Misplaced Pages

User talk:159.1.15.34: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 07:23, 22 November 2012 editSmsarmad (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers38,409 editsm Talkback (User talk:Smsarmad#Re: Drone attacks in Pakistan) (TW)← Previous edit Revision as of 03:02, 23 November 2012 edit undoEdJohnston (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators71,242 edits Result of a complaint about your edits at WP:Arbitration enforcement: new sectionNext edit →
Line 30: Line 30:
{{talkback|Smsarmad|Re: Drone attacks in Pakistan|ts=07:23, 22 November 2012 (UTC)}} {{talkback|Smsarmad|Re: Drone attacks in Pakistan|ts=07:23, 22 November 2012 (UTC)}}
] <sup>]</sup> 07:23, 22 November 2012 (UTC) ] <sup>]</sup> 07:23, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

== Result of a complaint about your edits at ] ==

Please see . The complaint is being closed with no block but you are now officially notified of the discretionary sanctions under ].

{{Ivmbox
| image = yes
| The ] has permitted ] to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at ]) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to the ]. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the ], satisfy any ], or follow any ]. If you continue to misconduct yourself on pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the "]" section of the decision page.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at ], with the appropriate sections of ], and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This notice is given by an uninvolved administrator and&nbsp;will be logged on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system.<!-- Template:uw-sanctions - {{{topic|{{{t}}}}}} -->
| valign = center
| ]
}} Let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, ] (]) 03:02, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:02, 23 November 2012

Where did you post the text from the Haaretz article? I can't see it. Cheers, --Dailycare (talk) 20:50, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for your response. Since you're the editor proposing to change the article, the burden of proof is on you to provide the text, so we can see whether the material is missing. You can post the relevant snippet to the talkpage, for example, so we can see what the source says. Until then, the original version of the article (with this material in) stays up. I believe you accidentally made two reverts within a 24-hour period in this article, which is forbidden, try to avoid doing that in the future. Cheers, --Dailycare (talk) 21:33, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
Hi, that article is under 1RR, not 3RR do you did make a mistake, however don't worry I'm not going to report you for that, unless it becomes a custom. Concerning the source, you said in your edit summary that the 8% figure isn't there. This means you have access to the source, unlike most editors. Therefore, please provide it so we can verify if the text is there. --Dailycare (talk) 22:01, 19 November 2012 (UTC)


Hi, I've filed an arbitration enforcement request concerning you here. You can provide your comments if you like. --Dailycare (talk) 20:52, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

Welcome to Misplaced Pages!

Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:

You are welcome to continue editing without logging in, but many editors recommend that you create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (159.1.15.34) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. Again, welcome! Shrike (talk)/WP:RX 21:57, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

November 2012

Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Drone attacks in Pakistan. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Misplaced Pages this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Misplaced Pages is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. SMS 21:07, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Talkback

Hello, 159.1.15.34. You have new messages at Smsarmad's talk page.
Message added 07:23, 22 November 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

SMS 07:23, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

Result of a complaint about your edits at WP:Arbitration enforcement

Please see this result. The complaint is being closed with no block but you are now officially notified of the discretionary sanctions under WP:ARBPIA.

File:Yes
The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to the Arab-Israeli conflict. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, satisfy any standard of behavior, or follow any normal editorial process. If you continue to misconduct yourself on pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the "Final decision" section of the decision page.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions, with the appropriate sections of Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee/Procedures, and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This notice is given by an uninvolved administrator and will be logged on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system.

Let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 03:02, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

User talk:159.1.15.34: Difference between revisions Add topic