Misplaced Pages

Talk:Abraham Lincoln: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 05:23, 17 November 2012 editPiotrus (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Event coordinators, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers286,432 edits Suggestion: reducing clutter through list-defined references: new section← Previous edit Revision as of 06:18, 17 November 2012 edit undo (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users72,314 edits Suggestion: reducing clutter through list-defined referencesNext edit →
Line 131: Line 131:


Regarding . Per ]: "Inline references can significantly bloat the wikitext in the edit window and can be extremely difficult and confusing. There are three methods that avoid clutter in the edit window: ], short citations or parenthetical references. (As with other citation formats, articles should not undergo large scale conversion between formats without consensus to do so.)" I'd like to introduce list-defined references to this article, to make it more friendly to edit (less code -> closer to WYSWIWYG). Per the request of editor who reverted me and ] recommendation I'd like to ask editors interested in this article for input which style they prefer, and strongly suggest following the "avoid clutter" recommendation. While LDR add a little code to the total size of the article, it amounts to only 10% or so of the total article size, so load time should not be significantly affected (nobody should notice a 10% change; also, section edit load time will shorter anyway...), and editing experience should become much friendlier. --<sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]&#124;]</sub> 05:23, 17 November 2012 (UTC) Regarding . Per ]: "Inline references can significantly bloat the wikitext in the edit window and can be extremely difficult and confusing. There are three methods that avoid clutter in the edit window: ], short citations or parenthetical references. (As with other citation formats, articles should not undergo large scale conversion between formats without consensus to do so.)" I'd like to introduce list-defined references to this article, to make it more friendly to edit (less code -> closer to WYSWIWYG). Per the request of editor who reverted me and ] recommendation I'd like to ask editors interested in this article for input which style they prefer, and strongly suggest following the "avoid clutter" recommendation. While LDR add a little code to the total size of the article, it amounts to only 10% or so of the total article size, so load time should not be significantly affected (nobody should notice a 10% change; also, section edit load time will shorter anyway...), and editing experience should become much friendlier. --<sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]&#124;]</sub> 05:23, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
:Yes, I completely agree. I did that with the ] and ] articles and it works well. It also really helps when you want to find the refs again to edit them as you know right where to look, instead of having to search through a sea of text.--<i>ɱ </i> 06:18, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 06:18, 17 November 2012

Skip to table of contents
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Abraham Lincoln article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: Index, Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30Auto-archiving period: 30 days 

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Abraham Lincoln article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: Index, Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30Auto-archiving period: 30 days 
Former featured articleAbraham Lincoln is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Good articleAbraham Lincoln has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
[REDACTED] This article appeared on Misplaced Pages's Main Page as Today's featured article on May 5, 2004.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 16, 2004Featured article candidatePromoted
October 8, 2006Featured article reviewDemoted
December 24, 2006Good article nomineeNot listed
March 18, 2007Good article nomineeNot listed
February 22, 2008Good article nomineeNot listed
September 23, 2009Good article nomineeNot listed
September 16, 2010Featured article candidateNot promoted
December 16, 2010Good article nomineeListed
March 16, 2011Peer reviewReviewed
May 1, 2011Featured article candidateNot promoted
Current status: Former featured article, current good article

Template:Controversial (history)

This page is not a forum for general discussion about Abraham Lincoln. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Abraham Lincoln at the Reference desk.
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconBiography: Politics and Government / Core
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Top-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is listed on the project's core biographies page.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconIllinois Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconMilitary history: Biography / North America / United States / American Civil War
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
Associated task forces:
Taskforce icon
Military biography task force
Taskforce icon
North American military history task force
Taskforce icon
United States military history task force
Taskforce icon
American Civil War task force

Template:WP1.0

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconPolitics Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconUnited States: Presidents / State Legislatures / Government Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject United States Presidents (assessed as Top-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. State Legislatures (assessed as Low-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Low-importance).
A fact from this article was featured on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the On this day section on March 4, 2004, April 14, 2004, April 14, 2005, and February 12, 2009.
Toolbox

Animal Rights

Why is there no mention of Lincoln's stance on Animal Rights? He was considered a major advocate of animal rights for his time.--Valkyrie Red (talk)

