| Revision as of 22:45, 9 October 2012 editZrdragon12 (talk | contribs)824 edits new section on Nguyen1310← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 05:39, 7 March 2013 edit undoPhilip Cross (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers211,472 edits WP:AGF | ||
| (14 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| :::Really? I was actually being honest but s your brought up TTAAC he has been edit waring as well.] (]) 22:45, 9 October 2012 (UTC) | :::Really? I was actually being honest but s your brought up TTAAC he has been edit waring as well.] (]) 22:45, 9 October 2012 (UTC) | ||
| <div class="notice" style="background:#ffe0e0; border:1px solid #886644; padding:0.5em; margin:0.5em auto; min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' temporarily from editing for ]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. Your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the ], then contact administrators by submitting a request to the '']''. ] (]) 23:02, 9 October 2012 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-blocknotalk --> | |||
| ==Nguyen1310== | |||
| If you are going to go to ] talk page and rant about me deleting your unsourced material then at least be honest and link to the whole section of edits and not just the last one while cutting out the other 4 so as to claim dishonestly that I just deleted your stuff.. It is perfectly clear why your piece and sources were deleted as I explained on the talk page section I started. Your first source was from examiner.com and when I added the reflist because you forgot to put one in so your sources did not show up,wikipedia stated that it was blacklisted so I removed it. Your 3 other sources are backpacker reviews from lonely planet forum,trip advisor reviews and a piece on about.com written by a back packer,they are not reputable sources. Therefore your piece was unsourced and I removed it. You have now reverted two editors who have removed your piece and you are edit waring yet again.] (]) 22:45, 9 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 05:39, 7 March 2013
Here for any inquires.
Harassment
If you are being harassed by another editor, which you are, and they have been warned, please avoid making it worse by responding by repeatedly communicating with them, challenging their edits, or whatever. Focus on making contributions to our project. User:Fred Bauder Talk 11:48, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
- I am going to take your advice from now on. Cheers.Zrdragon12 (talk) 12:30, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
October 2012
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Floquenbeam (talk) 22:30, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
- Very fair yet again. I am starting to like you as a moderator/admin. Zrdragon12 (talk) 22:31, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
- See, comments like this... they give me a bad feeling that I've been suckered somehow. Later tonight I'll look and see if I've missed something, and should lift TTAAC's block. --Floquenbeam (talk) 22:35, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
- Really? I was actually being honest but s your brought up TTAAC he has been edit waring as well.Zrdragon12 (talk) 22:45, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
- See, comments like this... they give me a bad feeling that I've been suckered somehow. Later tonight I'll look and see if I've missed something, and should lift TTAAC's block. --Floquenbeam (talk) 22:35, 9 October 2012 (UTC)