| Revision as of 14:37, 11 September 2012 editDucatidave5 (talk | contribs)12 edits →September 2012← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:38, 11 September 2012 edit undoSkepticalRaptor (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,146 edits Warning: Violating the three-revert rule on MMR vaccine controversy. (TW)Next edit → | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| == September 2012 == | == September 2012 == | ||
| ] Skeptical Raptor, by promoting pro-vaccine propaganda by reverting accurate, balanced, and legit edits to this page, you hamper Misplaced Pages for everyone. I have not the time, patience, nor energy to continue ammeding what I now consider, because of people like you, a worthless vaccine refference source. | ] Skeptical Raptor, by promoting pro-vaccine propaganda by reverting accurate, balanced, and legit edits to this page, you hamper Misplaced Pages for everyone. I have not the time, patience, nor energy to continue ammeding what I now consider, because of people like you, a worthless vaccine refference source. | ||
| ] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. '''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. | |||
| To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. See ] for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 14:38, 11 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:38, 11 September 2012
September 2012
Please do not add your own research based on facts to Misplaced Pages articles, as you did to MMR vaccine controversy. Doing so breaches my version of formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. SkepticalRaptor (talk) 18:37, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Misplaced Pages, as you did at MMR vaccine controversy, you may be blocked from editing. Continued edit warring over the same thing borders on vandalism. Stop. SkepticalRaptor (talk) 21:47, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you violate Misplaced Pages's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at MMR vaccine controversy, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. SkepticalRaptor (talk) 14:34, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
September 2012
Skeptical Raptor, by promoting pro-vaccine propaganda by reverting accurate, balanced, and legit edits to this page, you hamper Misplaced Pages for everyone. I have not the time, patience, nor energy to continue ammeding what I now consider, because of people like you, a worthless vaccine refference source.
Your recent editing history at MMR vaccine controversy shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. SkepticalRaptor (talk) 14:38, 11 September 2012 (UTC)