one of the "first generation" of researchers on the Kennedy case. | ||
In June 1966, Lifton lived and worked in San Francisco, where he was employed by ], on their Kennedy project. The result was a 30,000 word article, '''The Case For Three Assassins''' (published as a cover story in the January, 1967 issue), which laid out the case that more than one assassin was firing at Kennedy, based on anomalies in the medical evidence. "The Case for Three Assassins" was the first time a major piece of writing had been done on the backward snap of JFK's head so clearly visible in the Zapruder film. Physicists were interviewed, and one in particular—Dr. ], of the UCLA Department of Physics—went on record with his opinion that the backward headsnap was impossible if JFK had been struck from behind. | |||
Lifton, meanwhile, had struck up an acquaintanceship with UCLA Law professor Wesley Liebeler, and had many hours of discussions, with Liebeler, about the contradictions in the medical evidence, and particularly the integrity of the autopsy report, which was based on an examination of JFK's body at the autopsy, on the night of the assassination. At that time, no entry wounds were found on the front of the body, even though, in Dallas, the doctors thought the President was struck from the front. Similarly, at Dallas, the doctors found an exit wound at the rear of the head, but no rear exit was on the body at Bethesda. Were the Bethesda doctors simply lying? It was a consequence of this dialectic--with Lifton believing (originally) that the autopsy doctors were lying, and Liebeler defending the position that they must have testified truthfully--that Lifton made an amazing discovery. On October 23, 1966, he found an FBI report written by two agents at the autopsy that stated that, when the body was examined at Bethesda, it was "apparent" that there had been "surgery of the head area, namely, in the top of the skull." Lifton brought this information to Liebeler's attention the very next day, and he was astounded. As a consequence, he wrote a 13 page memorandum on the autopsy, suggesting a limited reopening of the investigation in this area, and calling attention to Lifton's discovery. The memo was sent to Chief Justice Warren, every member of the Commission (and its staff), President Johnson, the Justice Department, and Robert Kennedy. | |||
Nothing was done, and that is when Lifton made the decision to pursue the matter as an individual, and write a book. He vastly underestimated the amount of time it would take, and the project--which he thought would last about a year--mushroomed into a full 14 years of full time work--and it resulted in Best Evidence, which was published in January, 1981, was a Book of the Month Club Selection, was nominated for a Pulitzer, was Number one on many best seller lists, and was on the New York Times best-seller list for just under four months, rising to position number 4. | |||
⚫ | David Lifton |
||
When Lifton's book was published, Time magazine afforded it two full pages--as a news story in the National Affairs section. | |||
⚫ | Today, David Lifton lives in Los Angeles, and is working full time to complete a major work on Lee Harvey Oswald. | ||
Realizing the importance of some of the accounts of the witnesses he interviewed, Lifton arranged to have them filmed in October, 1980, just prior to the publication of the book. There was no "home video" at that time; but when technology advanced and home video recorders were in most homes, Lifton --sponsored by Rhino--used the footage and created BEST EVIDENCE: The Research Video. This video--which earned very positive reviews, and sold around 50,000 copies--permits viewers to meet the core witnesses in his book: Aubrey Rike, the Dallas funeral attendant, who put Kennedy's body into a ceremonial casket, and key witnesses from Bethesda (Paul O'Connor, Dennis David, and Jerrol Custer) who were aware that it arrived at Bethesda in a body bag. | |||
⚫ | ==Best Evidence== | ||
In 1981 David Lifton published his book ''Best Evidence: Disguise and Deception in the Assassination of John F. Kennedy''.<ref>Carroll & Graf Publishers, NYC, 1988, softcover, ISBN 0-88184-438-1</ref> In the book Lifton claims that after John F. Kennedy's assassination unnamed conspirators stole the dead presidents corpse in transit from Dallas, Texas, to Bethesda, Maryland, and took it to ] where bullets were removed, existing wounds altered, and false wounds added, all in an attempt to frame Oswald. Lifton then claims the body was shipped to the Bethesda Naval Medical School morgue and placed in its original casket in time for the autopsy by Navy pathologists. The book was on the best-seller list for months, and was an "featured alternate" of the ]. It has been reprinted (both hard-cover & soft-cover) several times and still is in print. | |||
