Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 14:27, 2 June 2013

This is VanishedUser sdu8asdasd's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Misplaced Pages? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18Auto-archiving period: 31 days

Bluenose

I have that misfortune. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 16:49, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for fixing it. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 16:56, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

Zytek history

I noticed your creation of the Ginetta-Zytek GZ09S article from your adding links to various other articles, and I think I have a slight problem with the article as it stands now. You have the racing history of the 09S covered fairly well, but I think you might be missing a part of the larger picture when it comes to these cars. I'll try not to ramble on and keep this simple. Zytek's race car naming and numbering is a bit complicated, a bit like Lola's.

The original Zyteks were of course the Reynard 02S, bought by IRM as the BA 03S, then bought by Zytek to become the 04S. This design continued as additional chassis were built as the 05S and 06S. In 2006, new regulations came into effect that required a chassis redesign for all LMPs by the start of the 2007 season. Zytek adapted by developing the 07S and 07S/2, of which they built three (Chassis 01 for Barazi-Epsilon, Chassis 02 for Arena, and Chassis 03 for Team LNT). These three cars continued into 2008, with Arena's car sold to Corsa Motorsports in the US, and LNT's car going to Karim Ojjeh, for use by Race Performance.

In 2008 Lawrence Tomlinson, founder of the LNT Group, became a shareholder in the Zytek Group. LNT were also the owners of the Ginetta brand. Through this connection, Zytek became sponsored by Ginetta. The first fruit of this partnership was 2008 Petit Le Mans, where LNT entered a brand new Chassis 04 as Ginetta-Zytek 07S. This was followed by the start of the 2009 season with the construction of two more chassis, Chassis 05 for ASM and Chassis 06 for LNT to replace 04 which they sold off to Strakka. Now, all three of these cars were branded as Ginetta-Zytek 09S and 09S/2 (or GZ09S and GZ09S/2, both styles have been used). However, all three 07S's also continued to be used into 2009: Barazi kept Chassis 01, Corsa upgraded their Chassis 02 to the Hybrid and rebadged it as a Ginetta-Zytek, and Ojjeh kept his Chassis 03, now under the GAC banner. There is however nothing fundamentally different about the 07S and the 09S, they are simply evolutions of the same design with minor differences underneath, but completely identical in terms of bodywork. Note that even in 2009, the Ginetta badge was not applied to most of the old 07S. (ACO press release mentioning "Zytek" and "Ginetta-Zytek" as seperate entities in the LMP2 category)

For 2010, Chassis 01 and 02 were no longer in use. Ojjeh's 03 now moved to Greaves, where it finally picked up the Ginetta moniker. 04 went from Strakka to Beechdean-Mansell, 05 stayed with ASM, and 06 stayed at LNT. In 2011, the LMP regulations were changed once more, specifically in regards to the engine sizes, forcing everyone to redevelop their cars for smaller or larger engines in time for 2012. Zytek partnered with Nismo to develop the Nissan V8, and thus that engine became the sole powerplant for the redesigned Zytek chassis, the Z11SN (N for Nissan). Due to the partnership with Nissan, the Ginetta badging was dropped from the new batch of cars. ASM continued to run their 09S for 2011, while MIK Corse used the old 07S Chassis 01 for their Hybrid, however note that both of them dropped the Ginetta badging. MIK's car is now Zytek 09S Hybrid, and ASM's car now becomes Zytek 09SC. After 2011, the 07S and 09S chassis were no longer legal, so everyone now is running the Z11SN.

So, in short, there are three generations of chassis from Zytek. The Reynard 02S-based cars from 2002 to 2006, the 07S-based cars from 2007 to 2011, and the Z11SN from 2011 onward. So my problem with your article, as it stands now, is that it ignores the fact that the "Ginetta-Zytek GZ09S" has in fact been in use since 2007. This is akin to the Acura ARX-01 article, which covers all evolutions of the same basic chassis from the ARX-01a to the ARX-01g, or the Lola B08/60 which continues on to this day as the B12/60. The5₉ (Talk) 05:40, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

• It's a fair point, but I had the intention of creating the 07S article somewhere down the line. You're correct that I've not done much about the chassis history; this is due to the fact I've not seen a lot of sources on this matter (it may well be I'm looking in the wrong place, but I digress). I think the Acura setup is appropriate, but in this case, the Ginetta-Zytek is just about independent enough of the 07S to warrant its own article; although this is an OTHERSTUFF argument, it's no different to the procedure with a lot of F1 car articles (which may not be the Prototype group's SOP, but nor is it a bad thing). I had spotted the Ginetta-Zytek 07S, as it caught me out when I first did the article. When I get chance, I'll add information on the chassis evolution, and will eventually get around to doing the 07S (and Z11SN, for that matter) articles. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 07:16, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

• I've now added some information about the 07S and the Z11SN in the article, which has had the bonus of making the lead much better as well. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 09:29, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

My point wasn't that the article didn't include chassis history, my point was more the fact that some 09S's are in fact just 07S's with new titles. Therefore some of these cars existed before 2009. Although most modern Formula One articles do have an individual page for each year, many past cars, such as the Ferrari 412T and McLaren MP4/1, have all evolutions based on the same basic architecture in a single article. This is mainly due to modern cars carrying almost no parts over from the previous years. My argument is just that there doesn't seem to be enough difference between the 07S and 09S to warrant splitting the two up, at least that I am aware of off-hand. The5₉ (Talk) 19:28, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

• I'm going to be anal and say that it's because the 07S was designed for a different version of regs than the 09S (and that it wasn't just engine variations or whatever). I wouldn't have any real issue if a general consensus came about that the 07S and 09S should be in one article, although I would prefer it to be formatted like my style, rather than the B08/60 format, which is rather messy (as in, the different models being distinctly visible on their own, not merging together all over the place.) Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 20:10, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

For now, it's over

Just so you know, per Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Msoamu/Archive Shabiha, Sunnibarelvi and Am Not New have been banned just like Child Start Grown Up and Trust on ALLAH, along with a two-week block for Msoamu. You remember, that SPI about someone unrelated in which I first suggested that Msoamu and Shabiha were somehow connected via MSO AMU and you suggested I remove it from that other SPI because it seemed paranoid and could boomerang onto me? Well, now what I suspected about them since at least 2009 has been confirmed, and I will have to fight being paranoid all the time. See you again in two weeks, or when the next sock puppet account pops up. MezzoMezzo (talk) 02:56, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

• I've been watching it, and I was more suggesting that there was no link between Child Star Grown Up and Shabiha/Msoamu/whatever - which I was right about. I told you to withdraw that allegation as some may have tried to use it as a bad-faith suggestion, and because if there was a link, that CU would've turned it up. 6 years of successful sockpuppetry, before being blocked, must be some kind of record. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 07:20, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

• Also, I was the one who first made the link between Am Not New and CSGU, even though I wasn't convinced by it. ;) Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 07:23, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

Out-of-sequence comment

Luke, I just wanted to let you know that we had an edit conflict just now at Misplaced Pages:Articles_for_deletion/FC_Ridings. You made your comment first but I decided to add mine above yours so that it was clear that when I said "you", I meant the editor we were both replying to (Markreeves94), rather than you. I hope you don't feel that was inappropriate. Dricherby (talk) 13:31, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

• I appreciate the heads-up, and I wonder if the IP and the account are linked to one person, or just linked to the club. I don't plan on running an SPI, though. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 13:34, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

I think it's quite likely that they're the same person but, at this stage, I'm happy to accept that the user doesn't stay logged into his account. I agree that it's probably not worth SPIing, though it might be worth it if they both !vote. Also, I note that there are two Mark Reeveses who play for the club so I'll flag that COI at the AfD. Dricherby (talk) 13:40, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

• Unless I'm very much mistaken (Murray Walker ftw), they have both voted. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 13:43, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

• Fat lot of good it did them, if they were the same person. :-) Dricherby (talk) 17:55, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

Matt Leto

What do you think? I might concede I was wrong on this one :D Judgesurreal777 (talk) 14:41, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

• That's fantastic work! The fact that you have done all of this work, having been solidly of the view point that he wasn't notable, is a credit to yourself and Misplaced Pages, and I wish we had ten more like you. We might've clashed a bit in that AfD, but you've earned a lot of respect with this. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 14:54, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

Apparent unconstructive comment

I have been told that my edit to Mavado is unconstructive and classed as vandalism. It is quite well know in Jamaica that Mavado is the only person to have announced and proven that he has a micropenis. Therefore I do not believe my edit should have been removed. If you are not going to put it back then I'll have to make my own page and include ALL the correct information about him. Regards

• Well, you've got guts, I'll give you that, but unless you can provide multiple reliable sources that mention this "fact", then all that will end up happening is that you will be blocked for vandalism and for violating WP:BLP. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 14:59, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Fahey

