Misplaced Pages

User talk:BokicaK: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:23, 15 April 2012 editBbb23 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators271,595 edits →English: new section← Previous edit Revision as of 08:47, 16 April 2012 edit undoWikiEditor2004 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users51,646 edits →Problem sa šablonimaNext edit →
Line 1,046: Line 1,046:


:::Pa već sam ti predložio kako da rešimo problem Beograda. Ja mislim da treba da se pridržavamo ovog dokumenta: http://media.popis2011.stat.rs/2011/prvi_rezultati.pdf Nije to "samo statistički" dokument, već on tačno odražava teritorijalnu podelu Srbije. Dakle, u tom dokumentu ne postoje odvojeno autonomna pokrajina Vojvodina i statistički region Vojvodina i samim tim bi bilo netačno da imamo posebne kolone za to, na osnovu čega bi ispalo da je statustički region Vojvodina podređen autonomnoj pokrajini Vojvodini - ja ne vidim osnovu za takvo tumačenje. Sa druge strane, kod Beograda imamo okrug, koji je podređen regionu, a oba imaju istu teritoriju. Ja zato mislim da je i kod Vojvodine i kod Beograda najbolje spojiti te iste teritorije u jednu kolonu gde bi kod Vojvodine imali "Province / Region", a kod Beograda "Region / District" (ili možemo izabrati samo jedan opis od ta dva). Stvarno ne vidim osnovu u zvaničnim dokumentima za korišćenje dve kolone za Vojvodinu. ] 12:20, 14 April 2012 (UTC) :::Pa već sam ti predložio kako da rešimo problem Beograda. Ja mislim da treba da se pridržavamo ovog dokumenta: http://media.popis2011.stat.rs/2011/prvi_rezultati.pdf Nije to "samo statistički" dokument, već on tačno odražava teritorijalnu podelu Srbije. Dakle, u tom dokumentu ne postoje odvojeno autonomna pokrajina Vojvodina i statistički region Vojvodina i samim tim bi bilo netačno da imamo posebne kolone za to, na osnovu čega bi ispalo da je statustički region Vojvodina podređen autonomnoj pokrajini Vojvodini - ja ne vidim osnovu za takvo tumačenje. Sa druge strane, kod Beograda imamo okrug, koji je podređen regionu, a oba imaju istu teritoriju. Ja zato mislim da je i kod Vojvodine i kod Beograda najbolje spojiti te iste teritorije u jednu kolonu gde bi kod Vojvodine imali "Province / Region", a kod Beograda "Region / District" (ili možemo izabrati samo jedan opis od ta dva). Stvarno ne vidim osnovu u zvaničnim dokumentima za korišćenje dve kolone za Vojvodinu. ] 12:20, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

::::Koga da pitamo? ] 08:46, 16 April 2012 (UTC)


== English == == English ==

Revision as of 08:47, 16 April 2012

Misplaced Pages ad for Commons:Main Page
Misplaced Pages adsfile info – show another – #89

Welcome

Hello, BokicaK, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Dick Clark 14:23, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

Re: The Many Dream Journeys of Meme

It doesn't read very well and it is difficult to understand what the article is describing. Also, no reliable sources are reference nor are any real-world relevance and context given. While the latter two are common among other anime articles, we like to avoid repeating these mistakes with the newer articles. --Farix (Talk) 14:57, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Montenegro

So not even you live in Montenegro, huh. ;) I think Misplaced Pages is the only place with 50 Montenegrin Wikipedians (or several naughty ones and a lot of sockpuppets), among whom only one lives in Montenegro. :D --PaxEquilibrium 22:22, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Novi Sad

Nisam stigao ranije da ti odgovorim na poruku. Trenutno nemam vremena da prevodim te članke na engleski, ali ako nađem vremena videću da li mogu nešto prevesti. PANONIAN (talk) 21:45, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

Mapa CG

"Možeš li da nacrtaš novu mapu podele Crne Gore po nahijama"

Pa sad, sa tehničke strane gledano mogu, ali mislim da trenutno nemam dovoljno slobodnog vremena da to uradim jer treba malo više rada na toj mapi. Ako nađem vremena nacrtaću tu mapu, ali ništa ne obećavam. PANONIAN 12:58, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Tenis

Pa rado bi se prihvatio tog posla, ali ja nemam vremena da se obavezujem na nista po netu. I ovo što uradim je random. Ja sam inače jako loš u organizaciji vremena, pa sam pogub skoro uvek. Mada mogu doći na portal, stavio sam ga u bookmark, da nešto napišem, ubacim i sl... ali ne mogu da obećam neku stalnu aktivnost na portalu :) --Göran Smith 19:31, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Please use edit summaries

Hello. Please be courteous to other editors and use edit summaries when updating articles. The Mathbot tool shows your usage of edit summaries to be extremely low:

Edit summary usage for BokicaK: 17% for major edits and 14% for minor edits. Based on the last 115 major and 150 minor edits in the article namespace.

Using edit summaries helps other editors quickly understand your edits, which is especially useful when you make changes to articles that are on others' watchlists. Thanks and happy editing! --Kralizec! (talk) 11:56, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Kosovo

Hello. There's a discussion and vote going on at Talk:Kosovo#Kosovo:_terminology as to whether or not it's better to use Kosovo rather than Kosovan or Kosovar in the Misplaced Pages articles. You've contributed to Balkans articles in the past and I thought you might have an interest. Cheers. 16:12, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Germany Invitation

Hello, BokicaK! I'd like to call your attention to the WikiProject Germany and the German-speaking Wikipedians' notice board. I hope their links, sub-projects and discussions are interesting and even helpful to you. If not, I hope that new ones will be.


