| Revision as of 03:06, 8 February 2013 editKs0stm (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators25,728 edits creating case | Revision as of 13:36, 6 March 2013 edit undoJames Cantor (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers6,721 edits →Alarming comments from "Anon": new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{Casenav}} | {{Casenav}} | ||
| == Alarming comments from "Anon" == | |||
| The IP editor has made some rather disturbing claims. | |||
| 1. For the record, I have absolutely nothing to do with any case of anyone blackmailing anyone. | |||
| 2. The IP user shows several indications of being ]: | |||
| :*The editor's concern appears to be KimvdLinde's withdrawal from the case (and my just mentioning it on the evidence page). | |||
| :*Geolocate indicates that the IP address is in this exactly the same part of Florida as KimvdLinde: cf. http://whatismyipaddress.com/ip/69.244.220.253 and http://www.neuro.fsu.edu/postdoc/linde/ . | |||
| :*The IP editor has previously edited on ], essentially the only topic which KimvdLinde edits (other than when following Cantor) | |||
| 3. Although I do not want to distract from the main event, I believe the IP editor should be checked as being Kim's sock puppet. | |||
| What to do if that turns out to be the case is probably best decided by others, but that above is not at all appropriate for someone with WP admin privileges. | |||
| ] (]) 13:36, 6 March 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 13:36, 6 March 2013
Main case page (Talk) — Evidence (Talk) — Workshop (Talk) — Proposed decision (Talk)Case clerk: TBD Drafting arbitrator: TBD
| Misplaced Pages Arbitration |
|---|
 |
| Open proceedings |
| Active sanctions |
| Arbitration Committee |
Audit
|
| Track related changes |
Behaviour on this page: Arbitration case pages exist to assist the Arbitration Committee in arriving at a fair, well-informed decision. You are required to act with appropriate decorum during this case. While grievances must often be aired during a case, you are expected to air them without being rude or hostile, and to respond calmly to allegations against you. Accusations of misbehaviour posted in this case must be proven with clear evidence (and otherwise not made at all). Editors who conduct themselves inappropriately during a case may be sanctioned by an arbitrator or clerk, without further warning, by being banned from further participation in the case, or being blocked altogether. Personal attacks against other users, including arbitrators or clerks, will be met with sanctions. Behaviour during a case may also be considered by the committee in arriving at a final decision.
Alarming comments from "Anon"
The IP editor has made some rather disturbing claims.
1. For the record, I have absolutely nothing to do with any case of anyone blackmailing anyone.
2. The IP user shows several indications of being User:KimvdLinde:
- The editor's concern appears to be KimvdLinde's withdrawal from the case (and my just mentioning it on the evidence page).
- Geolocate indicates that the IP address is in this exactly the same part of Florida as KimvdLinde: cf. http://whatismyipaddress.com/ip/69.244.220.253 and http://www.neuro.fsu.edu/postdoc/linde/ .
- The IP editor has previously edited on parrots, essentially the only topic which KimvdLinde edits (other than when following Cantor)
3. Although I do not want to distract from the main event, I believe the IP editor should be checked as being Kim's sock puppet.
What to do if that turns out to be the case is probably best decided by others, but that above is not at all appropriate for someone with WP admin privileges.