| Revision as of 16:39, 3 January 2013 editSaddhiyama (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers23,958 edits Final Warning: Adding original research, including unpublished syntheses of sourced material on Flashback Media Group. (TW)← Previous edit | Revision as of 09:08, 4 January 2013 edit undoSaddhiyama (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers23,958 edits expand 3rr warningNext edit → | ||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
| ] This is your '''last warning'''. The next time you violate Misplaced Pages's ] by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at ], you may be '''] without further notice'''. <!-- Template:uw-nor4 --> ] (]) 16:39, 3 January 2013 (UTC) | ] This is your '''last warning'''. The next time you violate Misplaced Pages's ] by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at ], you may be '''] without further notice'''. <!-- Template:uw-nor4 --> ] (]) 16:39, 3 January 2013 (UTC) | ||
| :''If this is a ], and you didn't make the edit, consider ] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''<!-- Template:Shared IP advice --> | :''If this is a ], and you didn't make the edit, consider ] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''<!-- Template:Shared IP advice --> | ||
| ] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. '''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. | |||
| To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. See ] for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 09:02, 4 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :''If this is a ], and you didn't make the edit, consider ] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''<!-- Template:Shared IP advice --> | |||
| Please refrain from trying to insert the information in that article by ], or you will find yourself blocked from violating ]. You will need to engage in a discussion on the talk page to gain ] regarding your edit. --] (]) 09:08, 4 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 09:08, 4 January 2013
Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Misplaced Pages pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button 
or 
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 20:06, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
January 2013
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Nymf talk to me 14:31, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
This is your last warning. The next time you violate Misplaced Pages's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Nymf talk to me 14:32, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Citing flashbacks own archive is not inserting unpublished information. This is a false accusation. Notably, you also delete a lot at the Swedish racist Sweden Democrat page, a website intimately connected to flashback. Your political bias in obfuscating truthful facts is clear and I am reporting it.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.195.55.193 (talk • contribs)
- Everything needs to be sourced using reliable, secondary sources. Drawing your own conclusion from a link is the very definition of original synthesis. Feel free to report me. Looking at your edit history and comments, it seems that the only one of us that is politically biased, is you. Nymf talk to me 14:54, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you violate Misplaced Pages's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Flashback Media Group, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Saddhiyama (talk) 16:39, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Your recent editing history at Flashback Media Group shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Saddhiyama (talk) 09:02, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Please refrain from trying to insert the information in that article by edit warring, or you will find yourself blocked from violating WP:3RR. You will need to engage in a discussion on the talk page to gain consensus regarding your edit. --Saddhiyama (talk) 09:08, 4 January 2013 (UTC)