| Revision as of 11:33, 25 October 2013 editTheRedPenOfDoom (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers135,756 edits Undid revision 578678212 by Clock 12:13 (talk) still unsourced, no discussion on talk why WP:BURDEN does not apply← Previous edit | Revision as of 11:34, 25 October 2013 edit undoTheRedPenOfDoom (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers135,756 edits →Final warningNext edit → | ||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
| You may not reinsert unsourced content to ]. ] applies to ALL articles not just the articles that you have been previously warned about. -- ] 11:31, 25 October 2013 (UTC) | You may not reinsert unsourced content to ]. ] applies to ALL articles not just the articles that you have been previously warned about. -- ] 11:31, 25 October 2013 (UTC) | ||
| ] Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. | |||
| To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. See ] for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> -- ] 11:34, 25 October 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 11:34, 25 October 2013
Hai, I am clock. ha ha ha
October 2013
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Misplaced Pages, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you.you are obviously not familiar with the sourcing that is typically used for computing articles. academic and news sources are almost never used, as such sources rarely exist for notable topics. -- Aunva6 15:48, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Automatic invitation to visit WP:Teahouse sent by HostBot
| [REDACTED] |
Hi Clock 12:13! Thanks for contributing to Misplaced Pages. |
Thank you for your contributions to Misplaced Pages. Please make sure to include an edit summary with every edit. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! Ugog Nizdast (talk) 11:22, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
removing tags from articles
Please do not delete tags or content with vague pretexts like "(cleaned up)" instead of a valid edit summary. If you must remove things, please honestly state what you are removing and why; if the edits are controversial, please attempt to gain consensus on the article talk page. K7L (talk) 04:28, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
Final warning
Hello, I'm TheRedPenOfDoom. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Kunchacko Boban, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 11:31, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
You may not reinsert unsourced content to Kunchacko Boban. WP:BURDEN applies to ALL articles not just the articles that you have been previously warned about. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 11:31, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 11:34, 25 October 2013 (UTC)