| Revision as of 14:19, 22 March 2013 editMiszaBot III (talk | contribs)597,462 editsm Robot: Archiving 1 thread (older than 10d) to User talk:Geraldo Perez/Archive 3.← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:31, 24 March 2013 edit undoGeraldo Perez (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers260,032 edits →WHO DO YOU THINK U ARE?: rNext edit → | ||
| (7 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
| :: There might be a way to do that with webcite or something. I agree with you the references can be combined with your sorted search that you listed. -] (]) 17:10, 18 March 2013 (UTC) | :: There might be a way to do that with webcite or something. I agree with you the references can be combined with your sorted search that you listed. -] (]) 17:10, 18 March 2013 (UTC) | ||
| :::You're right that an actual link is not necessary but it is always a good idea to give other editors some help to verify info, particularly when I ''know'' that other codes will be added with that claim that won't actually be supported there. I suggest a web cite with the URL link to http://cocatalog.loc.gov and additional info in the cite to search for "DISNEY AUSTIN & ALLY". That should be short, sufficient and easy to use for ]. ] (]) 17:17, 18 March 2013 (UTC) | :::You're right that an actual link is not necessary but it is always a good idea to give other editors some help to verify info, particularly when I ''know'' that other codes will be added with that claim that won't actually be supported there. I suggest a web cite with the URL link to http://cocatalog.loc.gov and additional info in the cite to search for "DISNEY AUSTIN & ALLY". That should be short, sufficient and easy to use for ]. ] (]) 17:17, 18 March 2013 (UTC) | ||
| == WHO DO YOU THINK U ARE? == | |||
| Hello. Why are you ALWAYS spying on me? You are always blocking me and it's like you wanna win 'anti-vandalism' points for it. LET ME ALONE, I'M SOOOO TIRED. SOME CHANGES I DO ARE NOT FOR VANDALISM JUST FOR HELP !! And you are not the boss of Misplaced Pages, ok? You are sooo mad. Bye. ] (]) 19:48, 24 March 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :He can communicate - lots of people were wondering for a while. Nobody said any of your edits were vandalism. Some of your edits were just disruptive in that some didn't follow Misplaced Pages policy and guidelines. That causes other editors time and effort to clean those up. You appeared to ignore attempts to explain stuff on your talk page. 2 things to help: don't change genres without a reference and explain what you are doing in edit summaries. ] (]) 19:51, 24 March 2013 (UTC) | |||
| Okey but you are puting down EVERYTHING I EDIT. For example, 'Selena Gomez discography' with Disney separation. Sorry but i don't understand the first phrase of your comment. Some times i just don't find the genre source but it's too obious. I just want to know why you are blocking me EVERYTIME. And can you add her the electropop genre? I TELL YOU THIS BECAUSE I'M JUST SURE THAT SOMEBODY IT'S GONNA PUT IT DOWN. I think i just need help. ] (]) 20:16, 24 March 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :I can't block you as I am not an administrator. I want to help you become a better editor. | |||
| :There is a process for doing article splits that we need to follow. Must at least say what you are doing in edit histories of old and new articles. | |||
| :A genre obvious to you is still just your opinion. Find a published review that says what the genre is and use it as a reference. Or start a discussion on the talk page to see if other editors agree. It might be best for now to not change any genres as this may lead to further blocks. | |||
| :It is good to ask for help and talk with other editors. ] (]) 20:31, 24 March 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:31, 24 March 2013
| This is a subpage of Geraldo Perez's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Please post new messages at the bottom of my talk page. Please use headlines when starting new talk topics. Thank you.
Austin & Ally production codes
The US Copyright Office has some official production codes you can use to affirm the episode listings for Austin & Ally. LINK They don't have all the second season ones listed but you can use it to shore up the first season ones. -AngusWOOF (talk) 16:51, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
- Looks good. This search may be better as a single cite that supports all they have instead of separate cites to each individual episode. Geraldo Perez (talk) 16:55, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
- Looks like link to search results is transient and can't be depended on. I wonder if there is a way to fix that. Would be best to have a single cite for all the production codes if possible. Geraldo Perez (talk) 16:57, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
- If you want you can post a reference saying that those particular production codes are confirmed by the United States Copyright Office, then the link won't be necessary it won't be so dependent on "search results" for the individual records. I don't know if they have a better way of listing them like they do for some library system entries. -AngusWOOF (talk) 17:06, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
- There might be a way to do that with webcite or something. I agree with you the references can be combined with your sorted search that you listed. -AngusWOOF (talk) 17:10, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
- You're right that an actual link is not necessary but it is always a good idea to give other editors some help to verify info, particularly when I know that other codes will be added with that claim that won't actually be supported there. I suggest a web cite with the URL link to http://cocatalog.loc.gov and additional info in the cite to search for "DISNEY AUSTIN & ALLY". That should be short, sufficient and easy to use for verification. Geraldo Perez (talk) 17:17, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
WHO DO YOU THINK U ARE?
Hello. Why are you ALWAYS spying on me? You are always blocking me and it's like you wanna win 'anti-vandalism' points for it. LET ME ALONE, I'M SOOOO TIRED. SOME CHANGES I DO ARE NOT FOR VANDALISM JUST FOR HELP !! And you are not the boss of Misplaced Pages, ok? You are sooo mad. Bye. Headstrong4ever (talk) 19:48, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
- He can communicate - lots of people were wondering for a while. Nobody said any of your edits were vandalism. Some of your edits were just disruptive in that some didn't follow Misplaced Pages policy and guidelines. That causes other editors time and effort to clean those up. You appeared to ignore attempts to explain stuff on your talk page. 2 things to help: don't change genres without a reference and explain what you are doing in edit summaries. Geraldo Perez (talk) 19:51, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
Okey but you are puting down EVERYTHING I EDIT. For example, 'Selena Gomez discography' with Disney separation. Sorry but i don't understand the first phrase of your comment. Some times i just don't find the genre source but it's too obious. I just want to know why you are blocking me EVERYTIME. And can you add her the electropop genre? I TELL YOU THIS BECAUSE I'M JUST SURE THAT SOMEBODY IT'S GONNA PUT IT DOWN. I think i just need help. Headstrong4ever (talk) 20:16, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
- I can't block you as I am not an administrator. I want to help you become a better editor.
- There is a process for doing article splits that we need to follow. Must at least say what you are doing in edit histories of old and new articles.
- A genre obvious to you is still just your opinion. Find a published review that says what the genre is and use it as a reference. Or start a discussion on the talk page to see if other editors agree. It might be best for now to not change any genres as this may lead to further blocks.
- It is good to ask for help and talk with other editors. Geraldo Perez (talk) 20:31, 24 March 2013 (UTC)