Player contracts run until 30 June, so until it expires or he signs elsewhere, he's contracted to BCFC. What I've done in the past with the club article squad section, is mark released players with a * and add a note below the squad list, as at this version, so it's clear who's going, but the squad list still reflects the fact that those players are under contract. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 20:11, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

He looked as good as ever when he came back. Was a little surprised the finances allowed the option on Burke to be taken up. What's concerning is how many of the saleable players, not that there are very many, will have to go as well. The AGM on Friday might be interesting. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 20:45, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

No, I didn't. You undid these two edits as "unsourced hoax", but left these three, which I removed as "remaining vandalism". cheers, Struway2 (talk) 13:18, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
	Congrats Bobherry talk 13:21, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

• Thanks, may I ask what this is for? :) Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 13:28, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Reply to Why a Barnstar

Hmm... Random Acts and I just gave Revert to Artcle you edited recently for vandilism to yours. Bobherry talk 17:28, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

• Well, thank you. :) Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 17:32, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
  • No problem! Sorry by the way i'm not the best typer. Bobherry talk 19:00, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

ANI

In an ANI discussion, you wrote

I don't see any issue with the close either. Sure, it's a tight decision, but I'm glad we have admins who have the guts to do those, and they shouldn't be abused by people whom lost out as a result.)

Why do you feel that the concerns I mentioned there are invalid? Or do you agree with me that my concerns are legitimate? And yes, I do appreciate the hard work of judging consensus, but that doesn't give admins permission to do what ever they want regardless of policy. -- Ypnypn (talk) 01:33, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

• Give it a rest, will you? How many people need to tell you that there was absolutely nothing wrong with the close, other than it didn't go your way? Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 07:02, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
  • Thank you for answering. I now understand that you do not have a response to my reason. I will not discuss this with you any further, since you seem to want to leave this issue behind. -- Ypnypn (talk) 13:22, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Winner winner, chicken dinner

God this is hilarious. I'm actually happy he's doing this, the boomerang effect could end a lot of this mess. Wait I just read your comments, you said the exact same thing...so *I* must be a sockpuppet of *you*! MezzoMezzo (talk) 07:40, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

• Yep! The highly amusing thing is that it is so blatantly obvious that this user is a sock, cos they're a brand new editor. Brilliant. I think everyone that disagreed with CSGU appears to be a sock, based on that SPI... *rolls eyes* Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 07:44, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

Wait, was Pass a Method even involved in that SPI? I thought he just got sucked into this now. MezzoMezzo (talk) 08:02, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

• Fuck knows, but I doubt it. You're a Scottish Muslim, and I'm English and not a Muslim, so we're clearly the same person *nods* Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 08:05, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages should add a "like" function for talk pages comments. MezzoMezzo (talk) 08:22, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

Martinez

Haha, no worries! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.9.142.252 (talk) 22:13, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

Share the Cookies

	Here's a plate full of cookies to share!
	Hi VanishedUser sdu8asdasd, here are some delicious cookies to help brighten your day! However, there are too many cookies here for one person to eat all at once, so please share these cookies with at least two other editors by copying {{subst:Sharethecookies}} to their talk pages. Enjoy! AutomaticStrikeout  ?  16:41, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

• Muchas gracias, as they say in Spain. :) Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 16:49, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

• You're welcome, as they as in the United States. :) AutomaticStrikeout  ?  16:53, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

• Loving the edit summary :D Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 16:58, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

• Good! AutomaticStrikeout  ?  18:09, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

Incorrect data Australian Touring Car Racing

Hi Luke!,

A colleague of mine recently forwarded a Misplaced Pages reference (copy below) showing that he had changed my name from my 'Nick' name to my correct birth name within all references for Australian Sports car and Touring car racing!.

"An unregistered user is habitually changing all Denis Horley entries to James (Denis) Horley. I have reverted most of these and added references to support the use of “Denis Horley”, but I have nothing on the 1987 Pepsi 250 results on this page. Can anyone help please? GTHO (talk) 09:48, 30 May 2011 (UTC)"

As such, I would like to chat with you regarding changing the reference to my correct name of James (Denis) Horley (the name on my birth certificate, CAMS Licence etc.)

I understand that various programs and results were printed using James(Denis)Horley as it was the name used by various people at that time perhapes in the same way of Ian(Pete)Geoghegan.

I would be happy to forward you copies of the above and then correct the Misplaced Pages pages accordingly.

