| Revision as of 10:31, 18 June 2013 editFeelSunny (talk | contribs)2,988 edits →Reverts in Konigsberg: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 10:35, 18 June 2013 edit undoFeelSunny (talk | contribs)2,988 edits →Reverts in KonigsbergNext edit → | ||
| Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
| Hi Herkus, could you please explain what was the reason for the revert? I thought the lead in the previous version talked twice about the same moment, i.e. late WW3 events. What was the issue with the new version? Thanks, ] (]) 10:31, 18 June 2013 (UTC) | Hi Herkus, could you please explain what was the reason for the revert? I thought the lead in the previous version talked twice about the same moment, i.e. late WW3 events. What was the issue with the new version? Thanks, ] (]) 10:31, 18 June 2013 (UTC) | ||
| :Oh, never mind, actually. Now that I noticed Marek and Piotrus frequently messaging you, I see no reasons for any further contacts. Bye. ] (]) 10:35, 18 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 10:35, 18 June 2013
 Archives |
scotty
why did you dillited my edit? The accident was in did in Kaliningrad. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ScottyNolan (talk • contribs) 10:38, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
Copernicus article
Hello Herkus Monte,
could you have an eye on the Copernicus page. Copernicus birthday seems to have brought out Polish nationalists. I don't like to get in an edit war, so having a second pair of eyes looking at the article is a good thing. I ask you this because I noticed that you have a strong interest in Prussian history are involved in these matters for a long time.
Cheers, Larkusix — Preceding unsigned comment added by Larkusix (talk • contribs) 21:00, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
- Where is consensus about Czesław Miłosz as expert of history and Italian lang. as important for Kopernik page? --Piotr967 (talk) 14:28, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Royal Prussia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marienburg (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:18, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
Nicolaus Copernicus
It is disturbing to see what appears to be a nationalist edit war starting up again at Nicolaus Copernicus. If you believe you have obtained a talk page consensus for your changes at the Copernicus article, please link to it. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 17:16, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
Baysen/Bazynski
Herkus, please see my comments here. Can you provide ANY English language sources to support the name to which you keep moving the article? I'm getting a little tired of raising this point on discussion, only to be ignored for months and years, yet, when I actually make a change it is swiftly reverted within the same day. If you have time to revert and move-war, you should have time to look for sources which actually support the name. And provide them. Thanks. Volunteer Marek 20:36, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
Erich Weise
We'had disagreements in the past and all, but I've always had respect for you. But seriously, trying to defend a Nazi archivist who was involved in plunder and war crimes? This is not a fight worth fighting.Volunteer Marek 05:03, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Reverts in Konigsberg
Hi Herkus, could you please explain what was the reason for the revert? I thought the lead in the previous version talked twice about the same moment, i.e. late WW3 events. What was the issue with the new version? Thanks, FeelSunny (talk) 10:31, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
- Oh, never mind, actually. Now that I noticed Marek and Piotrus frequently messaging you, I see no reasons for any further contacts. Bye. FeelSunny (talk) 10:35, 18 June 2013 (UTC)