Misplaced Pages

User talk:JzG: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 20:36, 9 May 2012 editSilver seren (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers44,083 edits Deletion of L'CHAIM Vodka and Shemspeed: new section← Previous edit Revision as of 20:48, 9 May 2012 edit undoJzG (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers155,107 edits Deletion of L'CHAIM Vodka and Shemspeed: replyNext edit →
Line 113: Line 113:


Please restore both ] and ]. Only L'CHAIM sounded promotional and that was something that could have been easily fixed through normal editing, considering the use of proper references in the article. Shemspeed was definitely not appropriate, considering it was written perfectly well and had a number of secondary sources. Furthermore, the protection of the title is out of process, because there is no evidence of the titles being multi-created after deletion or even the threat of that happening. Again, please restore both of them. <font color="silver">]</font><font color="blue">]</font><sup>]</sup> 20:36, 9 May 2012 (UTC) Please restore both ] and ]. Only L'CHAIM sounded promotional and that was something that could have been easily fixed through normal editing, considering the use of proper references in the article. Shemspeed was definitely not appropriate, considering it was written perfectly well and had a number of secondary sources. Furthermore, the protection of the title is out of process, because there is no evidence of the titles being multi-created after deletion or even the threat of that happening. Again, please restore both of them. <font color="silver">]</font><font color="blue">]</font><sup>]</sup> 20:36, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
* If anyone not being paid to edit L'CHAIM wishes to write a sourced draft then fine, but shemspeed is a vanity article written by a user about their own website (and that user's edits almost all seem to advance their personal commercial interests). The user's vanity autobiography may be kept at AfD, in which case a redirect may be appropriate. I do not bend over backwards to accommodate spammers, sorry. <b>]</b> <small>(])</small> 20:48, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:48, 9 May 2012

Archiving icon
Archives
no archives yet (create)
Gastrich, PRT, October 2005, December 2005, January 2006, January 2006a, February 2006, February 2006a, March 2006, April 2006, May 2006, June 2006, July 2006, September 2006, October 2006, November 2006, December 2006, January 2007, February 2007, March 2007, April 2007, May 2007, June 2007, July 2007, August 2007, October 2007, December 2007, January 2008, February 2008, March 2008, April 2008, May 2008, June 2008, July 2008, August 2008, September 2008, October 2008, November 2008, December 2008, January 2009, February 2009, March 2009, April 2009, May 2009, June 2009, July 2009


Obligatory disclaimer
I work for Dell Computer but nothing I say or do here is said or done on behalf of Dell. You knew that, right?

This user is an administrator on the English Misplaced Pages. (verify)
[REDACTED] This user is one of the 400 most active English Wikipedians of all time.

busy

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

new utopia it realy start not or just a other fraud ?

hi did see you write in the new utopia project maybe you can anwser my quastines i did look around the internet but only find the things belowe so maybe you did have any infomation hmm and why would they sudnetly get investoers now whe its a more of less a fincael crisrs and not ut the 2 booms that have existed in the 17 yeasr the project have existed ...


the offical website did say that in did start construction now maybe it should be update the wikipeida artickel but at the same time it need to update its pasport infomation... the links have not been updated too maybe its should be added in the wiki artick? one of the owner of the domain name was made bankrupt in florida fort meyers court if it get sued for fraud in florida why did the charte citizens get ther office in caymen island (that showes in the youtube video )now when caymen island can give infomation abut amricans convicted of crime ?

when many of the cariben island did give clients lists the last 5 years why did not charter citise get there mony back (if it is a fraud) becuse look like many of them(investoer/conslats/govounoers have mony offshore?

got sued ? what happen to charter citizens? Investors’ did sue them for fraud and made the project somewhere else ? because all the business /project did stop in 2007/2008 and the site did move to flordia then to uk (just look it the dictionary that was the domain name )

sorry for my bad enghlis

murakami — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.147.33.187 (talk) 14:46, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