Some of these witnesses were called to give testimony before the Assassination Records and Review Board. In fact, David Lifton worked very closely with the staff of the ARRB, both in the area of the medical evidence, and the Zapruder film. In April, 1995, he was one of those who was called to Washington for the "Expert's Conference," advising the ARRB as to what lines of investigation ought to be pursued. He testified before the Board in 1996, at that time donating a very rare 35 mm copy of the Zapruder film, that he made, on an optical printer, from one of the "1967 original copies" made by Life Magazine. | |||
⚫ | In an updated 1988 edition of ''Best Evidence'', Lifton was responsible for the first publication of a series of autopsy photographs taken of President Kennedy at Bethesda Naval Medical Center. Lifton had acquired these photos after the initial publication of ''Best Evidence'' from a former Secret Service employee, who had made private copies with the permission of Agent ]. Lifton also used the photos during his appearance on the October 1988 PBS ] episode ''Who Shot President Kennedy?'', which marked the first time they were shown on television. Lifton |
||
⚫ | In an updated 1988 edition of ''Best Evidence'', Lifton was responsible for the first publication of a series of autopsy photographs taken of President Kennedy at Bethesda Naval Medical Center. Lifton had acquired these photos after the initial publication of ''Best Evidence'' from a former Secret Service employee, who had made private copies with the permission of Agent ]. Lifton also used the photos during his appearance on the October 1988 PBS ] episode ''Who Shot President Kennedy?'', which marked the first time they were shown on television. Lifton argues that the actual photographs are consistent with his thesis of body alteration. | ||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | David Lifton believes ] was legally innocent of JFK's assassination, and should properly be viewed as "the man who didn't do it." In 1992, Lifton, as a paid advisor, worked closely with screenwriter Steve Bello and producer Robert Dornheim in producing the Wolper film "The Marina Oswald Story," which has since been re-titled as "Fatal Deception" and is shown on the History Channel. | ||
⚫ | Today, David Lifton lives in Los Angeles, and is working full time to complete a major work on Lee Harvey Oswald. | ||
⚫ | ==Criticism== | ||
'''Roger Bruce Feinman, J.D. (author of "''Between the Signal and the Noise''")''' | '''Roger Bruce Feinman, J.D. (author of "''Between the Signal and the Noise''")''' | ||
The late Roger Feinman was a disbarred lawyer who --some years prior to his disbarment--was also fired from CBS News. The record of this disbarment can be found at http://openjurist.org/239/f3d/498/committee-v-roger Under "Conclusion", the Committee on Grievances of the United States District Court for the Eastern District Court states: "Having failed to present any disputed factual issue requiring an evidentiary hearing or any legal issue concerning the constitutional sufficiency of the Southern District's disciplinary proceeding, respondent is hereby disbarred, and his name shall be stricken from the roll of attorneys." Feinman subsequently appealed his disbarment, but the original disbarment was "affirmed." | |||
In the early 1990s, he distributed an essay on the Compuserve forum alleging that David Lifton made up the thesis of Best Evidence in order to get a book contract. Feinman was given a forum for such unfounded charged by Professor Kenneth Rahn at the University of Rhode Island. Feinman fallaciously reasoned that since Lifton withheld from the late Slvia Meagher (author of Accessores after the Fact) the details of his research, that their corresondance was a valid indicator of what Lifton discovered, and when he discovered it. Unfortunately (for Feinman) the "best evidence" of what Lifton discovered, and when he discovered it, are the actual FBI reports the actual FBI reports that were written --in November, 1966--when Lifton telephoned FBI Agent James SIbert (who was at the JFK autopsy) and queried him about the statement in his report that it was "apparent" that there had been "surgery of the head area, namely, in the top of the skull." Other documentary evidence as to when Lifton made his discoveries arise out of his well documented relationship with UCLA Law Professor Wesley Liebeler. Lifton never shared any of that with Sylvia Meagher, nor did he tell Meagher that Commission Attorney Wesley Liebeler, upon being briefed on Lifton's discoveries, wrote a memorandum that went to Chief Justice Warren, President Johnson, and Attorney General Robert Kennedy, spelling out the significance to the Warren Commission investigation if the President's wounds had been altered prior to autopsy, as indicated in the Sibert and O'Neill FBI report. Feinan appears to believe that because none of this was revealed to his mentor (Sylvia Meagher) that none of this actually happened. But, unfortuantely for Feinman, it most certainly did. So Lifton distributed a humorous essay titled "Who is Roger Feinman and why does he hate me so much?" Feinman called his commentary on Lifton's work "literary criticism," but