| Revision as of 15:20, 21 February 2014 editWoodensuperman (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers87,504 edits →Template:Bibliographies of film directors← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:21, 21 February 2014 edit undoDr. Blofeld (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors636,344 edits →Template:Bibliographies of film directorsNext edit → | ||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
| '''Keep''' Bad faith nom. It's intended to be constructive and I'm sure others here would agree with me.♦ ] 15:16, 21 February 2014 (UTC) | '''Keep''' Bad faith nom. It's intended to be constructive and I'm sure others here would agree with me.♦ ] 15:16, 21 February 2014 (UTC) | ||
| :Not at all bad faith. It's just too broad a topic for a navbox. We don't have {{tl|Filmographies of film directors}} or {{tl|Bibliographies of authors}} for the same reason. Or {{tl|Biopics about composers}}, etc, etc. Perfectly acceptable for a category, but not a suitable navbox subject. --] (]) 15:19, 21 February 2014 (UTC) | :Not at all bad faith. It's just too broad a topic for a navbox. We don't have {{tl|Filmographies of film directors}} or {{tl|Bibliographies of authors}} for the same reason. Or {{tl|Biopics about composers}}, etc, etc. Perfectly acceptable for a category, but not a suitable navbox subject. --] (]) 15:19, 21 February 2014 (UTC) | ||
| ::How is it too broad?? It's intended as a nav guide for quick reference on books about film directors for people looking for books on them. Its ''convenient'', that's the whole point of navboxes, otherwise you could argue they're all redundant because of categories. Half an hour in and you're already being a meddlesome little turd.♦ ] 15:21, 21 February 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ==== ] ==== | ==== ] ==== | ||
Revision as of 15:21, 21 February 2014
| < February 20 | February 22 > |
|---|
February 21
Template:Bibliographies of film directors
Not a suitable topic for a navbox. Fails all of the five points at Misplaced Pages:Categories, lists, and navigation templates#Navigation templates, and is better suited to a category. --Rob Sinden (talk) 15:11, 21 February 2014 (UTC) Rob Sinden (talk) 15:11, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
Keep Bad faith nom. It's intended to be constructive and I'm sure others here would agree with me.♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:16, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
- Not at all bad faith. It's just too broad a topic for a navbox. We don't have {{Filmographies of film directors}} or {{Bibliographies of authors}} for the same reason. Or {{Biopics about composers}}, etc, etc. Perfectly acceptable for a category, but not a suitable navbox subject. --Rob Sinden (talk) 15:19, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
- How is it too broad?? It's intended as a nav guide for quick reference on books about film directors for people looking for books on them. Its convenient, that's the whole point of navboxes, otherwise you could argue they're all redundant because of categories. Half an hour in and you're already being a meddlesome little turd.♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:21, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
Template:Assassin's Creed chronology
per WP:VG/MOS and WP:GAMECRUFT: in-universe information on how the series are chronologically set. Nothing that can't be explained in the main article of Assassin's Creed. Soetermans. T / C 14:19, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
- delete per nom as redundant to Template:Assassin's Creed. if the chronology is important, it should be in a section in the article, not in a sidebar. Frietjes (talk) 14:26, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
- delete and add that with the two concurrent "presents" the game uses , the idea of a chronological order gets lost really fast. --MASEM (t) 15:07, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
Template:Armenian cuisine
- Template:Armenian cuisine (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Cuisine of Armenia (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Propose merging Template:Armenian cuisine with Template:Cuisine of Armenia.
No big difference Kareyac (talk) 13:59, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
- merge, keeping the horizontal navbox footer version. Frietjes (talk) 14:25, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
Template:Infobox material
Only two transclusions. Redundant? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:46, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
- keep, it's not redundant to anything, or I would not have created it. far better than the alternative. Frietjes (talk) 14:24, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
Template:Infobox stable isotope
Only six transclusions, Appears to be a copy of {{Infobox isotope}}. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:40, 21 February 2014 (UTC)|1=Infobox stable isotope}}
Template:Infobox siren
- Template:Infobox siren (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Only two transclusions Undocumented. Redundant to more generic infoboxes, such as {{Infobox product}}. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:33, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
Template:TAPPS 5A
- Template:TAPPS 5A (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Fails WP:NENAN, for not having enough relevant and valid links. The Banner talk 12:24, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
Template:Http:gwhsaa.com/st-jimmo.com
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Speedy delete. Test page, deleted under G2. Yunshui 雲水 14:34, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
Possibly a mistake in creation as editing tests; if not a mistake the user is trying to use it to link externally against guidelines.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 11:50, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Template:Centred gallery
- Template:Centred gallery (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
This appears entirely useless: <center><gallery>pictures</gallery></center> seems to do the same thing. meteor_sandwich_yum (talk) 07:57, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
- delete as redundant to {{gallery}}. Frietjes (talk) 14:29, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete; since this template was written, both the
<gallery>...</gallery>tag and the{{gallery}}template have been improved to handle centring. In the former case, this should be done using<gallery class=center>...</gallery>because the<center>...</center>element is obsolete. In the latter case, the|align=centerparameter is provided. --Redrose64 (talk) 14:38, 21 February 2014 (UTC)