Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 22:45, 15 May 2012

• WP:AN/3
• WP:AN3
• WP:AN/EW
• WP:ANEW
• WP:AN/3RR

This page is for reporting active edit warriors and recent violations of restrictions like the three-revert rule.

• See this guide for instructions on creating diffs for this report.
• If you see that a user may be about to violate the three-revert rule, consider warning them by placing {{subst:uw-3rr}} on their user talk page.

You must notify any user you have reported.

You may use {{subst:An3-notice}} ~~~~ to do so.

You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Additional notes

• When reporting a user here, your own behavior will also be scrutinized. Be sure you understand WP:REVERT and the definitions below first.
• The format and contents of a 3RR/1RR report are important, use the "Click here to create a new report" button below to have a report template with the necessary fields to work from.
• Possible alternatives to filing here are dispute resolution, or a request for page protection.
• Violations of other restrictions, like WP:1RR violations, may also be brought here. Your report should include two reverts that occurred within a 24-hour period, and a link to where the 1RR restriction was imposed.

Definition of edit warring

Definition of the three-revert rule (3RR)

Sections older than 48 hours are archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Twinkle's ARV can be used on the user's page to more easily report their behavior, including automatic handling of diffs.

User:PlatonPskov reported by User:Kober (Result: )

Page: Svan people (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: PlatonPskov (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

• 1st revert:
• 2nd revert:
• 3rd revert:

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:

Beyond being an extremely poorly cooperative user, PlatonPskov continues to wage edit war on Svan people, despite

 Comment: ))) Dear! I not attacks you. I against the politic in sciences (in Georgia and the World) ,against language policy of Stalin (assimilation, Georgianisation) in Georgian SSR and now. --PlatonPskov (talk) 17:07, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

Comments:

1. Misplaced Pages:Do not disrupt Misplaced Pages to illustrate a point. Can not hear the arguments, except their own. Playing rules (the war with a party edits GeorgianJorjadze (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log): 1 + 2 - After connecting a mediator, but to no avail -> 1 + 2. --PlatonPskov (talk) 16:50, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
2. The article commented Talk:Svan people arguments and edited - still went to cancel the update in spite of sources --PlatonPskov (talk) 16:54, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but GeorgianJorjadze is not part of the discussion and his arrival on the battlefield was a response to your unilateral edits when the discussion was still going on. We, you and me, have been engaged in the discussion. So it's our responsibility to achieve a consensus and prevent the page from being torn apart in an edit war. I've asked you several times to remain civil and don't implement controversial changes when the discussion is ongoing.--Kober 16:56, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

You see all the one-sided (unilateral) -PlatonPskov (talk) 17:13, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

Admin comment: It is hard to escape the impression that part of the problem here is PlatonPskov's very poor command of English. Competence is required in editing Misplaced Pages, and that includes competence in English. Of course, people with imperfect and non-native command of English are generally welcome on Misplaced Pages (I am one myself), and there are many things people with imperfect English can usefully do, but negotiating complex NPOV issues over how to represent academic consensus in sensitive ideological questions may not be one of them, if one's English isn't sufficient to make one's thoughts clearly understood and to understand others. Question to both participants: do you feel that PlatonPskov's English has been a factor in hampering dispute resolution in this case? Fut.Perf. ☼ 19:17, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

Yes, I do feel that and I have noted this barrier on the article talk page, but I still think this is not the main reason behind his recalcitrance and refusal to accept a number of academic sources I have cited.--Kober 05:35, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

Yes... I am a supporter of the two points of view (oficial and scientific (linguistic)) /WP:neutral point of view/. I do not deny academic sources (that was said). You Kober, reject another point of view scientific (linguistic)). (Games with rules: the requirements of academic sources on the second point of view. Rejecting other sources and logic) --PlatonPskov (talk) 14:07, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

user:GeorgianJorjadze reported by User:PlatonPskov (Result: )

They continued to: 1 + 2. /again user:GeorgianJorjadze/ It is normal? (without discussion and explanation of the reasons). Is there any admins & linguists? --PlatonPskov (talk) 17:58, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