Lifton responded that it was just a bunch of nonsense. Feinman then arranged for part of his "literary criticism" to be published in Harrison Livingstone's book "Killing Truth," but when discussing the matter, fails to mention that Livingstone is a most eccentric individual, having left death threats on David Lifton's voice mail, and actually having gone to court and suing Lifton for $50 million, claiming Lifton was part of a conspiracy to kill him. (The court, of course, dismissed the suit). Lifton maintains that there is much about the Kennedy assassination to be debated, and anyone is free to debate the details of his thesis that JFK's autopsy was falsified because the wounds were altered prior to this critical examination, but that there is nothing partiuclarly legitimate or relevant in the bizarre attacks on his work by the late Roger Feinman, and which Feinman calls "literary criticism." | |||
In the early 1990s, Roger Bruce Feinman distributed an essay on the Compuserve forum alleging that David Lifton made up the thesis of Best Evidence in order to get a book contract. Feinman was given a forum for his charges by Professor Kenneth Rahn at the University of Rhode Island. Feinman reasoned that since Lifton withheld from the late Sylvia Meagher (author of Accessores after the Fact) the details of his research, that their correspondence was a valid indicator of what Lifton discovered, and when he discovered it. | |||
After the advent of the World Wide Web, "''Between the Signal and the Noise''" was web-published by permission of its author. Lifton threatened the president of the University of Rhode Island to sue for publishing allegedly libelous and defamatory materials about him. The University then arranged with the proprietor of Meagher's collected private papers, Hood College of Frederick, MD, for URI faculty member, Dr. Kenneth A. Rahn, to vet the contents of Feinman's book against her correspondence and memoranda of telephone conversations. After spending several days with Meagher's papers at Hood, Dr. Rahn reported back to URI that Feinman had indeed portrayed the letters and notes accurately, and that he could find no factual errors in Feinman's book. | |||
Gerald A. Posner (author of "Case Closed") | |||
Author and lawyer |
Author and lawyer Gerald Posner has described Lifton's book as "one of the most unusual conspiracy theories" that "relies on an elaborate shell game involving rapid exchanges of coffins, a decoy ambulance, and a switched body shroud. He contends that once the body (of President Kennedy) was stolen from Air Force One, a covert team of surgeons surgically altered the corpse before the autopsy later that day...purportedly...so the autopsy physicians would determine the bullets that hit the President were fired from the rear...thereby sealing the case against Oswald." | ||
Posner contends that the theory falls apart based on two failings. | Posner contends that the theory falls apart based on two failings. | ||
Medical | |||
Posner cites Dr. Michael Baden, chief forensic pathologist for the |
Posner cites Dr. Michael Baden, chief forensic pathologist for the House Select Committee on Assassinations, who says "Lifton just doesn't know what he is talking about. It's a fantasy of his. He thinks he sees signs of surgery in some of the autopsy photos, but he doesn't know how to read those pictures. It's laughable. He's not a doctor and it's clear by his work that he doesn't understand what really happened. He doesn't even take into account rigor mortis, which starts two hours after death." | ||
⚫ | Posner also cites Dr. Cyril Wecht, a vocal critic of the Warren Commission conclusions, who says "Lifton gets away with crap, and no one challenges him. I could assemble a whole team of the best surgeons in the country and still not be able to accomplish in a day what Lifton says was done in a few hours. I have never bought his stuff. It can't be done." | ||
⚫ | Opportunity | ||
⚫ | Posner notes secondly that Lifton's body alteration theory fails because his "entire scenario rests upon the President's casket being unattended on Air Force One for a few minutes, so that the body could be stolen. In a seven-hundred page book, Lifton spends only two pages on this essential issue. Yet the casket was never unattended." | ||
Lifton has responded that this is false. First of all, the coffin was always "attended" by agents of the White House Detail. The issue is whether some of them were instructed to remove the body from the casket, and place it elsewhere on the plane (e.g., in luggage). Notably, there is a three or four minute period when the entire Presidential party was down on the tarmac, while the coffin was being placed aboard Air Force One, by Secret Service agents of the White House Detail. Lifton maintains that the notion that the body was never "unattended" is a canard. | |||
