Revision as of 06:31, 3 January 2013 editRothbardanswer (talk | contribs)389 edits →Dont get blocked for site spam of http://library.mises.org← Previous edit | Revision as of 06:46, 3 January 2013 edit undoNick-D (talk | contribs)Administrators106,249 edits →Dont get blocked for site spam of http://library.mises.org: cmtNext edit → | ||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 54: | Line 54: | ||
Thanks for the help Moxy. I just always have that source in the back of my mind because it's an easy to access online archive. But I think pretty much everything they've ever published is a reprint. I'll make sure to find different sources though :) | Thanks for the help Moxy. I just always have that source in the back of my mind because it's an easy to access online archive. But I think pretty much everything they've ever published is a reprint. I'll make sure to find different sources though :) | ||
] (]) 06:31, 3 January 2013 (UTC) | ] (]) 06:31, 3 January 2013 (UTC) | ||
:Please start a discussion about why you think these books should be linked from the ] article rather than edit war. ] (]) 06:40, 3 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
::Oh, I see that you've posted a comment at the end of the unrelated 'The Soviet Union1939-1941' section. I'll move your comment to a new section and reply. ] (]) 06:46, 3 January 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 06:46, 3 January 2013
WelcomeHello and welcome to Misplaced Pages! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent edits do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Misplaced Pages's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the "sandbox" rather than in articles.
If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Misplaced Pages.
I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! SwisterTwister talk 01:25, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
Rothbard
While I agree with your edit here please note that it is wrongly marked as minor. Such an edit might be disputed, so it is not minor. Only mark trivial edits as minor, such as typos, ext. All the best and Gmar Hatima Tuva, if you happen to be Jewish, as Rothbard was. --MeUser42 (talk) 15:17, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
- Please take a look at the edit & my reason for reversion. The sentence deals with Rothbard's influence on American style liberalism, not from where he was influenced. Moreover, what does the supporting reference say? That is the critical editing question. --S. Rich (talk) 15:46, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
- I tried to reformulate to make the intention clearer. --MeUser42 (talk) 16:18, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nazi book burnings, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Libertarian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
Your recent edits on political philosophy articles
Thanks for helping to improve the articles on Libertarianism and Georgism! I have noticed, however, that you seem to be unfamiliar with the Misplaced Pages policies on editorializing and lead construction. In order to provide a neutral point-of-view, we refrain from using words like thoroughly and debunked in our articles. Also, leads should summarize the article instead of presenting tangential or contradictory information. If there is information not present in a particular article, please add this material to the body (with reliable sources for verifiability); the lead can be altered afterward to appropriately reflect these changes. Thank you again for your input! -- MisterDub (talk | contribs) 21:35, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
Recent edits on 'market anarchism'
Please do not make edits based on unsupported claims, on issues already discussed and settled on the talk page in Market Anarchism. If you believe that the conclusions are wrong, some evidence to the contrary and discussion would be much appreciated. This is, once again, resembling vandalism and I have reverted your changes. For the third time now, please see the talk page instead starting an edit war. Finx (talk) 21:51, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
The clarification for my edit is explained here.
The QUALITY of a good or service being predicted by supply and demand means that if someone is selling a product (Such as chicken sandwiches or a toy) it is pivotal that the product should meet the consumer's demand of exceptional quality to establish an appropriate rapport between the seller and buyer. If there is a failure in establishing excellent quality for a product, then according to Adam Smith's concept of the invisible hand, nobody will want to buy the product, therefore the self regulating features of the free market will either compel the seller to adjust the quality of a good in the context of excellent value to increase consumption and profit, or consequently, he will lose his business. If you still aren't convinced of my explanation, maybe we can add our notions to the talk page. Thanks for your time. Signing off. Nashhinton (talk) 07:45, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
My point was a technical issue of economic science. I think I understand what you're saying about entrepreneurs marketing things but that doesn't go into the lead of what a market is. A markets supply and demand is determined by price. A price is a psychic value ratio that coordinates exchange, wage rates, interest rates etc. Quality is subjective but it's consumed within the definition of a price. Quality of goods is SPECIFIED pricing. It itself doesn't determine economic laws or anything. If you've got questions or disagreements please message me back :) Rothbardanswer (talk) 03:17, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Marxism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gary North (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:48, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
The See also section
Hello, you made several edits where you added external links to the see also section of pages. Please only place internal links in this section per WP:See also, and please make sure any links you add to the External links section adhere to WP:EL. Thanks. --JFHutson (talk) 04:29, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Misplaced Pages pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 05:39, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
Dont get blocked for site spam of http://library.mises.org
- pls read over WP:PROMO - you here to help Misplaced Pages or library.mises.org?
Sometimes Misplaced Pages sees bookspam, which is the insertion of text mentioning books to call attention to the books, publisher or book-hosting site, rather than to contribute to the article. This often takes the form of inserting book listings into reference sections although the book is not used as the source of any information in the article. Bookspam is also seen as the addition of books to "external links", "further reading" or similar sections, although the books added do not add any useful and relevant information.Moxy (talk) 05:57, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for the help Moxy. I just always have that source in the back of my mind because it's an easy to access online archive. But I think pretty much everything they've ever published is a reprint. I'll make sure to find different sources though :) Rothbardanswer (talk) 06:31, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
- Please start a discussion about why you think these books should be linked from the World War II article rather than edit war. Nick-D (talk) 06:40, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
- Oh, I see that you've posted a comment at the end of the unrelated 'The Soviet Union1939-1941' section. I'll move your comment to a new section and reply. Nick-D (talk) 06:46, 3 January 2013 (UTC)