| Revision as of 10:16, 11 March 2013 editSonicyouth86 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers7,527 edits →Slow edit warring: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:37, 11 March 2013 edit undoCSDarrow (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,671 edits →Slow edit warringNext edit → | ||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
| I see that you were informed that ] is on article probation. Please consider this a reminder. --] (]) 10:16, 11 March 2013 (UTC) | I see that you were informed that ] is on article probation. Please consider this a reminder. --] (]) 10:16, 11 March 2013 (UTC) | ||
| Don't come into my talk page you ignorant peasant and lecture me on the do's and don't of Misplaced Pages. You actions on the Mens Rights site appalling and is compromising the whole Misplaced Pages concept. ] (]) 13:37, 11 March 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 13:37, 11 March 2013
Note
Just a note to remove the red link from you talk page. You have taken a name that places the bar pretty high and I am hoping that you live up to it. Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 15:45, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
A friendly notice
Thank you for your contributions to the encyclopedia! In case you are not already aware, an article to which you have recently contributed, Men's rights movement, is on article probation. A detailed description of the terms of article probation may be found at Talk:Men's rights movement/Article probation. Also note that the terms of some article probations extend to related articles and their associated talk pages.
The above is a templated message. Please accept it as a routine friendly notice, not as a claim that there is any problem with your edits. Thank you. Cailil 00:44, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
Men's Rights Dispute
"Men's Rights Resolution Dispute"
Just making sure
...that I was right to do this. Cheers, Reyk YO! 06:33, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
Yes that is fine. I am not sure what happened there, no idea how the signature got there. Ty. CSDarrow (talk) 11:39, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
Always wondered how to do this.
Now I know.
Slow edit warring
Hello SCDarrow,
you appear to be edit warring against consensus found at Talk:Men's rights movement#Removal of Williams.2C 1995. I would also caution you against using misleading edit summaries as you did here when you wrote that you "moved" the material when in fact you rewrote and deleted parts of it against consensus and so that the text no longer matches the sources.
I see that you were informed that men's rights movement is on article probation. Please consider this a reminder. --Sonicyouth86 (talk) 10:16, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Don't come into my talk page you ignorant peasant and lecture me on the do's and don't of Misplaced Pages. You actions on the Mens Rights site appalling and is compromising the whole Misplaced Pages concept. CSDarrow (talk) 13:37, 11 March 2013 (UTC)