I look forward to hearing from you

James Horley

Contact details james.horley@hotmail.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by Grandprixeng (talk • contribs) 06:18, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

• Whilst I am fully inclined to believe you, unfortunately, I'm really struggling to find much in the way of sources at all. This uses the Denis Horley name, but is obviously far from complete. is a little more complete, but still seems to have the "Denis Horley" name, as does this list here: . Have you got any online links to 1980s ATCC race-day programs/entry lists, or any more sources? If you do, and there's enough of them, I'll consider writing your article as well (although I would strongly suggest that you don't edit it yourself, other than to correct any spelling mistakes. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 07:09, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Randolph

Randolph is coming, in July when his contract expires, though I imagine he'll still be playing for Motherwell on Sunday :-) But the only reliable sources for a current transfer being completed are the clubs involved: media organisations do tend to announce an expected transfer as complete before it is, to avoid the risk of being pre-empted by other media organisations, or to prove how up-to-the-minute and well-informed they are. There was a discussion about that here. When I checked the club sites before reverting, they hadn't confirmed, although they did shortly afterwards. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 15:14, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for fixing this. Not sure what happened there but presume a mis-click on rollback. - Sitush (talk) 18:11, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

• I'm not sure either. I'm glad it was a mistake, as I had no idea why you did that, and it freaked me out a tad. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 18:13, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

• Sorry about that, really. AE is on my watchlist but I've not actually been watching it these last few days, if you see what I mean. I don't use rollback particularly often, so making a mistake like that will at least bump up my usage stats! - Sitush (talk) 18:15, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

• I've wandered around AE before, but can't think of any time I've actually posted there (which is partially why I freaked out a bit xD) Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 18:20, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

Why do you revert my Changes

Hy may I ask why do you change my changes? Cretman121 (talk) 08:17, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

• Firstly, welcome to Misplaced Pages, and I hope this experience doesn't put you off! Secondly, I reverted your changes because they appeared to violate one of our policies, which prohibits the use of original research - edits made that are either unsourced, or use sources in an incorrect manner. Please read WP:OR, and if you have any further questions, feel free to ask. :) Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 08:20, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

Thanks and now I get it but still may I ask another question. As I really cant find a source that software scheduling is not affecting compute performances in Geforce 600, How can I proceed? And Thanks again for being so polite and nice for my mistake.

• Not a problem, and if you can't find any WP:RS compliant sources, then you can't make the edit. :) Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 08:44, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

Okay Thanks. I gonna try to dig some more source including at Nvidia's but if I cant find any reliable sources then I will revert my own chances. Cretman121 (talk) 08:57, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

St. Patrick's Classical School's crest

Hello Luke,

StPatsCrest.png is the crest of St. Patrick's Classical School. I was wondering if you could change the External Ornaments from black to green as shown in

External Ornaments of a Bishop.svg as the school is under the patronage of a Bishop, not a Abbot. But would you keep the motto of the school black and the other designs the same if you could. I would greatly appreciate this kind change as I am not as skilled enough. Thanks

(Baron Langford, talk) 12:45, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

• I'm not sure what you want me to do, to be honest. I'm not a skilled image editor, and besides, I don't see what would be achieved by this, unless you can show some evidence to prove that the real school's crest has changed. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 12:30, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

I mentioned you

here. — alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 19:32, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

• Echo means that I already receive such notifications, but thanks. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 19:48, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

I know it does, but I still think it's good form to drop an actual message. Thanks for responding over there.— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 19:54, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

22 song

I added a reference for Swift's performance but instead of removing my line, you could have just added a Cn tag and that would have been fine. Otherwise you can remove all the lines that preceded what I added since they are unsourced as well... --Sofffie7 (talk) 21:32, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

• Not everything needs to go because it is unsourced, but anything of that kind (stating they were part of a major awards ceremony) requires a reference - the burden is on the adding editor to find a reference, not other editors to reference it for them (or even tag it as unsourced). Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 07:05, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

Draft topic ban Jax

I would like to see you comments and additions to User:The Banner/Workpage28, the draft for a topic ban proposal regarding Jax 0677. Hope to hear soon. The Banner talk 12:11, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

• Where do you wish me to put my comments? :) Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 12:56, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

At the talkpage there. The Banner talk 14:12, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

Now see what you've done!

Picking on harmless Swedish academics! You should be ashamed of yourself. EEng (talk) 05:19, 22 May 2013 (UTC) BTW, what is fly-ash, anyway?

