Misplaced Pages

Talk:Palmer v. Kleargear.com: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 14:31, 20 November 2013 editZhanzhao (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users5,619 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 20:44, 20 November 2013 edit undo71.19.182.114 (talk) Censors of this material MUST be either the crooks themselves or an abject retard. No other options are available.Next edit →
Line 1: Line 1:



This group is LOOKING, for all the world, to be a wicked scam on the public. This group is LOOKING, for all the world, to be a wicked scam on the public.
http://neer-do-well-hall-of-infamey.blogspot.ca/2013/11/on-trail-of-utter-scumbags-kleargear.html http://neer-do-well-hall-of-infamey.blogspot.ca/2013/11/on-trail-of-utter-scumbags-kleargear.html
Line 5: Line 8:


:: Cool down. Blogs are generally never used as reliable reference/source for many reasons, but there's been significant coverage about this case on other more credible websites, so you could use those instead. ] (]) 14:31, 20 November 2013 (UTC) :: Cool down. Blogs are generally never used as reliable reference/source for many reasons, but there's been significant coverage about this case on other more credible websites, so you could use those instead. ] (]) 14:31, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

"Cool Down" are you kidding me? I spent the better part of half an hour posting fully referenced material and it '''ALL''' gets deleted by a no-life, who apparently has nothing better to do than delete material off Wiki within seconds of it's posting. Now the dope wants the entire page removed?

This is a CRIME against the public ... a very obvious scam that is ripping people off right this second. What possible use is Wiki if complete retards control content that bloody damn well SHOULD be available to the public?

Revision as of 20:44, 20 November 2013


This group is LOOKING, for all the world, to be a wicked scam on the public. http://neer-do-well-hall-of-infamey.blogspot.ca/2013/11/on-trail-of-utter-scumbags-kleargear.html

It is HIGHLY improper for well researched, referenced, and absolutely true material to be removed. OF COURSE the legal ownership is highly relevant, along with every other FACT that MIGHT protect the public from getting conned by a very obvious crook. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.19.182.114 (talk) 04:13, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Cool down. Blogs are generally never used as reliable reference/source for many reasons, but there's been significant coverage about this case on other more credible websites, so you could use those instead. Zhanzhao (talk) 14:31, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

"Cool Down" are you kidding me? I spent the better part of half an hour posting fully referenced material and it ALL gets deleted by a no-life, who apparently has nothing better to do than delete material off Wiki within seconds of it's posting. Now the dope wants the entire page removed?

This is a CRIME against the public ... a very obvious scam that is ripping people off right this second. What possible use is Wiki if complete retards control content that bloody damn well SHOULD be available to the public?

Talk:Palmer v. Kleargear.com: Difference between revisions Add topic