In response to Dr. Baden, Lifton notes that Baden had no idea that the documents he examined for the House Select Committee showed no weight for the brain--further circumstantial evidence that the brain had been removed prior to the time the body arrived--until Baden was confronted by that most unpleasant fact on national TV (Hardcopy, 1990). Furthermore, rigor mortis has little to do with the issues raised in his book. | |||
Regarding the head wound, the central issue is that the Dallas wound was 35sq cm (about 2-3/4") according to the sworn testimony of the late Dr. Carrico, whereas it was 400% larger (170 sq cm) according to the diagram created at autopsy by Dr. Boswell, who used a ruler to measure the defect. As to Wecht, he is entitled to his opinion as to what he thinks is possible, and not possible, but the fact remains that (a) the doctors said it was "apparent" there was "surgery of the head area" and (b) the wounds--both head and neck--changed dramatically in size between Dallas and Bethesda. When, during the ARRB's re-investigation, Dr. Boswell was asked to draw on a medical skul the size of the wound, the huge wound he drew was clearly larger, by some 400%, than what as observed in the Emergency Room in Dallas. | |||
⚫ | Posner also cites Dr. |
||
^ Carroll & Graf Publishers, NYC, 1988, softcover, ISBN 0-88184-438-1 | |||
⚫ | |||
^ Case Closed: Lee Harvey Oswald and the Assassination of JFK ISBN 0-679-41825-3, pp.296-297 | |||
⚫ | Posner notes secondly that Lifton's body alteration theory fails because his "entire scenario rests upon the President's casket being unattended on |
||
^ Ibid, p. 297 | |||
^ Ibid, p. 297 | |||
^ Ibid, p. 297 | |||
== References == | == References == |
Revision as of 05:07, 9 March 2012
This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)
No issues specified. Please specify issues, or remove this template. (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
David S. Lifton (born 1939) is a researcher and author on the topic of the assassination of John F. Kennedy. He is also the author of "Pig on a Leash," an essay about the Zapruder film.
Best Evidence
The culmination of over 15 years of research was his 1981 book Best Evidence: Disguise and Deception in the Assassination of John F. Kennedy which has now been reprinted (both hard-cover & soft-cover) several times and still is in print. It was on the best-seller list for almost four months, and was an "featured alternate" of the Book-of-the-Month Club. The jacket of the 1981 Macmillan hard-cover edition described the book as:
- ...the most painstaking study ever written of the possible cover up of the JFK assassination. It contains facts, testimony, and statements by material witnesses never before disclosed. It leads us, inexorably, to the discovery of what really happened to America's most charismatic modern President. It is also the story of the author's courageous and lonely journey, an odyssey that slowly leads him to a final, terrible conclusion.
- "Those in authority who conducted the investigation into what happened in Dallas on November 22, 1963, leaned heavily on what they considered the "best evidence," evidence they could find credible, rather than on the search for new information. But David Lifton's Dostoyevskian obsession with the unanswered questions led him deeper and deeper into uncharted territory. It led him at last to what was truly the "best evidence" — the body of the President—which became, in the hands of the conspirators, the means by which they deceived the American people and the world."
Public Endorsement by ARRB Staff Member Douglas Horne
DougIas Horne was Chief Analysis for Military Records for the ARRB, a small federal agency created by the 1992 JFK Records Act. In that capacity, Horne spent some three years investigating the medical evidence. He supervised the calling of witnesses, in the medical area, before the ARRB, and--besides General Counsel Jeremy Gunn--is one of the few people who has actually attended testimony given by all three of the JFK autopsy doctors. Horne's job--in accordance with the mandate of the ARRB, was to “clarify the record.” Horne, who is currently completing his own book on the medical evidence, issued the following statement in 2004 (and it can be found on the Spartacus website, run by Professor John Simkin, in London):
"David Lifton's thesis in his 1981 book "Best Evidence" has been validated by the work of the ARRB staff. Our unsworn interviews and depositions of Dallas (Parkland Hospital) medical personnel and Bethesda autopsy participants confirm that the President's body arrived at Bethesda Naval Hospital in a markedly different condition than it was in when seen at Parkland for life-saving treatment. My conclusion is that wounds were indeed altered and bullets were indeed removed prior to the autopsy at Bethesda Naval Hospital. This procedure altered the autopsy conclusions and presented a false picture of how the shooting took place. In most essential details, David Lifton "got it right" in his 1981 bestseller. (He has modified his views since his book was published on the "when" and "where," and I concur with his changes, which he will publish at a later date.)"