I have read that he anchored a buoy marking the location of the future island, but that he never started construction. There should be an explanation here, but I can't buy access to the article because I don't live in the US. --Enric Naval (talk) 18:52, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

hmm i dont live there either :(

as you can see on my spelling;)

so maybe put it on the talk page for new utopia or let some of the us writer of the artickel read it a summerys it obe the wiki page ? becuse if its a fraud would not somebody have sued them and won by now, since this have gone on for 15-16 years ? other projects like this have been sued when they faild (freedomship and sobody that was going to build somthing like this oute in the nevada wildernes ) the oceinan/ atlanis project (those that was going to build a libertarian paradise outside florida in the 1990s) did not take money for there membership becuse they was affraid of getting sued...)those that was buy apaements ib UAE gated comunity that never got build are trying to sue ther investoers i guss those proehjects are teh closest of what new utopia was going to be the sea and the outback of dersert uae citys states are maybe the same;) or mayeb its just african militas and foks that dont want to join the miletary and is vagabonds that want a bank accunte in uruguay or tadsjikistan that have citizenships of this project ? murakami


— Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.147.38.2 (talk) 15:06, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
I have no idea if he has been sued or not. We need a reliable source that says "Lazarus Long has been sued for fraud by New Utopia investors". Misplaced Pages can't claim that something is a fraud, we need a reliable source saying "New Utopia is a fraud because of reason X and reason Y".
I think we have some sources saying that the project is unlikely. That it's not likely to be built.
We can only say that he was sued by the SEC sued him because of problems with his bond. --Enric Naval (talk) 15:29, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

did find this

http://www.offshorealert.com/Search.aspx?Term=new+utopia

guess you can dig deep into this if you find more or call the court of fort meyers office ask why one of the new utopia domain adres got delcared bankruot ...

look like this lazarus long did get dead now so maybe easyer to find information now ? and find out what happend to his caymen island office ?

murakami — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.147.38.2 (talk) 16:41, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

That doesn't look like a reliable source. It could give clues to find reliable sources. But I don't think that's very likely.
That would be an international phone call, very expensive. I don't usually make phone calls, because they can't be used as sources for articles. Sometimes I send emails, because they are cheap, and people can send links to sources. But I am not going to spend so much time on this. It doesn't look like I am going to find sources that I can use in wikipedia.
I am most interested in books, articles in business magazines, articles in law journals, etc. Those are very good sources for wikipedia. With those sources it's easy to write interesting articles. I am not going to write more in the New Utopia unless I can find more of those sources. --Enric Naval (talk) 18:06, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Hello. I am attempting to make you happy with a kitten so I can then ask you how I can create the Cube World page. I won't spam. I just want to make it because I am working on the game Cube World and want to show it on here.

PlannedBoredom (talk) 23:37, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Teh evil kitteh made me do it. Guy (Help!) 22:56, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

That was smart

I like your solution to the Anupam issue at ANI, which I would hate to have tried to close. No topic ban as yet, but the next problematic edit gets a block at the discretion of the blocking admin. That's almost as tight as an actual topic ban, but doesn't trample on the valid opinions of the dissenters. Clever :-) -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:16, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

  • Thank you. I believe that 7 years block free qualifies for the basic courtesy of allowing him a genuine opportunity to address the issue, while recognising that it really does have to stop. If I have got it right I will no doubt be attacked by all sides :-) Guy (Help!) 12:18, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

Re:Notice of restrictions

Dear User:JzG, thank you for the information on my talk page. I will do my best to work with others on the paraphrasing/plagiarism issue and will be careful to adhere to WP:NPOV and WP:DUE. With the mix of supports and opposes at ANI, I think you made a well informed decision. To please the Misplaced Pages community, I will also be taking a break for some time, in order to reflect on these issues. I hope you have a nice day sir. With regards, Anupam 15:09, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

Deletion of L'CHAIM Vodka and Shemspeed

Please restore both L'CHAIM Vodka and Shemspeed. Only L'CHAIM sounded promotional and that was something that could have been easily fixed through normal editing, considering the use of proper references in the article. Shemspeed was definitely not appropriate, considering it was written perfectly well and had a number of secondary sources. Furthermore, the protection of the title is out of process, because there is no evidence of the titles being multi-created after deletion or even the threat of that happening. Again, please restore both of them. Silverseren 20:36, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

  • If anyone not being paid to edit L'CHAIM wishes to write a sourced draft then fine, but shemspeed is a vanity article written by a user about their own website (and that user's edits almost all seem to advance their personal commercial interests). The user's vanity autobiography may be kept at AfD, in which case a redirect may be appropriate. I do not bend over backwards to accommodate spammers, sorry. Guy (Help!) 20:48, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
Category:
User talk:JzG: Difference between revisions Add topic