True. Lincoln was personally kind to animals including his Tabby cat at the White House. However PETA (founded 1980) did not exist then. Unless there is a specific Lincoln speech on Animal rights I am not sure there is enough historical weight to put in the article. Did Lincoln sign any laws that protected any hunted animals? I am not sure he did. Cmguy777 (talk) 04:29, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
I agree with Cmguy777 note that Abe never went hunting or fishing; did he ever have a pet of his own (as opposed to one for the kids)??--no one seems to mention it, although publishers joke that they are eager for that book on Lincoln's dog. Rjensen (talk) 07:45, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Myths

This article could definitely use a section on the myths and legends associated with Lincoln, and then it should say whether or not it is true or false. This would be both interesting and informative, and it would clear up things for people. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.102.168.15 (talk) 23:05, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

Product of his time?

Does anybody have access to a reference by a historian making note of Lincoln possibly being a product of his time regarding his ethnic slurs, etcetera? I think it would be worth putting and could round out that section (I can't remember the name; something about historical reputation). I was actually surprised it wasn't there. I'm not trying to excuse his actions, but it's almost a no-brainer to me. Has anybody heard of Ben Franklin? Just a thought. Lighthead 07:49, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

I just want to add that my previous comment is sort of misleading. I mean to ask if anyone has any miscellaneous reference; not one in particular. It almost sounds as if I'm asking about one that I remember seeing. Not so. Thanks. Lighthead 08:33, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

Possible Addition

I saw that the Duel article had a mention of Lincoln with a 'citation needed' tag at the end, so I found that the James Shields article has a good bit about it, something that I believe should be copied into this article. That is allowed under WP:CWW, as long as the editor mentions the article copied from and the date copied. Here is the text, and it has two references within:

Shields nearly fought a duel with Abraham Lincoln on September 22, 1842. Lincoln had published an inflammatory letter in a Springfield, Illinois, newspaper, the Sagamon Journal that poked fun at Shields, the State Auditor. Lincoln's future wife and her close friend, continued writing letters about Shields without his knowledge. Taking offense to the articles, Shields demanded "satisfaction" and the incident escalated to the two parties meeting on a Missouri island called Sunflower Island, near Alton, Illinois to participate in a duel. Lincoln took responsibility for the articles and accepted the duel. Just prior to engaging in combat, Lincoln made it a point to demonstrate his advantage by easily cutting a branch just above Shields' head, the two participants' seconds intervened and were able to convince the two men to cease hostilities, on the grounds that Lincoln had not written the letters.

  1. "Abraham Lincoln Prepares to Fight a Saber Duel", originally published by Civil War Times magazine
  2. Carnegie, Dale (1982). How to Win Friends & Influence People. New York, NY: POCKET BOOKS. p. 9. ISBN 0-671-72365-0.

Thanks. I hope someone finds this interesting enough for inclusion.--ɱ 03:43, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

Legacy

There should be a section in this article titled "Legacy", as there is with George Washington and likely many other U.S. presidents.--Solomonfromfinland (talk) 04:13, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

Suggestion: reducing clutter through list-defined references

Regarding . Per Misplaced Pages:Citing_sources#Avoiding_clutter: "Inline references can significantly bloat the wikitext in the edit window and can be extremely difficult and confusing. There are three methods that avoid clutter in the edit window: list-defined references, short citations or parenthetical references. (As with other citation formats, articles should not undergo large scale conversion between formats without consensus to do so.)" I'd like to introduce list-defined references to this article, to make it more friendly to edit (less code -> closer to WYSWIWYG). Per the request of editor who reverted me and WP:CITEVAR recommendation I'd like to ask editors interested in this article for input which style they prefer, and strongly suggest following the "avoid clutter" recommendation. While LDR add a little code to the total size of the article, it amounts to only 10% or so of the total article size, so load time should not be significantly affected (nobody should notice a 10% change; also, section edit load time will shorter anyway...), and editing experience should become much friendlier. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:23, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

Yes, I completely agree. I did that with the BrickFair and Lego The Lord of the Rings articles and it works well. It also really helps when you want to find the refs again to edit them as you know right where to look, instead of having to search through a sea of text.--ɱ 06:18, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
Categories:
Talk:Abraham Lincoln: Difference between revisions Add topic