| Revision as of 01:39, 10 September 2012 editJprg1966 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers95,535 edits Message re. Libertarianism and Objectivism (HG) | Revision as of 01:51, 10 September 2012 edit undoJprg1966 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers95,535 edits Notification: Edit warring (HG)Next edit → | ||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| ] Hello, I'm ]. I noticed that you made a change to an article, ], but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to ] to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on ]. Thanks, <!-- Template:Huggle/warn-unsor-1 --> ] ] 01:39, 10 September 2012 (UTC) | ] Hello, I'm ]. I noticed that you made a change to an article, ], but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to ] to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on ]. Thanks, <!-- Template:Huggle/warn-unsor-1 --> ] ] 01:39, 10 September 2012 (UTC) | ||
| ] Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. '''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. | |||
| To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. See ] for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] ] 01:51, 10 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 01:51, 10 September 2012
September 2012
Hello, I'm Jprg1966. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Libertarianism and Objectivism, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Jprg1966 01:39, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Jprg1966 01:51, 10 September 2012 (UTC)