Misplaced Pages

User talk:Raeky: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 03:12, 20 June 2012 editEdwardsBot (talk | contribs)354,693 edits →The Signpost: 18 June 2012: new section← Previous edit Revision as of 03:43, 22 June 2012 edit undoFifelfoo (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers13,796 edits →AE: new sectionNext edit →
Line 108: Line 108:
</div> </div>
<!-- EdwardsBot 0285 --> <!-- EdwardsBot 0285 -->

== AE ==

You have been mentioned at ], Arbitration Enforcement, in relation to sanctions. ] (]) 03:43, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:43, 22 June 2012

Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end.
Start a new talk topic.
This is Raeky's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.
edit count | edit summary usage

Template:Archive box collapsible

The Signpost: 21 May 2012

The Signpost: 28 May 2012

WikiCup 2012 May newsletter

We're halfway through round 3 (or the quarter finals, if you prefer) and things are running smoothly. We're seeing very high scoring; as of the time of writing, the top 16 all have over 90 points. This has already proved to be more competative than this time last year- in 2011, 76 points secured a place, while in 2010, a massive 250 was the lowest qualifying score. People have also upped their game slightly from last round, which is to be expected as we approach the end of the competition. Leading Pool A is Wales Cwmhiraeth (submissions), whose points have mostly come from a large number of did you knows on marine biology. Pool B's leader, Conradh na Gaeilge Grapple X (submissions), is for the first time not our highest scorer at the time of newsletter publication, but his good articles on The X-Files and Millenium keep him in second place overall. Wisconsin Miyagawa (submissions) leads Pool C, our quietest pool, with content in a variety of areas on a variety of topics. Pool D is led by Scotland Casliber (submissions), our current overall leader. Nearly half of Casliber's points come from his triple-scored Western Jackdaw, which is now a featured article.

This round has seen an unusually high number of featured lists, with nearly one in five remaining participants claiming one, and one user, New York City Muboshgu (submissions), claiming two. Miyagawa's featured list, 1936 Summer Olympics medal table, was even awarded double points. By comparison, good article reviews seem to be playing a smaller part, and featured topics portals remain two content-types still unutilised in this competition. Other than that, there isn't much to say! Things are coming along smoothly. As ever, if you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Misplaced Pages talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Misplaced Pages:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 23:42, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 June 2012

re: Nadya Suleman

Your claims of vandalism on my part are are absolutely ridiculous. Please stop leaving unnecessary warnings on my talk page and please stop threatening me with a block of my editing privileges. No policy has been violated on my part, so best of luck if you choose to attempt to go that route. 24.137.71.242 (talk) 12:18, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

admins take blp violations very seriously, and the warn templates I used was appropriate... I'm quite familiar with policy in this reguard. — raekyt 17:29, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
There is no BLP violation. The info was properly sourced.Freshfighter9 01:25, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
Not in the previous edits... the article has recently been taken off page protection from an assult of similar edits, and the talk page of the article discusses them already. It's still mostly rumor and even though these sources are a little better than previous TMZ type articles, they're not without their problems for BLP. — raekyt 11:40, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
Re: the BLP violation, the big policies here we need to abide by are WP:BLPGOSSIP and the reason why we don't need to include something that is just now happening before the movie is even really announced officially or any kind of official information WP:NOTNEWSPAPER. — raekyt 11:52, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
Regarding your most recent reversion on this subject, there was no longer an issue that I can see regarding the credibility of the sources. It seems you even concede that point. It seems you now have an issue with the wording, though I can see nothing wrong with that either. Why not just reword it? Reverting everything you don't agree with isn't productive. From where I sit, you are being rather stubborn on this subject. I'm not going to involve myself any further in this because it's likely pointless, so do what you feel is right.Freshfighter9 20:51, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
Per WP:BRD the whole R, revert, part, means it's ok to revert changes THEN discuss them, and per WP:BLP it's best to err on the side of discussion BEFORE inclusion for controversial or objectionably content. This isn't a trivial addition, this is adding material she herself is cautious about calling porn, so wording needs to be thought out, and again per WP:BLP and WP:NOTNEWSPAPER we don't have to add this material right now, we can wait until things are certain, movie is released and not just rumor... Your welcome to contribute to the discussion I made on the talk page after last revert, if you even saw it, or invite others to comment on my behavior but to just throw out accusations of WP:OWN and other malicious behavior accusations isn't helpful to the discussion. There are routes if you think just adding information for future events about a person on their article, things that hasn't happened, things that news reporters are relying on people named "Bubbles" as their source, and for rumors from tweets of porn stars about future films, is in-line with BLP policies, then please, goahead. Otherwise I recommend caution, patience and prudence when dealing with adding PORNOGRAPHIC information to a BLP. — raekyt 20:59, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
What "future events" are you referring to? The information is question, which you are trying very hard to keep excluded, has clearly already happened. The video was filmed. It's not a rumor. The "malicious behavior accusations" as you refer to them are valid concerns. In fact, a bias in your editing may be present as well. Not an accusation, just an observation.Freshfighter9 16:00, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
Wheres the official anointment from the studio that it was filmed or release date or title or cover art? The articles say it was filmed, but that's all based on rumor most likely stemming from the original TMZ article. — raekyt 22:14, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 June 2012

Re:Question

I don't know of a policy, and I've found that attempting to police userpages (except in the most obvious cases- non-free content being one) leads to an awful lot of upset and drama. My first foray into ArbCom (thankfully just giving some evidence) was because I tried to remove some aggression from a userpage. If you're not comfortable with it being there, I'd recommend just politely asking for it to be removed. J Milburn (talk) 14:51, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Frankly, who cares what someone who can't even spell their username correctly thinks. GDallimore (Talk) 18:20, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

Re:Archiving

Hello User:Raeky! Thanks for your message and for your contributions to Misplaced Pages! I personally do prefer that all my messages are kept on one page. I do appreciate your concern however and wish you the best. With regards, Anupam 05:55, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Raeky. You have new messages at Solarra's talk page.
Message added 04:51, 19 June 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

♥ Solarra ♥ ߷ ♀ Contribs ♀ 04:51, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

WPVA

FYI, I replied to your half-month-old comment on Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Visual arts. You were looking for specific requests however and I was not too specific. Riggr Mortis (talk) 02:16, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 June 2012

AE

You have been mentioned at WP:AE, Arbitration Enforcement, in relation to sanctions. Fifelfoo (talk) 03:43, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

User talk:Raeky: Difference between revisions Add topic