And again and again, non discussion: , , ... + , , , ... How much can you?--PlatonPskov (talk) 18:25, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

User:GPieczenik reported by Tgeairn (talk) (Result:Already blocked for legal threats )

Page: Phage display (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported: GPieczenik (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Time reported: 23:43, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

Diffs are listed from oldest to newest, dates are in UTC

1. 9 May 2012 (edit summary: varied)
2. 16:20, 12 May 2012 (edit summary: "Undid revision 492163973 by Staticd (talk)")
3. 22:59, 12 May 2012 (edit summary: "Undid revision 492163973 by Staticd (talk)")
4. 23:33, 12 May 2012 (edit summary: "Undid revision 492163973 by Staticd (talk)")

• Diff of warning: here, and here
• Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: here
• Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on user talk page: here

—Tgeairn (talk) 23:55, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

• Already blocked (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:38, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

Semi protection request: Can the page phage display be semi-protected against IPs and new users because the user in question has used multiple IPs previously and going by his absolute and arrogant disregard for all forms of[REDACTED] policy, I fear he will disrupt everyones work with edits from a IP or a new account. Thanks. Staticd (talk) 11:55, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

Without showing proof, no, I will not preemptively do so. Let us know if it does happen (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 12:01, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

Ok, he has started re-adding the claims and irrelevant links one example under an IP, not a peep on his talk page. Please semi protect to force some sort of discussion. Editing rights for this editor just enables him to tromp around like a tank while we shout ourselves hoarse on the talk pages. too much inefficiency and wikistress all around. Staticd (talk) 16:57, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

•  Done (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 17:24, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

User:Youreallycan reported by User:Pdfpdf (Result: Malformed driveby)

Page: Andrew Nikolić (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Youreallycan (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Andrew_Nikoli%C4%87&curid=14697520&action=history
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Talk%3AAndrew_Nikoli%C4%87&action=history

Despite unbelievably lengthy discussion on the talk page, Youreallycan seems to be obstructionist, likes to make demonstrably and obviously false statements, and seems to like to edit-war. I've tried to resolve this edit war on the article talk page, but Youreallycan refuses to explain himself, refuses to reply to questions, and refuses to supply references to support his opinions which he presents as facts. When factual counterarguments, with supporting references, are presented to him, he ignores them and presses on editwarring regardless.

He has now taken to making libelous statements, false statements, and accuse me of being a sockpuppet, all without any supporting evidence. I think this is unacceptable, but don't know what to do about it - I've had no response to a help me that I posted over an hour ago.

His talk pages (yes, he has two), seem to suggest that he likes conflict. I don't think he should be rewarded for being more obnoxious than everybody else he encounters. I'm going to bed now. Goodnight, Pdfpdf (talk) 11:19, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

• Declined – malformed report. Please use the "Click here to create a new report" link at the top of this page, which gives a template report, and provide complete diffs. Plus, if you're simply going to drop a partially-formed report and "go to bed" without opportunity for follow-up questions or concerns, then you're really not trying to resolve anything (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:32, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

Jeez. Just close ranks, why dontcha? Why should OffToRioRob get away with stuff just cos he trolls around ANI and Mummy Jimbo's page all day? Another example of one rule for newbies, no rules for "the cogniscenti." 86.135.17.155 (talk) 12:50, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

A single-entry IP from the neighborhood of the banned user "Light current" accuses someone else of trolling. That's rich. ←Baseball Bugs carrots→ 19:08, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

• Block 'em both. Drmies (talk) 17:52, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

Although there are fans of OTRR/YRC's self-appointment to the job of policy policeman, it's hardly "closing ranks" to advise the use of the required format and specific diffs in drawing up what seems to be a litany of serious complaints about his behaviour. Writegeist (talk) 18:01, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

...and I hardly think I would be considered one of those fans. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 18:08, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

The nature of the blocks leaves a great deal to be desired. Cheers. Collect (talk) 23:51, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

18hangar18 reported by User:Nmate (Result: 24 hours)

Page: Miklós Horthy (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: 18hangar18 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

• 1st revert:
• 2nd revert:
• 3rd revert:
• 4th revert:

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Comments:
The user began editing articles like Miklós Horthy, Hungarization and Slovakization that contain contentious pieces of POV material. I tried to invite the user to participate in a discussion on the matter ,however, said user did not listen to me, and continued edit-warring on calling Miklos Horty a facist instead.--Nmate (talk) 14:05, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

• Blocked – for a period of 24 hours. I'll also note that you, Nmate, are at 3 reverts, which is fine, but make sure you don't go over that. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 22:36, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

User:Jabotito48 reported by User:Malik Shabazz (Result: 24 hours)

Page: List of massacres in Israel (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Jabotito48 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

• 1st revert:
• 2nd revert:

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Comments:

This page, like all pages related to the Arab–Israeli conflict broadly construed, is subject to 1RR. See WP:ARBPIA#Further remedies. Editors who violate 1RR may be blocked without warning by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offense. See {{Arab-Israeli Arbitration Enforcement}}, which is on the Talk page of dozens of articles Jabotito48 edits. (Note: the template was not on Talk:List of massacres in Israel at the time of Jabotito48's infraction, but the editor works exclusively in the subject area and should be familiar with it.) I offered Jabotito48 the opportunity to self-revert, but the editor has chosen to ignore my message. — Malik Shabazz /_Stalk 14:17, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

• Blocked – for a period of 24 hours The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 22:30, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

User:MarcusHookPa reported by User:Mr.choppers (Result: )

Page: Subaru Outback (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: MarcusHookPa (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

• 1st revert:
• 2nd revert:
• 3rd revert:
• 4th revert:
• 5th revert: (at redirect page)
• 6th revert: (at redirect page)
• 7th revert: (at redirect, may be over 24 hours but the edit warring continues apace)

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: , in edit summary

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: , ,

Comments:
User also has a history of edit warring and has been warned several times in the past: , . He is currently trying to creat POV forks at Subaru Legacy Outback and Subaru Impreza Outback Sport.  ⊂| Mr.choppers |⊃  (talk) 19:39, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

I see bad behavior here by multiple editors. There are multiple editors and lots of reverts on both sides of this argument. Mr.choppers and others are employing a tactic they have employed in the past - gutting an article in an attempt to force their desire to merge that article with another. It is Wikibullying at its worst. I suggest protecting the article, as well as a bit of discipline behavioral encouragement to the multiple editors involved in the current edit war. Ebikeguy (talk) 22:14, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

User:Bluesatellite reported by User:Itsbydesign (Result: )

Page: The MDNA Tour (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Bluesatellite (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

• 1st revert:
• 2nd revert:
• 3rd revert:
• 4th revert:

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Comments:
User is blindly reverting, removing properly cited information along with fixes to verbiage, wikilink and addition of new material. User also continuously moved article, disregarding Misplaced Pages policy, which was explained on the user's talk page. User made no attempted at a discussion. He/she stated in edit messages about a discussion on the article's talk page. Here, the user directs to a poster using the article of "the", which is not in adherence to policy. User appears to have no regard for policies set forth within Misplaced Pages. Itsbydesign (talk) 11:27, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

I think I just reverted all undiscussed change you have made. You even didn't bother to explain anything on the article's talk page before making change you like. Misplaced Pages is not your own site, every crucial thing should be disucessed first on the article's talk page (not by warning me on my personal talk page). That's it. Bluesatellite (talk) 11:22, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

By the way, I'm not the first person to have problem with your blindly, undiscussed change. Administator should take a look to these WP:3RR violations , before blaming me for this edit-warring. Bluesatellite (talk) 11:43, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

User:70.101.104.207 reported by User:Favonian (Result: 24h)

Page: Oscar Wilde (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: 70.101.104.207 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

• 1st revert:
• 2nd revert:
• 3rd revert:
• 4th revert:
• 5th revert:

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:

Comments:

• Blocked – for a period of 24 hours --slakr 01:22, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

User:PDS Expert reported by User:Acroterion (Result: )

Page: Protective distribution system (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: PDS Expert (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

• 1st revert for IP:
• 2nd revert for IP:
• 3rd revert for IP:

• 1st revert for PDS Expert (immediately after last IP revert):
• 2nd revert for PDS Expert::
• 3rd revert for PDS Expert::

• And another revert from the IP:
  • And now the named account has returned:

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: before and after PDS Expert's latest revert, before PDS Expert removed it. Similar history at Passive optical network, without IP.

Comments:
Long-term promotional edit warring, two reverts today there and three today on passive optical network. The same text has been inserted into protective distribution system over the past couple of months. PDS Expert created Cable manufacturing business earlier today, apparently promoting Cable Management, Inc. (which geolocates to the same place as the IP), which was deleted as spam. Cable Management, Inc. changed their name to "Armored Shield", which figures prominently in the diffs above. The IP and now the named account appear to be trying to place the new trade name into the articles: I find no evidence that the term is generic. PDS Expert has removed the warnings and attempts at discussion from their talkpage. Acroterion (talk) 00:42, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

IP is picking up today where they left off with the named account. Acroterion (talk) 14:54, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

Named account is back after removing my notification of this discussion then reverting as linked above. Acroterion (talk) 15:49, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

User:91.176.223.236 reported by User:GrayFullbuster (Result: )

Page: Naruto (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: 91.176.223.236 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: ]

• 1st revert: ]
• 2nd revert: ]
• 3rd revert: ]
• 4th revert: ]

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: ]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Comments: Besides edit warring, IP also appears to be a sock of Yengamaurice ] given that after said user was warned for possible edit warring, such IP appeared made the same edits, which is reverted edits done by User:Tintor2 and myself. IP and supposed sockmaster also messaged Tintor2 telling them to stop reverting their edits. User and reported IP have already been reported to SPI for likelihood of sockpuppetry given their edits. GrayFullbuster (talk) 06:08, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

User:Cristiano Tomás reported by User:92.36.173.254 (Result: )

Page: Catherine of Braganza (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Cristiano Tomás (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

• 1st revert:
• 2nd revert:
• 3rd revert:
• 4th revert:

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: and (edit summary)

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Comments:

This user is impossible to work with. I have actually begged him to discuss, to no avail. He had been ignoring all my attempts to discuss the issue so I warned him twice (, ) that I would report him for edit warring. He first responded by ignoring the warning and then by saying: go ahead and report me. I am afraid I had no other option. While the reverts did not happen within 24 hours, I believe it is more than obvious that the user has no intention of ever discussing anything with me. 92.36.173.254 (talk) 18:47, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

99.192.75.90, 99.192.61.78, 99.192.75.44 reported by User:Thegreyanomaly (Result: )

Page: Good Crazy (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: 99.192.75.90 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
User being reported: 99.192.61.78 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
User being reported: 99.192.75.44 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

• 1st revert:
• 2nd revert:
• 3rd revert:
• 4th revert:
• 5th revert:
• 6th revert:
• 7th revert:

Additional reverts made after posting this notice

• 8th revert:
• 9th revert:
• 10th revert:

Thegreyanomaly (talk) 22:44, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on other talk pages:

Comments:
This user says the continuity reference to Last Cigarette Ever is WP:OR. I have argued on the talk page that their claims over WP:OR are overrode by WP:Common sense. This IP basically ignored my warning at 17:02, 15 May 2012 (UTC) on User talk:99.192.61.78. They edited as 99.192.61.78 at 17:24, so they should have received my warning before changing IPs. Thegreyanomaly (talk) 22:30, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

Thegreyanomaly has just arrived at this page and does not seem aware that the article has been under attack by a persistant vandal for over two weeks who has registered several one-time-only-use accounts and used a variety of IP addresses to make the same vandalism edits. Reverting vandalism is not a violation of 3RR. 99.192.75.90 (talk) 22:39, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

Just to be clear, it is this IPs opinion that this is vandalism. To me and others this is a policy dispute over WP:OR. Thegreyanomaly (talk) 22:41, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

• Misplaced Pages noticeboards
• Misplaced Pages edit warring