Revision as of 14:56, 26 September 2012 editPhilip Cross (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers211,472 edits →Oliver Kamm: new section← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 05:39, 7 March 2013 edit undoPhilip Cross (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers211,472 edits WP:AGF | ||
(117 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Here for any inquires.''' | '''Here for any inquires.''' | ||
== |
==Harassment== | ||
If you are being harassed by another editor, which you are, and they have been warned, please avoid making it worse by responding by repeatedly communicating with them, challenging their edits, or whatever. Focus on making contributions to our project. ] ] 11:48, 28 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
⚫ | : I am going to take your advice from now on. Cheers.] (]) 12:30, 28 September 2012 (UTC) | ||
== October 2012 == | |||
Your edits to Vietnam war casualties are not formatted correctly, but the citations to Rummel are too screwed up for me to bother with.] (]) 22:55, 24 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''1 month''' for ]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may ] by adding below this notice the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}, but you should read the ] first.<p>During a dispute, you should first try to ] and seek ]. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek ], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request ]. ] (]) 22:30, 9 October 2012 (UTC)</p></div><!-- Template:uw-ewblock --> | |||
:The links on some of the numbers there were incorrect so I changed them earlier on and then you came and changed them back to the wrong link. I am sorting out the links in the reference/notes page now,well the ones I did earlier.There are so many numbers on that page that it is confusing and I am sure they add up differently for different sections.] (]) 22:58, 24 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
: Very fair yet again. I am starting to like you as a moderator/admin. ] (]) 22:31, 9 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
::See, comments like this... they give me a bad feeling that I've been suckered somehow. Later tonight I'll look and see if I've missed something, and should lift TTAAC's block. --] (]) 22:35, 9 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
:::Really? I was actually being honest but s your brought up TTAAC he has been edit waring as well.] (]) 22:45, 9 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
<div class="notice" style="background:#ffe0e0; border:1px solid #886644; padding:0.5em; margin:0.5em auto; min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' temporarily from editing for ]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. Your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the ], then contact administrators by submitting a request to the '']''. ] (]) 23:02, 9 October 2012 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-blocknotalk --> | |||
== Cambodia == | |||
I won't revert, because I don't really care, but the phrase about the "fall of Cambodia's communist regime" is technically accurate in the sense that the "People's Republic of Kampuchea" has ceased to exist.] (]) 14:23, 26 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
⚫ | : |
||
::Whatever. Be careful about applying comparable ] to articles, as you did .] (]) 14:44, 26 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
== Oliver Kamm == | |||
Having ceased editing the article on OK for some reason, and beginning with ], you now appear to be airbrushing Kamm out of WP in the manner of those photos from which Trotsky vanished. Squirrel, why would you be doing that? ] (]) 14:56, 26 September 2012 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 05:39, 7 March 2013
Here for any inquires.
Harassment
If you are being harassed by another editor, which you are, and they have been warned, please avoid making it worse by responding by repeatedly communicating with them, challenging their edits, or whatever. Focus on making contributions to our project. User:Fred Bauder Talk 11:48, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
- I am going to take your advice from now on. Cheers.Zrdragon12 (talk) 12:30, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
October 2012
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Floquenbeam (talk) 22:30, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
- Very fair yet again. I am starting to like you as a moderator/admin. Zrdragon12 (talk) 22:31, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
- See, comments like this... they give me a bad feeling that I've been suckered somehow. Later tonight I'll look and see if I've missed something, and should lift TTAAC's block. --Floquenbeam (talk) 22:35, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
- Really? I was actually being honest but s your brought up TTAAC he has been edit waring as well.Zrdragon12 (talk) 22:45, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
- See, comments like this... they give me a bad feeling that I've been suckered somehow. Later tonight I'll look and see if I've missed something, and should lift TTAAC's block. --Floquenbeam (talk) 22:35, 9 October 2012 (UTC)