| Revision as of 23:27, 1 January 2014 editDaniel Case (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators225,809 edits →December 2013: what a sock must do to get unblock← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:27, 2 January 2014 edit undoDarkknight68 (talk | contribs)14 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
| When sockpuppets/masters request unblock as you have, we usually ask that a) you pick one account and stick to it, and say so; and b) that you disclose all socks you created, whether we knew about them or not. Are you willing to do this? ] (]) 23:27, 1 January 2014 (UTC) | When sockpuppets/masters request unblock as you have, we usually ask that a) you pick one account and stick to it, and say so; and b) that you disclose all socks you created, whether we knew about them or not. Are you willing to do this? ] (]) 23:27, 1 January 2014 (UTC) | ||
| I am willing to do so and stick with ]. And yes, my original account is Safwwefe, and everyone in suspected and confirmed socks categories of Safwwefe are my socks, along with everyone mentioned in Safwwefe's sockpuppet investigation. | |||
| ==Blocked== | ==Blocked== | ||
| This account has been blocked indefinitely for sockpuppetry per the findings of ]. ] (]) 00:11, 1 January 2014 (UTC) | This account has been blocked indefinitely for sockpuppetry per the findings of ]. ] (]) 00:11, 1 January 2014 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 02:27, 2 January 2014
Your use of multiple Misplaced Pages accounts
Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Misplaced Pages account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Safwwefe, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Misplaced Pages administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Misplaced Pages policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Misplaced Pages community.
HangingCurve 20:31, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
December 2013
Hello, I'm K6ka. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to User:HangingCurve, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. K6ka (talk | contrib) 20:33, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages, as you did at User talk:HangingCurve with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. K6ka (talk | contrib) 20:34, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Darkknight68 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am deeply sorry for the disruption I've caused. I would especially like to apologize to HangingCurve. Before I was blocked, I already apologized to him on his talk. I will never be mean to him or any other user on Misplaced Pages again. I will make productive edits, such as to sport articles, when I'm unblocked. Happy new years, and I really mean it this time. Darkknight68 (talk) 22:20, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Super. This has nothing to do with the reason for your original block and ban. Please use your primary account and stop posting these unblock requests with your socks. Kuru (talk) 22:44, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Darkknight68 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I cannot make an unblock request on my primary account as there is a block setting that prevents me from doing so. Of course, I am deeply sorry for my inappropriate edit to the Barack Obama page over 4 years ago, and I have not done something like that since and never will. Darkknight68 (talk) 22:54, 1 January 2014 (UTC)Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I cannot make an unblock request on my primary account as there is a block setting that prevents me from doing so. Of course, I am deeply sorry for my inappropriate edit to the Barack Obama page over 4 years ago, and I have not done something like that since and never will. ] (]) 22:54, 1 January 2014 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=I cannot make an unblock request on my primary account as there is a block setting that prevents me from doing so. Of course, I am deeply sorry for my inappropriate edit to the Barack Obama page over 4 years ago, and I have not done something like that since and never will. ] (]) 22:54, 1 January 2014 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=I cannot make an unblock request on my primary account as there is a block setting that prevents me from doing so. Of course, I am deeply sorry for my inappropriate edit to the Barack Obama page over 4 years ago, and I have not done something like that since and never will. ] (]) 22:54, 1 January 2014 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
When sockpuppets/masters request unblock as you have, we usually ask that a) you pick one account and stick to it, and say so; and b) that you disclose all socks you created, whether we knew about them or not. Are you willing to do this? Daniel Case (talk) 23:27, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
I am willing to do so and stick with Safwwefe. And yes, my original account is Safwwefe, and everyone in suspected and confirmed socks categories of Safwwefe are my socks, along with everyone mentioned in Safwwefe's sockpuppet investigation.
Blocked
This account has been blocked indefinitely for sockpuppetry per the findings of Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Safwwefe. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:11, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
Category: