Misplaced Pages

:Administrator intervention against vandalism: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 16:07, 23 May 2013 editHBC AIV helperbot7 (talk | contribs)253,005 editsm 2 reports remaining. Reset instruction block.← Previous edit Revision as of 16:09, 23 May 2013 edit undoOhwrotcod (talk | contribs)166 edits →User-reportedNext edit →
Line 29: Line 29:


*{{IPvandal|50.155.171.83}} - continued vandalism despite warnings. ]]....] ''eating shoes for just 7 years'' 16:02, 23 May 2013 (UTC) *{{IPvandal|50.155.171.83}} - continued vandalism despite warnings. ]]....] ''eating shoes for just 7 years'' 16:02, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

]. Removing proposed deletion tags from articles that have been listed as unsourced for in some cases five years. Example(of many) . Also taken it upon him/herself to redirect articles without first having discussed possible issues . I understand is he/she wishes articles to be redirected, but surely he/she needs to discuss it before simply doing it? Likewise, is he/she feels that the articles that have been pfd are worthy, wouldn't it be far better to discuss it, rather than remove the tags with no reason given(and they remain with no RS)? (PS. I am the 41 IP who has just created an account)] (]) 16:09, 23 May 2013 (UTC) <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 16:03, 23 May 2013 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

Revision as of 16:09, 23 May 2013

Noticeboards
Misplaced Pages's centralized discussion, request, and help venues. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the dashboard. For a related set of forums which do not function as noticeboards see formal review processes.
General
Articles,
content
Page handling
User conduct
Other
Category:Misplaced Pages noticeboards
    Report active, obvious, and persistent vandals and spammers here. Shortcut

    Before reporting, read the spam and vandalism pages, as well as the AIV guide. To submit, edit this page and follow the instructions at the top of the "User-reported" section. For other issues, file a request for administrator attention.

    Important!
    1. The edits of the user must be obvious vandalism or obvious spam.
    2. Except for egregious cases, the user must have been given enough warning(s).
    3. The warning(s) must have been given recently and there must be reasonable grounds to believe the user(s) will further disrupt the site in the immediate future.
    4. If you decide that a report should be filed, place the following template at the bottom of the User-reported section:
      • * {{Vandal|Example user or IP}} Your concise reason (e.g. vandalised past 4th warning). ~~~~
    5. Requests for further sanctions against a blocked user (e.g., talk page, e-mail blocks) should be made at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
    6. Reports of sockpuppetry should be made at Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations unless the connection between the accounts is obvious and disruption is recent and ongoing.
    This noticeboard can grow and become backlogged. Stale reports are automatically cleared by MDanielsBot after 4–8 hours with no action.
    You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

    This page was last updated at 19:05 on 22 January 2025 (UTC). Purge the cache of this page if it is out of date.



    Reports

    Bot-reported

    User-reported

    List begins BELOW this line -->

    User:Bondegezou. Removing proposed deletion tags from articles that have been listed as unsourced for in some cases five years. Example(of many) . Also taken it upon him/herself to redirect articles without first having discussed possible issues . I understand is he/she wishes articles to be redirected, but surely he/she needs to discuss it before simply doing it? Likewise, is he/she feels that the articles that have been pfd are worthy, wouldn't it be far better to discuss it, rather than remove the tags with no reason given(and they remain with no RS)? (PS. I am the 41 IP who has just created an account)Ohwrotcod (talk) 16:09, 23 May 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ohwrotcod (talk • contribs) 16:03, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

    Categories:
    Misplaced Pages:Administrator intervention against vandalism: Difference between revisions Add topic