CONFIRMATION OF LIFTON'S WORK BY RECENTLY RELEASED AIR FORCE ONE TRANSCRIPTS
The recent release of the "Clifton" version of the Air Force One transcript--recording conversations between the plane, and the White House and the Pentagon--contain transmissions about a "black cadillac" vehicle that is supposed to meet AF-1 upon its arrival at Andrews Air Force Base. These transmissions offer important support to the account of naval petty officer Dennis David's account--first published in Chapter 25 of Best Evidence--that the president's body arrived in a black hearse, accompanied by men in civilian clothes, some 20 minutes prior to the arrival of the naval ambulance carring Jacqueline Kennedy and Robert Kennedy, which arrived from Andrews, with the Dallas coffin. If Dennis David's account is true, then the Dallas coffin was empty.
Biography
David S. Lifton is a native New Yorker who moved to Los Angeles in 1962, after graduating from Cornell University's School of Engineering Physics. In Los Angeles, he worked as a computer engineer on Project Apollo, JFK's project to land a man on the moon, while also attending UCLA for an advanced degree (he eventually earned his Masters from Cornell University). In the fall of 1964, around the time the Warren Report was published, he became interested in the JFK case, and in the Spring of 1965, bought a set of the 26 Volumes of the Warren Commission. He was one of the "first generation" of researchers on the Kennedy case.
In June 1966, Lifton lived and worked in San Francisco, where he was employed by Ramparts Magazine, on their Kennedy project. The result was a 30,000 word article, The Case For Three Assassins (published as a cover story in the January, 1967 issue), which laid out the case that more than one assassin was firing at Kennedy, based on anomalies in the medical evidence. "The Case for Three Assassins" was the first time a major piece of writing had been done on the backward snap of JFK's head so clearly visible in the Zapruder film. Physicists were interviewed, and one in particular—Dr. James Riddle, of the UCLA Department of Physics—went on record with his opinion that the backward headsnap was impossible if JFK had been struck from behind. Lifton, meanwhile, had struck up an acquaintanceship with UCLA Law professor Wesley Liebeler, and had many hours of discussions, with Liebeler, about the contradictions in the medical evidence, and particularly the integrity of the autopsy report, which was based on an examination of JFK's body at the autopsy, on the night of the assassination. At that time, no entry wounds were found on the front of the body, even though, in Dallas, the doctors thought the President was struck from the front. Similarly, at Dallas, the doctors found an exit wound at the rear of the head, but no rear exit was on the body at Bethesda. Were the Bethesda doctors simply lying? It was a consequence of this dialectic--with Lifton believing (originally) that the autopsy doctors were lying, and Liebeler defending the position that they must have testified truthfully--that Lifton made an amazing discovery. On October 23, 1966, he found an FBI report written by two agents at the autopsy that stated that, when the body was examined at Bethesda, it was "apparent" that there had been "surgery of the head area, namely, in the top of the skull." Lifton brought this information to Liebeler's attention the very next day, and he was astounded. As a consequence, he wrote a 13 page memorandum on the autopsy, suggesting a limited reopening of the investigation in this area, and calling attention to Lifton's discovery. The memo was sent to Chief Justice Warren, every member of the Commission (and its staff), President Johnson, the Justice Department, and Robert Kennedy.
Nothing was done, and that is when Lifton made the decision to pursue the matter as an individual, and write a book. He vastly underestimated the amount of time it would take, and the project--which he thought would last about a year--mushroomed into a full 14 years of full time work--and it resulted in Best Evidence, which was published in January, 1981, was a Book of the Month Club Selection, was nominated for a Pulitzer, was Number one on many best seller lists, and was on the New York Times best-seller list for just under four months, rising to position number 4.
When Lifton's book was published, Time magazine afforded it two full pages--as a news story in the National Affairs section.