--Zeitgespenst (talk) 17:49, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

slike

Imam problema sa obradom one .svg mape. U ilustratoru su se skroz promenile boje i zadebljale granice iako nista nisam dirao. Svejedno sam postavio taj fajl gde je Kirgistan protiv.

I ovde treba da se postavi slika odozgo 2008_unrest_in_Serbia sa skupa gde se vidi koliko je ljudi bilo ali ja nemam moju a sve novinske su isuvise male da bih nalepio tag da sam ih ja slikao (sto sam primetio da neki rade). Ako uspes da nadjes molim te postavi --Avala (talk) 13:05, 22 February 2008 (UTC)


Tuđman request move

Hi

Can you help me with this discussion? http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Franjo_Tu%C4%91man#Discussion

--Anto (talk) 16:51, 29 March 2008 (UTC)


Diacritics-arbitration

Hi

I intend to send this argument about spelling the south Slavic names (Franjo Tuđman ,Novak Đoković etc. ) here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration

It seemss it's the only solution! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aradic-en (talk • contribs) 21:56, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Tuzla_column.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Tuzla_column.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Misplaced Pages articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Misplaced Pages:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 05:22, 14 April 2008 (UTC)


Miljevci Plateau

The guy was a Serb paramilitary(Chetnik).it should be mentioned.--(GriffinSB) (talk) 08:10, 18 April 2008 (UTC)


It should be mentioned because Chetnik paramilitaries were responsible for almost every crime in the Balkans. In ww2 there was a difference in killing of a Wehrmacht soldier and a SS troop.--(GriffinSB) (talk) 09:58, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Because he was a paramilitary who was caught during the Free Miljevci Operation.Because in the nearby area serb paramilitaries were responsible for the Lovas massacre and the Skabrnja massacre.--(GriffinSB) (talk) 11:18, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Why do you assume that?I never said it was OK.But in WW2 numerous SS troops were executed who weren't directly involved in crimes. And it is always stated wether the person was a Wehrmacht soldier or a SS troop.

Personaly i think that killing of SS bastards was OK.--(GriffinSB) (talk) 12:00, 18 April 2008 (UTC)


That was in reaction when arguing with some serb ultrannationalists on Srebrenica Genocide article.--(GriffinSB) (talk) 12:21, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Tuzla_column.jpg

Replaceable fair use
Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Tuzla_column.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Misplaced Pages articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Melesse (talk) 06:36, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Imena tenisera

Ima li šanse da se nešto pokrene? Već su mi se javili ljudi koji su zainteresovani za promenom. Slabo poznajem ovdašnju situaciju po pitanju pokretanja glasanja. --Pockey (talk) 13:35, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

On green lights

Saw your comment at Pokrajac's talk page. All I did was revert bad moves - the names were correct, they'd been there for over 2 years without a single complaint on their talk pages, and there hadn't been sufficient discussion. While I will strongly advocate keeping diacritics as an editor, I'm not in charge of anything here, just another admin, and my action shouldn't be seen as a green light for any other (unless it's in fact a continuation of the same action, i.e. resetting back any I somehow missed). Anything else requires consensus and I wouldn't suggest using the current debate as a means to achieve any other renames which may be controversial. Indeed, it was the precise non-controversiality of these ones that allowed me to act. Orderinchaos 13:05, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

I'm in full agreement with you. My own position is pretty much what is contained in the proposal at User:Iricigor/UE. I was just urging caution with regard to seeing my corrective action as a green light for anything. Orderinchaos 16:59, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

hu:Magyar–török háború (1521–26)

Szervusz! Ezt a cikket készülök a magyar wikipédián kiemelté tenni. Ehhez kapcsolódóan van sok csata ami a mostani Szerbia és Horvátország területén zajlott. Próbáltam kapcsolatba lépni a délszláv wikiken szerkesztőkkel, hátha tudnak forrásokat keresni és nekem közölni, de nem kaptam segítséget. Te tudnál segíteni? Doncsecz (talk) 11:59, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Was bewilder the category, that Hungarian Wikipedians. Awfully sorry! Doncsecz (talk) 13:52, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

Proposal to amend WP:UE

I just made a draft of a proposal to amend WP:UE to avoid "reliable source" misuse. Take a look and tell me what do you think. Admiral Norton 23:33, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Bombing of Belgrade in World War II

Can you give a rationale for the split that you proposed for Bombing of Belgrade in World War II. Reply at Talk:Bombing of Belgrade in World War II. Cheers. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 05:09, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Stole Aranđelović

Hi. Thanks for helping with the correct name of this actor and adding to his filmography. I see you come from Yugoslavia and work on the Serbian wiki. Is it correct to categorize this actor as a Serbian actor (instead of a Yugoslavian actor)? Thanks. Lugnuts (talk) 17:24, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for your help. Lugnuts (talk) 08:22, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Image:Albert_dock_at_night.jpg (see my question on the Help desk

You uploaded this image last summer, but it appears to be a copy from an earlier image uploaded in April. Did you migrate this to the Commons and forget to change the authors name in the template? -Mgm| 12:05, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

Re: Montenegro

Out of the blue, I'd say 1296 - Mulutin's edict to the Saint Vranjina monastery (Lake Skadar).

However, the online mixup (if your result is googling) might be the old website of the Montenegrin government ( http://www.montenegro.yu/podaci/geografija.htm ). And thus, loads of others called upon this and took it over. Remember also, that Milutin was an Uros as well - this might be significant to the problematic.

I promise I'll respond to you tonight, I shall contact my sources and try to get a hold of some big and old books by then.

