Misplaced Pages:Featured article candidates/Peru national football team/archive3: Difference between revisions

< Misplaced Pages:Featured article candidates Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 23:54, 25 September 2013 editMarshalN20 (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers15,094 edits →Peru national football team ← Previous edit		Revision as of 15:56, 26 September 2013 edit undoColonelHenry (talk \| contribs)18,072 edits →Peru national football team Next edit →
Line 15:		Line 15:
	:Based on this very unfriendly comment you recently made towards me (see ), it might be for the best if you please do not review this article. Best regards.--] \| ] 20:24, 25 September 2013 (UTC)		:Based on this very unfriendly comment you recently made towards me (see ), it might be for the best if you please do not review this article. Best regards.--] \| ] 20:24, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
	:*This is an acceptable referencing style, and has been used on several FAs (reason why the websites are further below is because they're only cited once). I note, however, that the Virgilio Roel book has no citations leading to it. — ] (]) 22:57, 25 September 2013 (UTC)		:*This is an acceptable referencing style, and has been used on several FAs (reason why the websites are further below is because they're only cited once). I note, however, that the Virgilio Roel book has no citations leading to it. — ] (]) 22:57, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
			::* {{ping\|Crisco 1492}} - I would disagree, but our reasons would likely be subjective. I've seen other FA reviews over the years that have considered this referencing style inconsistent and I believe it inconsistent. I withdraw from further participation in this review because MarshalN20 has been belligerent with me in other areas, but my comment stands for further discussion wherever it goes.
	::Thank you Crisco. I remember renting the Roel book, which is why I listed it, but I seem to have not used a single piece of information from it. I cannot even recall if I read it.--] \| ] 23:54, 25 September 2013 (UTC)		::Thank you Crisco. I remember renting the Roel book, which is why I listed it, but I seem to have not used a single piece of information from it. I cannot even recall if I read it.--] \| ] 23:54, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:56, 26 September 2013

Peru national football team

Toolbox
Analysis Citation bot External links

Nominator(s): MarshalN20 | 00:07, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured article because...the article has already been nominated a couple of times in the past. The article meets FA criteria, especially when compared to Scotland national football team (the other FA national football team). All the article needs is support votes. Regards.--MarshalN20 | 00:07, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Quick Comments - There needs to be one consistent system for citations, per FA criterion 2c, WP:CITE and MOS. The article currently employs two methods...full citations and short citations. If you choose to use full citations, I find the {{rp}} template useful for noting differing page numbers over repeated citations. The article at first glance looks to be quite informative. I will take a second look over the next week if/when the citations are addressed and brought into one consistent system.--ColonelHenry (talk) 12:59, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for the comments. I am a tad confused by the recommendation. I am using the Chicago Manual of Style for citations (same as what I did in the Pisco Sour article). There the footnotes (or "references") have this mixture. Regards.--MarshalN20 | 19:27, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Based on this very unfriendly comment you recently made towards me (see ), it might be for the best if you please do not review this article. Best regards.--MarshalN20 | 20:24, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

This is an acceptable referencing style, and has been used on several FAs (reason why the websites are further below is because they're only cited once). I note, however, that the Virgilio Roel book has no citations leading to it. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 22:57, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

@Crisco 1492: - I would disagree, but our reasons would likely be subjective. I've seen other FA reviews over the years that have considered this referencing style inconsistent and I believe it inconsistent. I withdraw from further participation in this review because MarshalN20 has been belligerent with me in other areas, but my comment stands for further discussion wherever it goes.

Thank you Crisco. I remember renting the Roel book, which is why I listed it, but I seem to have not used a single piece of information from it. I cannot even recall if I read it.--MarshalN20 | 23:54, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:54, 25 September 2013 editMarshalN20 (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers15,094 edits →Peru national football team ← Previous edit		Revision as of 15:56, 26 September 2013 edit undoColonelHenry (talk \| contribs)18,072 edits →Peru national football team Next edit →
Line 15:		Line 15:
	:Based on this very unfriendly comment you recently made towards me (see ), it might be for the best if you please do not review this article. Best regards.--] \| ] 20:24, 25 September 2013 (UTC)		:Based on this very unfriendly comment you recently made towards me (see ), it might be for the best if you please do not review this article. Best regards.--] \| ] 20:24, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
	:*This is an acceptable referencing style, and has been used on several FAs (reason why the websites are further below is because they're only cited once). I note, however, that the Virgilio Roel book has no citations leading to it. — ] (]) 22:57, 25 September 2013 (UTC)		:*This is an acceptable referencing style, and has been used on several FAs (reason why the websites are further below is because they're only cited once). I note, however, that the Virgilio Roel book has no citations leading to it. — ] (]) 22:57, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
			::* {{ping\|Crisco 1492}} - I would disagree, but our reasons would likely be subjective. I've seen other FA reviews over the years that have considered this referencing style inconsistent and I believe it inconsistent. I withdraw from further participation in this review because MarshalN20 has been belligerent with me in other areas, but my comment stands for further discussion wherever it goes.
	::Thank you Crisco. I remember renting the Roel book, which is why I listed it, but I seem to have not used a single piece of information from it. I cannot even recall if I read it.--] \| ] 23:54, 25 September 2013 (UTC)		::Thank you Crisco. I remember renting the Roel book, which is why I listed it, but I seem to have not used a single piece of information from it. I cannot even recall if I read it.--] \| ] 23:54, 25 September 2013 (UTC)