| Revision as of 22:50, 26 November 2012 editAlohamesamis (talk | contribs)140 edits Shoo!← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:57, 26 November 2012 edit undoViriditas (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers170,051 edits add noticeNext edit → | ||
| Line 113: | Line 113: | ||
| ==Glühwein== | ==Glühwein== | ||
| Aloha, bub. The simple accident that "gløgg", glögg", et al have been translated into "]" for the English WP project doesn't mean that non-alcoholic varieties should be excluded. Merry Christmas/Yule, <span style="background:#007FFF;font-family:Times New Roman;">]]</span> 07:40, 25 November 2012 (UTC) | Aloha, bub. The simple accident that "gløgg", glögg", et al have been translated into "]" for the English WP project doesn't mean that non-alcoholic varieties should be excluded. Merry Christmas/Yule, <span style="background:#007FFF;font-family:Times New Roman;">]]</span> 07:40, 25 November 2012 (UTC) | ||
| ==Sandwich wrap== | |||
| ] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]  according to the reverts you have made on ]. Users are expected to ] with others, to avoid editing ], and to ] rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.<br> | |||
| Please be particularly aware, ] states: | |||
| # '''Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made'''; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts. | |||
| # '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.''' | |||
| If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's ] to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents ] among editors. You can post a request for help at an ] or seek ]. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary ]. If you engage in an edit war, you '''may be ] from editing.'''<!-- Template:uw-ew --> ] (]) 22:23, 26 November 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ==Nutella== | |||
| ] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. | |||
| To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. See ] for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 22:40, 26 November 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ==ANI notice== | |||
| Hello. There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you. ] (]) 22:57, 26 November 2012 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:57, 26 November 2012
Welcome
|
October 2012
Your recent editing history at Francis Bacon (artist) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Bbb23 (talk) 16:39, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
- You're a very new account. Two editors have reverted you; yet you persist. Adding many, many refs (in the wrong way, btw) doesn't necessarily resolve the issue. Discuss the content on the talk page, or you risk being blocked.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:42, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
Alohamesamis, you are invited to the Teahouse
| [REDACTED] |
Hi Alohamesamis! Thanks for contributing to Misplaced Pages. Please join other people who edit Misplaced Pages at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Misplaced Pages where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Misplaced Pages and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Writ Keeper (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the TeahouseThis message was delivered automatically by your friendly neighborhood HostBot (talk) 01:22, 30 October 2012 (UTC) |
November 2012
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. 5 albert square (talk) 21:53, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
Alohamesamis (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I was attacked ] by User:Jon C.. Why should I be blocked for defending myself, while he is allowed to continue attacking fellow editors ? Alohamesamis (talk) 22:15, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
Decline reason:
If you can't tell the difference between "get bent" and "you cunt", you're not going to last long around here. --jpgordon 22:54, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Alohamesamis (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
If I can be attacked, there is no reason why I should not be allowed to reciprocate "Please don't tell me to "get bent". There is such a thing as civility, you cunt." is no more offensive than "get bent".Alohamesamis (talk) 23:00, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
Decline reason:
When I read the comment to you to "get bent", the way I read it is that the editor was telling you to go away, it wasn't a personal attack of any sort. However the way you responded is and it was wrong as well. I suggest that you use the time out to read Misplaced Pages:No personal attacks which shows you how to handle such situations. 5 albert square (talk) 23:44, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
According to WP:WIAPA, "Insulting or disparaging an editor is a personal attack regardless of the manner in which it is done". "Get bent" is, and was clearly intended to be, disparaging. If one person were to say that to another on the street, it would doubtless be taken as insulting. I should not be punished for speaking to another editor as he spoke to me. This is exactly why[REDACTED] is losing editors. Alohamesamis (talk) 00:33, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
- A little birdy asked me, an old raven, to drop by here for the sake of linguistics and human behavior. All I can say is "duh", since this is an open and shut case. You were blocked for all the right reasons, and your unblock requests were denied for similar reasons. Sorry. Your history suggests you are editing here as if this is your neighborhood bar, and that's not OK, and retaliation, as anyone who watches sports in their neighborhood bar, is what the referee always catches. "She hit me first" is no apology for hitting back. Drmies (talk) 00:26, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
- "Your history suggests you are editing here as if this is your neighborhood bar". In English, please? " "She hit me first" is no apology for hitting back. " I wasn't apologising. Alohamesamis (talk) 16:05, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
Removing warning notices
I would only mention that when you are warned by other editors, removing the notice (and doing so with disparaging edit summaries) is not only not collegial, but is openly hostile. And it doesn't make the warning go away. It also suggests a closed mind and position, and a lack of openness to change or constructive criticism. Remonstrating on the users talk pages only aggravates a bad situation. I write this not to disparage you, but to counsel a different course in the future. I don't want to lose constructive editors, but bar room brawlers we can do without. I hope your editing goes well in the future. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 00:46, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
- Actually, as per WP:REMOVED you can remove stuff from your talk page. The only things that shouldn't be removed are things like the unblock requests (whilst the user is still blocked), arb-com stuff, deletion tags etc. Users can remove warnings from their pages, that's often taken as them having read the warning, however Misplaced Pages do prefer talk pages to be archived instead.--5 albert square (talk) 01:31, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
Glühwein
Aloha, bub. The simple accident that "gløgg", glögg", et al have been translated into "mulled wine" for the English WP project doesn't mean that non-alcoholic varieties should be excluded. Merry Christmas/Yule, Mr.choppers | ✎ 07:40, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
Sandwich wrap
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Sandwich wrap. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware, Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring states:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Viriditas (talk) 22:23, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
Nutella
Your recent editing history at Nutella shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Viriditas (talk) 22:40, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
ANI notice
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Viriditas (talk) 22:57, 26 November 2012 (UTC)