As for the latter, yeah, I have most of them. Why? --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 08:15, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

I don't see anything POV, but to tell the full truth, I haven't seen much of the article myself really (didn't have the time for it).
However, I do think that the article should really use 3-4 more references (for the long historical part), to be a featured article. I, perhaps, might be able to help you with that, also... --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 08:47, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
I couldn't agree more, but Misplaced Pages is such - it requires that such a long section should have a corresponding number of references at least. Search for the things that are not a part of common knowledge about Montenegro (for anyone who possesses decent knowlege).
Oh, and I did that which you asked me back then, in case you missed. --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 10:25, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

Pomoć!

Molim te, obrati pažnju na par članaka takođe!

To su:

Ulpiana, Pančić's Peak‎, Šarplaninac‎, Đeravica‎, Šar Mountains‎, i naravno manastiri... Šarplaninac pogotovu, ubacuje neki citat koji nije uopšte relevantan za ovaj članak, ne zna se šta navodi...

Ne znam kome još da se obratim, ali vidi, zamolio bih za watch, imam užasnih problema sa tim jednim idiotom, baš neću da mu popustim! User:Illyriandescendant... Hvala puno, unapred!!

Tadija (talk) 22:35, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

pomoć

Bojane, molim te reci neku lepu reč za ovu promenu...

Talk:Tromegja,_peak

Hvala, pozz, Tadija (talk) 22:25, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Re: Stjepan Filipović

Rado bih pomogao jer sam čuo za Filipovića (iako moja generacija to više nije učila u školi), no izgleda da se taj IP neće smiriti dok mu ne nađemo neke izvore o Filipoviću. S time ustvari imam problema. Admiral Norton 16:52, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

To je bar lako: ako započne edit war, revertati ćemo ga pa prijaviti na WP:ANI/3RR. Admiral Norton 17:09, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Re

pa ne vraćam se uređivanju članaka, jer mi je dosta da se raspravljam sa svakakvim budalama, ali pošto vidim da moje mape ni posle 2 godine niko nije dirao, onda se svakako vraćam crtanju mapa. a kakve mape misliš da treba nacrtati? PANONIAN 09:57, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

nisu u pitanju samo rasprave, jer pre nego sto sam otišao sa Vikipedije nekoliko hrvatskih i mađarskih korisnika su se udružili protiv mene (čak sam video da pričaju o tom udruživanju u privatnim razgovorima), pa su počeli da me progone, da prate moje izmene i onda da menjaju sve što ja promenim, a na kraju su pravili i lažne korisničke naloge sa kojima su sami sebe vređali i onda optuživali mene administratorima da su to moji lažni nalozi i da ih to ja vređam i da me treba zbog toga blokirati - sa tako bolesnim ljudima je stvarno nemoguće ovde raditi, pogotovo zato što ne postoji sistem da se takvom ponašanju stane na put i to je velika mana ovog projekta. što se tiče mapa, trenutno planiram da nacrtam mape svih opština vojvodine, zatim da popravim neke moje ranije mape sa čijim kvalitetom nisam skroz zadovoljan, a onda ćemo videti šta ću raditi dalje. inače, u Beočinu sam bio nedavno poslom, da sam znao da ti trebaju slike, slikao bih, ali sada ne znam kada ću opet ići tamo. pozdrav. PANONIAN 22:00, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
iskreno, nemam sad ni toliko vremena za rad na Vikipediji kao ranije, jer sada imam mnogo više obaveza u životu. ako stignem možda nešto novo i napišem (evo danas sam sredio članak o Novom Naselju na sr Vikipediji jer je bio stvarno kratak). Inače, ako baš hoćeš da središ članke o Novom Sadu na sr Vikipediji, imaš na en Vikipediji materijala o tome koji možeš da prevedeš (na primer u člancima o delovima grada). i da pitam i ja tebe nešto: jel znaš možda gde mogu naći mapu granica srezova u Vojvodini 1931 godine? PANONIAN 20:36, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Re

I can make such maps, of course, but since I am bussy with other things right now, you will have to wait a while until I find time for that. PANONIAN 20:49, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Re: NS

Bulevar Cara Lazara, slikano je sa Limenske strane, a zgrade su Grbavica :) Zar nisi ti iz NSa :P --Göran S (talk) 13:42, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

tj, zeznuo sam se, hehe. :) To ti je raskrsnica Bulevara Jase Tomica i Rumenacke, znaci Detelinara je to. Mada nemoj tu sliku koristiti, posto te kuce sa leve strane vise nema, a i to gradiliste sa desne strane ne postoji, posto je zgrada je vec izgradjena. Slikacemo ponovo, ako treba. :) --Göran S (talk) 13:45, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

wikipedia.org in English

Hallo,BokicaK

may I remind you,that you are at wikipedia.org,the English page. So any contributions should be written in English, in respect to English speaking readers all over the world. Thank you for cooperation.--Speidelj (talk) 20:47, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Whatever... -- Bojan  20:49, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Najljepša hvala!--Speidelj (talk) 22:01, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Podgorica

Well, I could add some information on the Medieval Age & fix it up.

As for that, if I see, that has already been solved over at the Serbian Misplaced Pages (J. Erdeljanovic). --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 09:01, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Izgubišmo...

E, jeb'ga.. --94.250.46.190 (talk) 18:06, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello BokicaK! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current 29 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

  1. Božidar Delić - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 07:18, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Vujosevic

I added Montenegrin-Serbian. I hope that is good to stop this war? Rave92 18:00, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

Cultural Property of Great Importance

Hello!
I noticed you've made edits to Cultural Property of Great Importance articles or that you are in some way connected to Serbia and Cultural Heritage. I thought you may be interested in joining
WikiProject Cultural Property of Great Importance

We are a group of editors working to improve Misplaced Pages's coverage of topics related to Serbian Cultural Property of Great Importance. Please take a look to edit an article or add one of your own. If you would be interested in joining feel free to visit the Participants Page!
Thank You. Tadija 19:04, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for joining! See Project main page for more information, or ask me! All best!

