| Revision as of 23:41, 7 May 2012 editWrit Keeper (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Interface administrators, Administrators26,072 edits this is, at the very most, a quarter serious, so please don't take it badly← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:45, 7 May 2012 edit undoBeyond My Ken (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, IP block exemptions, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers263,582 edits →TroutwhackNext edit → | ||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
| {{trout}} | {{trout}} | ||
| Edit warring is one thing, stupidly lame edit warring is another, but stupidly lame edit warring where you're not even using to ? C'mon now. ] ]] 23:41, 7 May 2012 (UTC) | Edit warring is one thing, stupidly lame edit warring is another, but stupidly lame edit warring where you're not even using to ? C'mon now. ] ]] 23:41, 7 May 2012 (UTC) | ||
| :Trout accepted. Exiting from scene with head bowed. ] (]) 23:45, 7 May 2012 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:45, 7 May 2012
 |
|
The charging bull image
Howdy. With regards to your edit comment here, I disagree with you on the "should have" part. In my opinion, the person who initially put the image in the article in the first place should have added a rationale on the image's page. That being said, I was following the "...the file should be removed from the articles for which it lacks a non-free-use rationale,..." part of the NFCC policy. I could indeed have added the rationale instead, but I chose not to.--Rockfang (talk) 01:18, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
- And I disagree with that choice, as it shifted the solution to a problem you had identified to someone else, per WP:SOFIXIT. Beyond My Ken (talk) 01:30, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
TCM
My edits on Cat Ballou, concerning TCM, should be OK. The references only lead to TCM.com, not TCM.com. I fixed up TCM as it leads to the disambiguation page.--Mjs1991 (talk) 07:18, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
- Looks good to me. Beyond My Ken (talk) 20:35, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
Thank you.
For being a reasonable editor and not just because you acknowkledged what was right about anything I was saying. Also thank you for rescuing the "Charging bull" image by adding the needed rationale for "Fair Use". I had seen that the image lacked a rationale some time ago during a dispute on the Occupy Wall Street poster. I should have added it then. I found the whole subject on how the bull got there and the question of who did it is an interesting peice of art in public places history. So thanks again.--Amadscientist (talk) 20:46, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
- No problem, my pleasure. I hope things at BRD work out to your satisfaction. Beyond My Ken (talk) 20:48, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
- I am just happy that there is some discussion going now that looks very constructive.--Amadscientist (talk) 01:18, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
Otto4711
that chap is the biggest (and stupidest (Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet_investigations/Otto4711/Archive#Report_date_October_23_2009.2C_14:50_.28UTC.29, Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet_investigations/Otto4711/Archive#09_December_2010)) troublemaker in WP history id think. But as for you question the 7... IP i havent run across. Though the 9... IP ive come across different variations thereof. They originated in Madison, WI. See Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Otto4711/ArchiveLihaas (talk) 20:48, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
Troutwhack
|
Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly. |
Edit warring is one thing, stupidly lame edit warring is another, but stupidly lame edit warring where you're not even using the right revision to revert to? C'mon now. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 23:41, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
- Trout accepted. Exiting from scene with head bowed. Beyond My Ken (talk) 23:45, 7 May 2012 (UTC)