Realizing the importance of some of the accounts of the witnesses he interviewed, Lifton arranged to have them filmed in October, 1980, just prior to the publication of the book. There was no "home video" at that time; but when technology advanced and home video recorders were in most homes, Lifton --sponsored by Rhino--used the footage and created BEST EVIDENCE: The Research Video. This video--which earned very positive reviews, and sold around 50,000 copies--permits viewers to meet the core witnesses in his book: Aubrey Rike, the Dallas funeral attendant, who put Kennedy's body into a ceremonial casket, and key witnesses from Bethesda (Paul O'Connor, Dennis David, and Jerrol Custer) who were aware that it arrived at Bethesda in a body bag.
Some of these witnesses were called to give testimony before the Assassination Records and Review Board. In fact, David Lifton worked very closely with the staff of the ARRB, both in the area of the medical evidence, and the Zapruder film. In April, 1995, he was one of those who was called to Washington for the "Expert's Conference," advising the ARRB as to what lines of investigation ought to be pursued. He testified before the Board in 1996, at that time donating a very rare 35 mm copy of the Zapruder film, that he made, on an optical printer, from one of the "1967 original copies" made by Life Magazine.
In an updated 1988 edition of Best Evidence, Lifton was responsible for the first publication of a series of autopsy photographs taken of President Kennedy at Bethesda Naval Medical Center. Lifton had acquired these photos after the initial publication of Best Evidence from a former Secret Service employee, who had made private copies with the permission of Agent Roy Kellerman. Lifton also used the photos during his appearance on the October 1988 PBS Nova episode Who Shot President Kennedy?, which marked the first time they were shown on television. Lifton argues that the actual photographs are consistent with his thesis of body alteration.
David Lifton believes Lee Harvey Oswald was legally innocent of JFK's assassination, and should properly be viewed as "the man who didn't do it." In 1992, Lifton, as a paid advisor, worked closely with screenwriter Steve Bello and producer Robert Dornheim in producing the Wolper film "The Marina Oswald Story," which has since been re-titled as "Fatal Deception" and is shown on the History Channel.
Today, David Lifton lives in Los Angeles, and is working full time to complete a major work on Lee Harvey Oswald.
Criticism
Roger Bruce Feinman, J.D. (author of "Between the Signal and the Noise") The late Roger Feinman was a disbarred lawyer who --some years prior to his disbarment--was also fired from CBS News. The record of this disbarment can be found at http://openjurist.org/239/f3d/498/committee-v-roger Under "Conclusion", the Committee on Grievances of the United States District Court for the Eastern District Court states: "Having failed to present any disputed factual issue requiring an evidentiary hearing or any legal issue concerning the constitutional sufficiency of the Southern District's disciplinary proceeding, respondent is hereby disbarred, and his name shall be stricken from the roll of attorneys." Feinman subsequently appealed his disbarment, but the original disbarment was "affirmed."
In the early 1990s, he distributed an essay on the Compuserve forum alleging that David Lifton made up the thesis of Best Evidence in order to get a book contract. Feinman was given a forum for such unfounded charged by Professor Kenneth Rahn at the University of Rhode Island. Feinman fallaciously reasoned that since Lifton withheld from the late Slvia Meagher (author of Accessores after the Fact) the details of his research, that their corresondance was a valid indicator of what Lifton discovered, and when he discovered it. Unfortunately (for Feinman) the "best evidence" of what Lifton discovered, and when he discovered it, are the actual FBI reports the actual FBI reports that were written --in November, 1966--when Lifton telephoned FBI Agent James SIbert (who was at the JFK autopsy) and queried him about the statement in his report that it was "apparent" that there had been "surgery of the head area, namely, in the top of the skull." Other documentary evidence as to when Lifton made his discoveries arise out of his well documented relationship with UCLA Law Professor Wesley Liebeler. Lifton never shared any of that with Sylvia Meagher, nor did he tell Meagher that Commission Attorney Wesley Liebeler, upon being briefed on Lifton's discoveries, wrote a memorandum that went to Chief Justice Warren, President Johnson, and Attorney General Robert Kennedy, spelling out the significance to the Warren Commission investigation if the President's wounds had been altered prior to autopsy, as indicated in the Sibert and O'Neill FBI report. Feinan appears to believe that because none of this was revealed to his mentor (Sylvia Meagher) that none of this actually happened. But, unfortuantely for Feinman, it most certainly did. So Lifton distributed a humorous essay titled "Who is Roger Feinman and why does he hate me so much?" Feinman called his commentary on Lifton's work "literary criticism," but Lifton responded that it was just a bunch of nonsense. Feinman then arranged for part of his "literary criticism" to be published in Harrison Livingstone's book "Killing Truth," but when discussing the matter, fails to mention that Livingstone is a most eccentric individual, having left death threats on David Lifton's voice mail, and actually having gone to court and suing Lifton for $50 million, claiming Lifton was part of a conspiracy to kill him. (The court, of course, dismissed the suit). Lifton maintains that there is much about the Kennedy assassination to be debated, and anyone is free to debate the details of his thesis that JFK's autopsy was falsified because the wounds were altered prior to this critical examination, but that there is nothing partiuclarly legitimate or relevant in the bizarre attacks on his work by the late Roger Feinman, and which Feinman calls "literary criticism."