Cultural PropertyThis user participates in
WikiProject
Cultural Heritage of Serbia.

You may use it on your page, or just leave it here! :) --Tadija 19:16, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

ANI

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. -- ◅PRODUCER (TALK) 22:55, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

Zdravo Bane

Vidim da je započeto glasanje na Wikipediji da korisnik Željko T. postane admin. Molim te izjasni se. A, onda da li mi možeš pomoći da članak IMH Belgrade unapredim, i posle stavim na glasanje za dobar ili sjajan. Imam i problem oko članka Psihijatrija danas, molim te pomozi mi. Pozdrav --Aleksa Lukic (talk) 14:32, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Nenad Manojlović

The article Nenad Manojlović has been proposed for deletion because under Misplaced Pages policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Misplaced Pages:Referencing for beginners or ask at Misplaced Pages:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. PoeticVerse (talk) 04:53, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

o

hello my brother, kako je Filip Pejković --Стефан Немањић (talk) 17:55, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

I predict you will soon banned here. Enjoy while you can. -- Bojan  Talk  03:51, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

koliko mi traje blok na srb. wiki --Стефан Немањић (talk) 10:41, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
Are you here administrator --Стефан Немањић (talk) 17:35, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
Da li je aktivan Rastko Pocesta --Стефан Немањић (talk) 17:44, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
neka, neću ja da se svađam sa njim, želeo bih samo malo da porazgovaramo. pošto sam blokiran na srp. viki, malo sam je prelistao, i video sam da je pisao članak o sebi. a reci mi da li se aktivirao skoro --Стефан Немањић (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 18:06, 2 June 2010 (UTC).
samo da ti kažem, na srpskoj vikipediji mi je obrisan članak Oštrivojevići, ar razlog je besmislice. Oštrivojevići jesu bili srpska dinastija, pogledaj www.youtube.com/JovanDeretić i poslušaj Deretića da vidiš šta će da ti kaže --Ћофи (talk) 17:46, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
I trebalo je obrisu clanak. Dosadjivanje sa Dereticem je prelilo casu, zbog toga si/ćeš biti blokiran. -- Bojan  Talk  17:58, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

da li bi mogao da me oslobodiš blokade jedno vreme, da pitam nešto jednog korisnika, a ako nećeš, odna bih te molio da mu ti ostaviš poruku korisnik je Nikolaslivka, a vezano je za deretića --Ћофи (talk) 14:56, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

May Overthrow

I like the aftermath section you added to the article. It looks much better now. I rated it C-class. With more work, it could be easily rated B-class.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 13:33, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you so much for the barnstar, I really appreciate it!--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 06:14, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Black Hand

I have posted the question of Black Hand's formation date over at Misplaced Pages:Reference desk/Humanities. Hopefully someone will provide an accurate answer. If it was indeed formed in 1911 as Misplaced Pages's article says, we'll have to change the wording on the May Overthrow as well as releated articles.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 12:33, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

hitno

molio bih te da pitaš korisnika Nikolaslivka, na srb. wiki. ,da li može da pita Deretića ko su Amerikanci, i da mu kažeš da Filip Pejković pita. Molio bih te, hitno --Ћофи (talk) 12:40, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

ja bih pitao bih ja sam, ali sam blokiran --Ћофи (talk) 12:12, 17 June 2010 (UTC)--Ћофи (talk) 12:12, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
onda mi skini blok na srp. wiki. ja cu sam da ga pitam, pa me blokirajte opet --Ћофи (talk) 12:40, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
ma neću da uređujem članke, pišem knjigu, samo me odblokirajte da mogu da kažem nešto Nikolaslivka --Ћофи (talk) 12:53, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

nisi fer. Pišem knjigu, radim kao koautor na knjizi, i sad zbog tebe ne bi mogao da kontaktiram Deretića. Srećom snašao sam se. tebi hvala ni na čemu. samo reci Pocesti, ako se skoro aktivira, da hoću da razgovaram sa njum. hvala ti puno --Filip Srbin (talk) 21:32, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

Jebote Rastko Pocesta vise. Mogu da mislim na sta lice te vase knjige. -- Bojan  Talk  08:26, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Alo

zbog ove psovke, biću prinuđen da te prijavim administratoru jer se osećam ugroženo. Mi bar nešto i radimo, a živo me interesuje žta će od tebe da bude --Filip Srbin (talk) 10:27, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

I'm glad that You reported me. I somehow believe You would be blocked eternally. -- Bojan  Talk  10:58, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
ovo ti neće tek tako proći. već sam se žalio na tebe na srp. viki. očekuj oduzimanje administraorskih prava. hteo sam da te pitam, pre nego što si me blokirao, i time zloupotrebio administraotrsko pravo, da se angažujemo na nekom zajedničkom prjektu, ali avaj, budali ne vredi objašnjavati --Filip Srbin (talk) 11:00, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
I'll repeat: I'm glad you reported me, now everybody will pay attention on you. You would be banned here, too. -- Bojan  Talk  11:05, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Pitanje

da li je Rastko Pocesta, isti kao i korisnik Don Rastko Pocesta --95.180.20.197 (talk) 18:08, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

svojim potezom na srp. wiki. si još jednom dokazao da zloupotrebljavaš funkciju --Filip Srbin (talk) 15:12, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

M'rš. -- Bojan  Talk  15:48, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

aj me odblokiraj da pitam nešto Nikolu Šljivića --Filip Srbin (talk) 10:32, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

Vote

You should explain your vote in few sentences, as per propositions of the vote. Only votes will be no useful. --Tadija 13:56, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

Montenegro national basketball team edit war.