• Are you actually being serious? For one, you're clearly gullible enough to believe that story. For another, this user is so harmless that they have launched a stream of attacks against various users, rejected any attempts at being helped, solicited meatpuppet IPs, and used a sockpuppet account (note that I didn't file the investigation against that one). Clearly, this user is harmless and an asset to Misplaced Pages... I have no idea what Fly-ash is, look up its page here. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 06:56, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

If I'd said, "Picking on harmless Swedish academics whose only wish was to give due recognition to material scientists who have labored long in obscurity making the world a better place by energetically modifying cement," would it have been clearer whether I was serious or not? EEng (talk) 11:32, 22 May 2013 (UTC) P.S. Fly-ash is apparently something that goes into cement -- Jono was always talking about it.

• Ah, I see what you mean, reading things before 8 in the morning clearly doesn't work for me :D Based on that, I presume you didn't buy the collapsing story either? Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 12:13, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

I thought about suggesting Jono check out Help:Collapsing but I would have been pilloried. EEng (talk) 13:12, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

• There's a place for people like you... ;) Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 13:28, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Lee Novak

Let's get a discussion going at Talk:Lee Novak please. GiantSnowman 11:27, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Re:Oops

Hi there, no worries, if you need any help with MOS/writing articles in future then let me know, I've started over 3,000 of the buggers so I should (hopefully!) know a thing or two. Oh, and thanks for cleaning up my clean up ;) GiantSnowman 15:46, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

• None of us are perfect, I usually focus more on neutralizing language and expanding articles than making them 100% stylistically perfect, (although that's not saying I would deliberately mess up an article!) apart from when I GA nom an article :D Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 15:49, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Well, let's at least get you started on the path toward stylistic perfection: None of us are perfect => None of us is perfect. :P EEng (talk) 00:04, 24 May 2013 (UTC) (I'm stuck somewhere just now and have nothing better to do than give you a hard time, you see.)

• I disagree that the above is the correct way to say that. :p Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 07:00, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Well, none of us is exempt from error. :P EEng (talk) 08:09, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

Alansohn discussion at ANI

Thank you for participating in the ANI discussion, and for having the decency for stating the obvious: That Alansohn was wrong in what he did. However, you stated nothing further after Alan's response, and the discussion was archived, before I could even respond, as I have been busy with other things outside of Misplaced Pages. I've restored it, with my response, evidence from the past 6 years of his behavior, and a call for a resolution. Can you please offer your thoughts? Thank you. Nightscream (talk) 04:47, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Afds

I think your missing the point, regardless of how i nominated them or whether i called them groups are not. I came to the conclusion these artists are clearly non notable people that do not deserve a Misplaced Pages page. So there is no need to keep leaving harsh comments like i don't know what i'm doing. Koala15 (talk) 14:11, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

• At least one of those AFDs certainly suggests that they are a notable group/musician. Not only that, your rationale of "non-notable x" is quite vague, and is thus easily defeated. I was attempting to advise you on how you could improve; if you don't wish to take my advice, fine, but someone may well get very frustrated with you, if you continue in this manner. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 14:38, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Proposal: topic ban for Jax 0677 regarding templates

FYI: the proposal is filed here The Banner talk 15:45, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

A brownie for you!

Thank you for all the hard work on the Philadelphia University Article. The vandalism has been frequent lately. The assistance is much appreciated. Gruganc (talk) 15:52, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Another sock?

I was doing a sweep of some articles and happened upon an article for a Barelvi cleric which I had cleaned up - an article for a cleric whom I actually like, ironically enough. I was then accused of vandalism while being reverted here, here and here. What do you make of the language of this Ecomaster guy? Another long time sock? Considering that we just saw a six-year sock banned, it is theoretically possible. MezzoMezzo (talk) 07:19, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

• It's plausible, but the account is stale at present, and I can't see any "smoking gun" in the edit summaries, which is all I have to go on - since this user has never utilized a talkpage. I'm currently more inclined to believe that this is actually a third editor (ie, not CSGU or Msoamu) at present, but they're definitely worth keeping an eye on. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 08:43, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

How Rude...!

Of me! Woops ;-) Narom (talk) 16:43, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

• Was wondering what this referred to at first xD - not sure quite how you managed to break my sig, yet, you did. :p Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 17:22, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

WP:FOOTBALL

I agree, and would say we need to come up with new, detailed notability/MOS pages to provide guidance on all issues related to football. GiantSnowman 09:16, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

Joaquín Carbonell

Great, cheers! GiantSnowman 17:18, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

Kevin Phillips

In my experience, a {{cn}} tag usuall has little-to-no effect. It is much better to remove and then re-add with reliable sourcing, rather than allowing unsourced and potentially poor material to remain on the off-chance someone comes along and starts citing. GiantSnowman 17:28, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.

IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
17		Bohlin Cywinski Jackson (talk)						Add sources
29		Ahmad Saeed Kazmi (talk)						Add sources
25		Burpee Museum of Natural History (talk)						Add sources
4		British Schools Karting Championship (talk)						Add sources
1,167		Ella Riot (talk)						Add sources
11		Superstox (talk)						Add sources
286		Honda Civic (fourth generation) (talk)						Cleanup
30		José Hilario López (talk)						Cleanup
18		2011 British Formula Three season (talk)						Cleanup
14		Southport (Metro-North station) (talk)						Expand
36		Afan Lido F.C. (talk)						Expand
806		Hotel rating (talk)						Expand
235		1991 Formula One season (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
67		Limousine liberal (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
492		Honda Civic (seventh generation) (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
1,373		Tizen (talk)						Merge
271		Victimless crime (talk)						Merge
4		Cooper T12 (talk)						Merge
26		Silverstone Britcar 24-Hour (talk)						Wikify
3		2010 Renault Clio Cup United Kingdom season (talk)						Wikify
752		Muhammad Tahir-ul-Qadri (talk)						Wikify
8		Josefina Aldecoa (talk)						Orphan
2		2011 Mini 7 Racing Club season (talk)						Orphan
2		Dov Lupi (talk)						Orphan
5		2009 Ginetta Junior Championship season (talk)						Stub
4		Nissen Award (talk)						Stub
2		Mark Lemmer (talk)						Stub
4		Alien's Return (talk)						Stub
8		H2L2 (talk)						Stub
4		Chagurin (talk)						Stub

Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions

We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:

Views/Day

Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.

Quality

Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.

The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:

Content

Is more content needed?

Headings

Does this article have an appropriate section structure?

Images

Is the number of illustrative images about right?

Links

Does this article link to enough other Misplaced Pages articles?

Sources

For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Misplaced Pages better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:10, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Phillips sourcing

Hello. Please see Talk:Kevin Phillips (footballer)#Sourcing. All I personally intend to do is source and restore any sections of the pre-cleanup version that no-one gets to first. If anyone wants to improve/expand beyond that, I'm sure the readers would appreciate it. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 09:36, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

• I'll look into it. :) Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 09:42, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Sunbeam Tiger

"And Martin Buckley's Classic Cars A Celebration of the Motor Car From 1945 to 1975 says 571. (ISBN number: 1-84477-023-0) - definitely some major variation in the production numbers. Do you have a page number for that? Eric Corbett 17:59, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

• P235. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 18:14, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

  Excellent, thanks. If you're interested I think I've got to the bottom of why there's such a large discrepancy in the Tiger II production figures quoted in different sources, and added a note to the article in an effort to explain what I think is going on. Eric Corbett 19:03, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

• Seen it, and it does make sense. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 19:06, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

My Roberto Martinez edit

Sorry I didn't leave an edit summary (I hit submit by mistake), but what I meant to note was that Sky Sports sources say y&r same thing BBC does - he's been given permission to leave, but it hasn't happened yet ( and I imagine Wigan will seek compensation, so there's more that needs to happen before the separation is official). Mosmof (talk) 22:26, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

• "Manager Roberto Martinez has decided to leave Wigan" - regardless of whether or not he is taking the job, he's leaving Wigan. If you look at the Football page of Sky Sports, it says "Wigan exit confirmed". My edit was correct, and I will restore it. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 08:07, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

Right - but it's saying that a future exit is confirmed. I realize this feels like it's picking at nits, but "Martinez is leaving" is different from "Martinez has left". As things stands, he is still Wigan's manager. It's like if you're engaged to be married - that doesn't mean you're married yet. --Mosmof (talk) 14:31, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

Reverting

Please don't take offence, but you'd probably do better sticking to the automatic edit summaries rather than drawing attention to this sort of thing. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 16:47, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Misplaced Pages:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The thread is "Misplaced Pages:requests for adminship/Mattythewhite". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! EarwigBot  14:23, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Enough is enough. It's clear this is a conflict of interest that must be resolved outside the page. 174.252.35.200 (talk) 14:27, 2 June 2013 (UTC)