Gerald A. Posner (author of "Case Closed")
Author and lawyer Gerald Posner has described Lifton's book as "one of the most unusual conspiracy theories" that "relies on an elaborate shell game involving rapid exchanges of coffins, a decoy ambulance, and a switched body shroud. He contends that once the body (of President Kennedy) was stolen from Air Force One, a covert team of surgeons surgically altered the corpse before the autopsy later that day...purportedly...so the autopsy physicians would determine the bullets that hit the President were fired from the rear...thereby sealing the case against Oswald."
Posner contends that the theory falls apart based on two failings.
Medical
Posner cites Dr. Michael Baden, chief forensic pathologist for the House Select Committee on Assassinations, who says "Lifton just doesn't know what he is talking about. It's a fantasy of his. He thinks he sees signs of surgery in some of the autopsy photos, but he doesn't know how to read those pictures. It's laughable. He's not a doctor and it's clear by his work that he doesn't understand what really happened. He doesn't even take into account rigor mortis, which starts two hours after death."
Posner also cites Dr. Cyril Wecht, a vocal critic of the Warren Commission conclusions, who says "Lifton gets away with crap, and no one challenges him. I could assemble a whole team of the best surgeons in the country and still not be able to accomplish in a day what Lifton says was done in a few hours. I have never bought his stuff. It can't be done."
Opportunity
Posner notes secondly that Lifton's body alteration theory fails because his "entire scenario rests upon the President's casket being unattended on Air Force One for a few minutes, so that the body could be stolen. In a seven-hundred page book, Lifton spends only two pages on this essential issue. Yet the casket was never unattended."
Lifton has responded that this is false. First of all, the coffin was always "attended" by agents of the White House Detail. The issue is whether some of them were instructed to remove the body from the casket, and place it elsewhere on the plane (e.g., in luggage). Notably, there is a three or four minute period when the entire Presidential party was down on the tarmac, while the coffin was being placed aboard Air Force One, by Secret Service agents of the White House Detail. Lifton maintains that the notion that the body was never "unattended" is a canard.
In response to Dr. Baden, Lifton notes that Baden had no idea that the documents he examined for the House Select Committee showed no weight for the brain--further circumstantial evidence that the brain had been removed prior to the time the body arrived--until Baden was confronted by that most unpleasant fact on national TV (Hardcopy, 1990). Furthermore, rigor mortis has little to do with the issues raised in his book.
Regarding the head wound, the central issue is that the Dallas wound was 35sq cm (about 2-3/4") according to the sworn testimony of the late Dr. Carrico, whereas it was 400% larger (170 sq cm) according to the diagram created at autopsy by Dr. Boswell, who used a ruler to measure the defect. As to Wecht, he is entitled to his opinion as to what he thinks is possible, and not possible, but the fact remains that (a) the doctors said it was "apparent" there was "surgery of the head area" and (b) the wounds--both head and neck--changed dramatically in size between Dallas and Bethesda. When, during the ARRB's re-investigation, Dr. Boswell was asked to draw on a medical skul the size of the wound, the huge wound he drew was clearly larger, by some 400%, than what as observed in the Emergency Room in Dallas.
^ Carroll & Graf Publishers, NYC, 1988, softcover, ISBN 0-88184-438-1 ^ Case Closed: Lee Harvey Oswald and the Assassination of JFK ISBN 0-679-41825-3, pp.296-297 ^ Ibid, p. 297 ^ Ibid, p. 297 ^ Ibid, p. 297
References
- Carroll & Graf Publishers, NYC, 1988, softcover, ISBN 0-88184-438-1