I highly suggest you get the guy blocked for using so many sock-puppets - the joy of using dynamic IP addresses. *snicker* Judging from the IPs' contributions, it seems to me that the IPs belong to none other than Rave92. Perhaps take it up to the Administrators' noticeboard? Cheers! --Kilibarda (talk) 16:26, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

WP:AIV.

Hey, I blocked the three IP addresses you listed for 48 hours each; I'll have to trust you that they were actually vandalizing since I've no clue as to the topic, so I thought I'd warn you that this one still has unreverted edits. By the way, just as a note for the future, if you could report the IPs using three different requests, that'd be a bit easier for us admins (and I imagine the bot might run into a problem if we don't block all of them or something, not sure). Cheers, · Andonic 08:27, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, in most cases flags do denote citizenship. · Andonic 08:46, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
He seems to be skipping around articles, so I semi-protected for three days; in this case shorter protections to the articles he attacks are probably preferable to long protections, since he'll probably not be in short supply of targets and we don't want half the Balkan sports articles on[REDACTED] protected for a month if we can avoid it. · Andonic 14:23, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
Ah okay, didn't know that was the case; I've added the three pages to my watchlist for now. I don't know how flagged revisions work either, I just came back after a two year retirement. >.< · Andonic 14:58, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
Added as well. · Andonic 16:34, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
Want me to protect again? · Andonic 20:45, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
Alright, I'll give you a couple of months on each article then. Might as well. · Andonic 23:22, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
Did I miss any? Montenegro national basketball team, PBC CSKA Moscow, Template:PBC CSKA Moscow, Template:Montenegrin National Basketball Team roster. · Andonic 23:32, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

File move to commons

Can you move this file to Wikimedia Commons using some bot: http://en.wikipedia.org/File:Novi_sad_quarters_depresija.jpg PANONIAN 12:04, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

E, ako možeš prebaciti i ovih nekoliko fajlova:

To su jedine mape koje sam ja radio a da još nisu prebačene sa en Wiki na ostavu. Kad ih prebacimo, zamoliću nekog administratora da ih ovde obriše. PANONIAN 19:47, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

Bugojno

Shit may happen everywhere, but for a small obscure town, don't you think this story of the teenager and the puppies is worth mentioning? EclecticEnnui (talk) 06:20, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

Serbian war crimes split

Hi there. You contributed to Talk:Serbian war crimes/Archive 1 when the article was still a big mess as a whole. Now it's split into three, which may or may not be salvageable. So please do apply your comments to the new articles Serbian war crimes in the Balkan Wars, Serbian war crimes in World War II, Serbian war crimes in the Yugoslav Wars. --Joy (talk) 13:18, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

invite to discuss Kosovo geographic names

I am working on a list of issue and a stragtegy for the names of places in kosovo , User_talk:Mdupont#Naming_and_status_of_Kosovo_pages I would like to invite you to take part and comment, have seen your activity of kosovo articles in the past. Thanks, mike James Michael DuPont (talk) 12:12, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

May Overthrow

Hi BokicaK -- Thanks for your note. It is very difficult to learn a foreign language well enough to write in it. It is certainly impressive, considering the difficulty of the English language, that you have grasped the language enough to write what you have. Nonetheless, it still needs to be copy edited by a proficient English speaker, and because of some of the text is unclear, it requires someone who is also knowledgeable in the subject matter. Alternatively, any English speaker could go through the article point by point with you and ask questions regarding what is unclear. Personally, I could try to do that, but I'm about to go on a trip for the American Thanksgiving holiday. As far as the title goes, it may well be that even though Serbian uses a different word for "coup," that's still the best translation in this case. We need to find out what English-language historians who have written about Serbia call the event. -- Mwalcoff (talk) 23:32, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

Forward converter drawings

I created and downloaded some images onto the talk page of Forward converter . Let me know (on the article's talk page) if these help you, hinder you, have errors, etc. Any other suggestions or comments are welcome. Thanks, BillWvbailey (talk) 22:21, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

How would you know that it is a forward converter by looking at a photo of it? It could as well be a Flyback converter or (I've done this too) both simultaneously, i.e. using both the forward-derived current as well as the flyback-derived energy-as-current -- I've got 5 operating on my back porch right now. Given that a flyback converter is much simpler, what you think should be a forward converter (such as a cell phone charger) might not be one, after all. If you want I could photograph my little converter (works on a 1 1/2 volt battery, is similar to what the US calls a "flashlight" or the Europeans call a "torch"). But also, such a photo is not terribly representative. I used to work for a company that built forward converters (double-forwards) that operated at kilowatt power levels, for plasma cutting, and they weighed about 20 kg. BillWvbailey (talk) 19:13, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
Yes, I will give you a picture. You can be free to use it or even copy the circuit (if you want the circuit -- I will give you only the photo at first because . . . . we may be offending the guardians of "Original Research".) I will do this tomorrow, when the sun is shining (it's night now, and it's snowing). Cheers! Bill Wvbailey (talk) 23:23, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

The picture(s) are at the article now. Get them quick before the OR police come along and complain. BillWvbailey (talk) 18:58, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

Hello

Hello there - thank you for linking up commons on many pages - however would it be possible for you to add them above page footers in the future. As editors are having to move the template up from this layout to this layout. Again thanks for your editsMoxy (talk) 07:25, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/HelenTheBouchard

Hello. I apologize for creating mess, I never started checkuser case on en.wiki. You are first active checkuser that I stumbled upon, can you look up into the request? -- Bojan  Talk  06:49, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

Thanks, I've taken a look, and blocked the account. Don't worry about the format of the case pages, they are admittedly rather complicated. :)
Cheers, Amalthea 11:37, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

Radmanovic

The reason for my edit is that people keep going back and forth between calling him Serbian and calling him Bosnian. A good, clear source would certainly be helpful. Zagalejo^^^ 22:38, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 7 March 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 14:12, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 March 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 00:41, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Lybia_and_POV

Hi there.

