| Revision as of 07:10, 2 May 2006 editTShilo12 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users18,736 edits Persian people, Persian Jews, etc.← Previous edit | Revision as of 08:33, 2 May 2006 edit undoCohesion (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users10,432 edits Talk page messagingNext edit → | ||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
| Racists abound on Misplaced Pages, much to my chagrin, as do quacks and all manner of other proponents of wanton stupidity. If that statement ever prevents me from becoming a bureaucrat, I'll count it as further undeniable proof thereof. People pontificate and pontificate, and usually those who know what they're talking about give up in disgust long before those who clearly haven't the foggiest notion whereof they speak, do so. This can clearly be seen in what is currently going on in the endless moronic discussion on ] where idiots are arguing, with seemingly boundless energy, unfettered by rational thought or the faintest clue what they're talking about, that "Persian Jews" means "Jews who presently live in Iran". I'll look into your request and try to weigh in with a few words of intelligent thought, but I offer no guarantee that they'll be received at all ] has been...] Cheerfully, but disgustedly, in as good of spirits as that can leave either of us, yours, ]<font color="#008000">]</font>]] 07:10, 2 May 2006 (UTC) | Racists abound on Misplaced Pages, much to my chagrin, as do quacks and all manner of other proponents of wanton stupidity. If that statement ever prevents me from becoming a bureaucrat, I'll count it as further undeniable proof thereof. People pontificate and pontificate, and usually those who know what they're talking about give up in disgust long before those who clearly haven't the foggiest notion whereof they speak, do so. This can clearly be seen in what is currently going on in the endless moronic discussion on ] where idiots are arguing, with seemingly boundless energy, unfettered by rational thought or the faintest clue what they're talking about, that "Persian Jews" means "Jews who presently live in Iran". I'll look into your request and try to weigh in with a few words of intelligent thought, but I offer no guarantee that they'll be received at all ] has been...] Cheerfully, but disgustedly, in as good of spirits as that can leave either of us, yours, ]<font color="#008000">]</font>]] 07:10, 2 May 2006 (UTC) | ||
| == Talk page messaging == | |||
| Hi, it was brought to my attention that you had posted the same message to a large number of user pages regarding the POV dispute on ]. I will try and explain how these sorts of disputes are usually resolved so that you can better understand the processes we have in place. First the talk page on the individual article is the first place you should go if you have a dispute about something that pertains to that article specifically, as this does. This may sometimes seem slow, as you will very often have to wait a number of days for a full response. This is normal, and you shouldn't escalate the situation just because no one responds in a few hours for example. | |||
| If you are dealing with an article that gets little or no attention, or you are in an argument that you think needs a few more voices use ]. This is a centralized place for people to see situations that might need further input. The point of both of these processes is to have the information on the page in which it is most relevant. While it might seem like a fast solution to leave a message on 50 people's talk page, it's not looked upon well by the community because it decentralizes the discussion to which everyone might want to be a contributor. For example what if 30 of those people start having conversations with you on their talk page, that quickly becomes unmanageable. I hope I have explained the reasoning behind how these things are usually done. I'm going to go ahead and revert the messages, you should probably list your arguments on ] if you haven't already. If you want to read more about it have a look at ]. If you have any other questions let me know. - ''']''' 08:33, 2 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 08:33, 2 May 2006
This is a good place to leave me a message. If you rather discuss things in private you can e-mail me. --Aucaman 12:21, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
| Server time (UTC) 03:54 Wednesday 22-January-2025 |
 Archives |
|---|
Persian people, Persian Jews, etc.
Racists abound on Misplaced Pages, much to my chagrin, as do quacks and all manner of other proponents of wanton stupidity. If that statement ever prevents me from becoming a bureaucrat, I'll count it as further undeniable proof thereof. People pontificate and pontificate, and usually those who know what they're talking about give up in disgust long before those who clearly haven't the foggiest notion whereof they speak, do so. This can clearly be seen in what is currently going on in the endless moronic discussion on Talk:Persian Jews where idiots are arguing, with seemingly boundless energy, unfettered by rational thought or the faintest clue what they're talking about, that "Persian Jews" means "Jews who presently live in Iran". I'll look into your request and try to weigh in with a few words of intelligent thought, but I offer no guarantee that they'll be received at all Cheerfully, but disgustedly, in as good of spirits as that can leave either of us, yours, Tomer 07:10, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
Talk page messaging
Hi, it was brought to my attention that you had posted the same message to a large number of user pages regarding the POV dispute on Persian people. I will try and explain how these sorts of disputes are usually resolved so that you can better understand the processes we have in place. First the talk page on the individual article is the first place you should go if you have a dispute about something that pertains to that article specifically, as this does. This may sometimes seem slow, as you will very often have to wait a number of days for a full response. This is normal, and you shouldn't escalate the situation just because no one responds in a few hours for example.
If you are dealing with an article that gets little or no attention, or you are in an argument that you think needs a few more voices use Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment. This is a centralized place for people to see situations that might need further input. The point of both of these processes is to have the information on the page in which it is most relevant. While it might seem like a fast solution to leave a message on 50 people's talk page, it's not looked upon well by the community because it decentralizes the discussion to which everyone might want to be a contributor. For example what if 30 of those people start having conversations with you on their talk page, that quickly becomes unmanageable. I hope I have explained the reasoning behind how these things are usually done. I'm going to go ahead and revert the messages, you should probably list your arguments on Talk:Persian people if you haven't already. If you want to read more about it have a look at the spamming page. If you have any other questions let me know. - cohesion 08:33, 2 May 2006 (UTC)