I noticed your comments regarding the news item, on Misplaced Pages talk:In the news, and I added more comments and asked for an admin to look at it .

The discussion was moved to Misplaced Pages:ERRORS#Lybia and POV - where it would get faster attention - and now, the main page has been changed . I hope you think that the change resolves the problem you raised. Thanks,  Chzz  ►  18:43, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

You wrote on my user talk page, Thanks, but i'm not still satisfied. -- Bojan  Talk  03:04, 22 March 2011 (UTC).
I am not sure what you mean. Is this about the ITN article? Would you like me to help with something? Please let me know. Thanks,  Chzz  ►  10:21, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 21 March 2011


Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 00:27, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

Sasha Pavlovic

What should we list as Pavlovic's nationality - Serbian or Montenegrin? Zagalejo^^^ 20:10, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 March 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 00:32, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 4 April 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 00:27, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 April 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 09:15, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 April 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 05:36, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 April 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 23:33, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 2 May 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 22:18, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 9 May 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 00:48, 10 May 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 May 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 00:49, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 May 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 01:09, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 May 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 19:04, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 6 June 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 00:17, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 13 June 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 00:27, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 June 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 14:53, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 June 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 00:32, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 4 July 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 10:24, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 July 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 00:23, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 July 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 00:18, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 July 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 22:25, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

Read FINA rules

Talk:Water polo at the 2011 World Aquatics Championships – Men's tournament. Sebjarod (talk) 20:02, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 01 August 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 00:25, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 08 August 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 22:58, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 15 August 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 08:23, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

Death of 12 newborn babies in Banja Luka

Since there is an ungoing edit war going on on the Death of 12 newborn babies in Banja Luka article, it would be helpful if your additions provided reliable sources. The Mark of the Beast (talk) 19:56, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 22 August 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 23:15, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Death of 12 newborn babies in Banja Luka

The article Death of 12 newborn babies in Banja Luka has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NOTNEWS

While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tbhotch. Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 21:14, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Death of 12 newborn babies in Banja Luka for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Death of 12 newborn babies in Banja Luka is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Death of 12 newborn babies in Banja Luka until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Tbhotch. Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 21:49, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 August 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 07:44, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

Request for Move

Hi! I would like to join these discussions about Request for Move: Talk:Natasa Janics, Talk:Christina Vukicevic, Talk:Milos Raonic, Talk:Kristina Mladenovic, Talk:Alex Bogdanovic, Talk:Irena Pavlovic, Talk:Andrea Petkovic. Greetings and thanks! :) --Aca Srbin (talk) 22:15, 1 September 2011 (CEST)

The Signpost: 05 September 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 23:28, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

Invitation

Invajtujem te da glasas na Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Montenegrin alphabet. Ziveo srpski jezik! --93.87.8.45 (talk) 16:58, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

Iako je glupost, nema smisla brisati. -- Bojan  Talk  04:25, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 12 September 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 23:08, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 19 September 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 09:18, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 September 2011


Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 00:55, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 3 October 2011


Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 04:48, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

User:Autobot

I have blocked this account because it is an unapproved bot account. Once it gets approved through the WP:BAG, another admin can unblock the account.--v/r - TP 13:37, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

No, I don't when it's rocking a {{bot}} template calling itself a legitimate bot account.--v/r - TP 22:22, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, BokicaK. You have new messages at TParis's talk page.
Message added 23:11, 10 October 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

v/r - TP 23:11, 10 October 2011 (UTC) x2

The Signpost: 10 October 2011


Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 02:04, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 17 October 2011


Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 09:58, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 October 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 10:13, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 October 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 16:53, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 7 November2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 11:58, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 November 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 22:08, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 21 November 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 00:28, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 November 2011

The Signpost: 05 December 2011

The Signpost: 12 December 2011

The Signpost: 19 December 2011

The Signpost: 26 December 2011

The Signpost: 02 January 2012


The Signpost: 09 January 2012

The Signpost: 16 January 2012


Ruđer Bošković

Pošto nisam registorvan, zamolio bih te da vratiš podatke o Ruđeru i reference o njegovm srpskom poreklu, a tome možeš da dodaiš i izjavu srpskog predsednika za hrvatske medije.

Takođe, možeš da dodaš i redirekciju za Astronomsko društvo Ruđer Bošković iz Beograda (Astronomical Society "Rudđer Bošković") — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.86.93.29 (talk) 03:35, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

Hvala unapred!

www.vjesnik.hr/Article.aspx?ID=2CDE06FB-A0B1-455D-ABD0-BBE345B33A8E 03:30, 18 January 2012

To sto kaže Tadić ili što bi rekla Jadranska Kosor ne znači ništa. Treba ti jaci izvor. Ja ti mogu prevesti nesto. Iz nekog razloga Vikipedija mi ne dozvoljava da sad napravim redirekciju. Ne znam da li to ima veze sa SOPA. Napravicu kada ovo prodje. -- Bojan  Talk  04:56, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 January 2012

The Signpost: 30 January 2012

The Signpost: 06 February 2012

The Signpost: 13 February 2012

The Signpost: 20 February 2012

SR Wiki

Jel ću imati neke šanse da mi se smanji blok na SR Wiki? -- Velimir Ivanovic talk 23:27, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Kolike su šanse kad se promenim da mi se smanji blok? -- Velimir Ivanovic talk 23:32, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Kako da ih ubedim? Ako pišem članke kao anoniman da li će mi se to priznavati? -- Velimir Ivanovic talk 23:47, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Izvunuću se svima samo mi reci kome trebam tačno. Kako da postavim korisničke kutijice na EN Wiki? -- Velimir Ivanovic talk 00:05, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

Bosnian Barnstar of National Merit
For your cleanup work and help on Bosnian geography articles and ex-Yugloslavia! Keep it up! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:21, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

Can you also remove the brackets from the intro where applicable like this? Thanks! Keep up the good work and happy editing!♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:57, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

We could really do with new maps of the Serbian and Bosnian municipalities. File:Serbia Temerin.png for instance would look far better on the svg type map of Serbian which appears in the pin maps but with municipalities outlined and then the municipality shaded in red. The pink and other strange colours are ugly, I'm sure you'll agree. I'll have to enquire into that. Like this although red rather than yellow!♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:06, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

Tough one that, not sure. But Kosovo appears to be accepted by every nation as independent except Serbia. I'd say the NPOV would be affected more by including Kosovo on the map as it would look pro-Serbian, especially as the UN recognizes it as independent. Personally I dislike seeing nations splitting, not to mention the problem it causes on[REDACTED] with having to adjust things! I'd say shading in the Kosovo outline in a different colour would be the best thing to acknowledge Serbia's dispute but still outlined as separate.♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:21, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

Howz this? . Should be easy to create locators from there.♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:34, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

Like File:Municipalities of Serbia Sombor.png. Don't know though if I have the patience to do the lot but I'll see, it certainly won't all be done in one day!♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:45, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

Mmm Template:Infobox Serbia municipality prevents me from changing it. I think it should be converted to standard infobox settlement to allow flexibility.♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:47, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

I am aware that you would simply have to change the parameter for image to feature the maps as long as they are consistent. I'll see what I can do, can't promise anything.♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:56, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

Good news is that I've made all the maps. just have to muster the energy the upload the remaining 132 maps. If you could be here tomorrow to change the template to switch maps I'd be grateful. I'll hopefully load most later tonight.♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:17, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

There's 160 maps here. I've made the switch and boosted to 250px, same size as the pin maps.♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:35, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

Give me a list of ones needing doing and I'll look into it this week.♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:13, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

I haven't got any tools though for making quality maps. They'll have to be duplicates of the current.♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:25, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

Problem sa šablonima

Primetio sam da postoji problem sa prikazom slike u nekim šablonima koje si stavljao u članke. Na primer, u članku Maglić je prethodni šablon prikazivao sliku (pogledaj staru verziju članka: ), dok se u novom šablonu ta slika ne vidi: . Probao sam to da popravim u članku Mokrin i jedino što sam uspeo je to da sliku izvadim iz šablona. Možeš li da popraviš taj problem? PANONIAN 05:11, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Drugi problem je da novi šablon ne pokazuje ćirilične nazive, vidi staru i novu verziju šablona. PANONIAN 05:23, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
Mislim, nemoj se ljutiti, ali trebalo bi da prekontrolišeš svoje izmene u člancima gde si zamenio šablon "Geobox" sa "Infobox settlement" i da popraviš ove probleme, jer su sada neki članci ostali bez slike i bez ćiriličnog naziva. PANONIAN 05:30, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
Nisam video tvoj odgovor pre mog zadnjeg komentara. Mislim da nije problem samo u ta tri članka, jer samo te sam pogledao - problem verovatno postoji svugde gde je stavljen šablon "Infobox settlement" (ukoliko je u prethodnom šablonu postojala slika ili ćirilični naziv). PANONIAN 05:32, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Hm, što se tiče šablona za naselja Srbije, umesto kolone "Municipality" treba da stoji "Municipality or city", jer neke bivše opštine sada imaju status gradova. Možeš li to da promeniš pomoću bota? PANONIAN 17:54, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

Takođe bi mogao i za naselja van Vojvodine da dodaš kolonu za statistički region, kao i da kod naselja Vojvodine umesto "Province" piše "Region" (odnosno da kolona "Region" postoji kod svih naselja Srbije). Tako stoji na sajtu Vlade Srbije: http://www.srbija.gov.rs/pages/article.php?id=45625 PANONIAN 18:02, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
Pa svakako, odradi to kad stigneš, nije problem ako bude u maju. Što se tiče novih statičkih regiona, oni su značajni najmanje koliko i okruzi (a suštinski i više od okruga, jer su veći po površini i broju stanovnika). I sami okruzi nisu oblici lokalne samouprave već upravna područja vlade, kao i statistički regioni. U suštini, Srbija ima 5 statističkih regiona, od kojih Vojvodina, Kosovo i Beograd imaju svoju samoupravu, dok je preostala dva regiona nemaju. Međutim, ta dva regiona se tretiraju isto kao Vojvodina, Kosovo i Beograd. Evo pogledaj zvaničan dokument sa popisa - strane 5 i 6: http://media.popis2011.stat.rs/2011/prvi_rezultati.pdf - to je službena administrativna podela Srbije i tako i mi treba da uradimo ovde (jedino ne bih koristio podelu Srbija Sever i Srbija Jug, jer se na sajtu Vlade pominju samo 5 regiona kao primarna podela Srbije: http://www.srbija.gov.rs/pages/article.php?id=45625 ). Ja ću u međuvremenu "peške" uraditi ovo u par članaka koje budem sređivao, a ti posle sve ostalo možeš srediti sa botom (kad nađeš vremena, naravno). PANONIAN 05:59, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

U suštini, ovo su stvari koje bi po meni bot trebalo da odradi: ,

  • da ubaci i latinično i ćirilično ime naselja u infobox
  • da kod naselja Vojvodine zameni "Province" sa "Region" (ili da doda tu kolonu ako ne postoji)
  • da kod naselja van Vojvodine doda kolonu "Region" i da pomeri okruge i opštine u kolone "subdivision_type2" i "subdivision_type3"
  • da doda okrug i opštinu tamo gde nema
  • da kod opštine zameni opis "Municipality" sa "Municipality or city"
  • da ubaci članke o naseljima u kategoriju opštine u kojoj se nalaze i kategoriju za naselja za svaki okrug: na primer, naselje Đala treba da bude u kategorijama "Novi Kneževac" i "Populated places in North Banat District", dok bi kategorije "Populated places in Vojvodina" i "Populated places in Serbia" trebalo da se isprazne i da se naselja razvrstaju prema okruzima (a za to već postoje posebne podkategorije)

Nadam se da ovo nije previše posla za tebe ili za bota. :) PANONIAN 06:26, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

OK, što se tiče regiona, pogledao si PDF dokument sa popisa? Tamo su naselja upravo razdeljena na način o kome govorim. Znači, jedino je pitanje ovde da li treba ili ne treba da koristimo podelu koja se koristi u zvaničnim dokumentima. Ne slažem se da bi to izazvalo zabunu, jer valjda ljudi treba da nauče novu teritorijalnu podelu Srbije? Naravno da ljude zbunjuje ono što ne znaju. Ajde ovako, pošto je Vojvodina i statistički i administrativni region, da kod Vojvodine napišemo "Region / Province", a kod ostalih samo "Region"? Hm, Beograd bi takođe bio poseban slučaj, jer su tu region i okrug jedno isto, pa mislim da kod naselja Beograda ne treba da postoji kolona "District" već samo "Region", a umesto "Municipality or city" bi trebalo da stoji samo "Municipality". PANONIAN 06:55, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
Pa evo nešto ovako recimo: . Je li to OK varijanta? PANONIAN 07:04, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

Eh, ali to je netačno. Statistički region i autonomna pokrajina su jedan isti administrativni nivo. Znači pogledaj dokument: http://media.popis2011.stat.rs/2011/prvi_rezultati.pdf Ovo su administrativni nivoi:

  • Srbija Sever
    • Vojvodina (i statistički region i autonomna pokrajina)
      • Severni Banat (okrug)
        • Novi Kneževac (opština)
          • Đala (naselje)

Znači Vojvodina je statistički region koji ima status autonomne pokrajine i upravo bi dupliranje tih kolona izazvalo zabunu. PANONIAN 07:55, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

Evo, pogledaj kako tu stoji za Beograd: http://media.popis2011.stat.rs/2011/prvi_rezultati.pdf

  • Srbija Sever
    • Beogradski region (statistički region)
      • Beogradska oblast (okružni nivo)
        • Beograd - Barajevo (opština)
          • Arnajevo (naselje)

Dokument dakle obrađuje sve administrativne nivoe i na primeru Beograda se vidi da su i nivo statističkog regiona i nivo okruga uzeti u obzir (iako predstavljaju potpuno istu teritoriju). Suprotno tome, nije posebno prikazan nivo autonomne pokrajine, što znači da je autonomna pokrajina isti administrativni nivo kao i statistički region. PANONIAN 08:02, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

U suštini prvi administratrativni nivo bi ovde bio Srbija Sever / Srbija Jug i nemam ništa protiv da ubaciš i to u šablon ako želiš (mada mislim da može i bez toga). PANONIAN 08:06, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
E jbg, očigledno se ne razumemo. Jel možemo onda naći neki kompromis? Recimo da kod Vojvodine imamo samo kolonu "Province", dok bi kod naselja u drugim delovima Srbije pisali "Region". Može li tako? Upotreba dve kolone za Vojvodinu bi izazvala potpunu zabunu. PANONIAN 12:02, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
Pa već sam ti predložio kako da rešimo problem Beograda. Ja mislim da treba da se pridržavamo ovog dokumenta: http://media.popis2011.stat.rs/2011/prvi_rezultati.pdf Nije to "samo statistički" dokument, već on tačno odražava teritorijalnu podelu Srbije. Dakle, u tom dokumentu ne postoje odvojeno autonomna pokrajina Vojvodina i statistički region Vojvodina i samim tim bi bilo netačno da imamo posebne kolone za to, na osnovu čega bi ispalo da je statustički region Vojvodina podređen autonomnoj pokrajini Vojvodini - ja ne vidim osnovu za takvo tumačenje. Sa druge strane, kod Beograda imamo okrug, koji je podređen regionu, a oba imaju istu teritoriju. Ja zato mislim da je i kod Vojvodine i kod Beograda najbolje spojiti te iste teritorije u jednu kolonu gde bi kod Vojvodine imali "Province / Region", a kod Beograda "Region / District" (ili možemo izabrati samo jedan opis od ta dva). Stvarno ne vidim osnovu u zvaničnim dokumentima za korišćenje dve kolone za Vojvodinu. PANONIAN 12:20, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
Koga da pitamo? PANONIAN 08:46, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

English

Please use English per WP:SPEAKENGLISH. Thanks.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:23, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

User talk:BokicaK: Difference between revisions Add topic