User talk:Renamed user e8LqRIqjJf2zlGDYPSu1aXoc: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 03:05, 27 March 2014 editLfdder (talk \| contribs)14,867 edits →Following me ← Previous edit		Revision as of 03:14, 27 March 2014 edit undoRenamed user e8LqRIqjJf2zlGDYPSu1aXoc (talk \| contribs)37,368 edits →Following me: responseNext edit →
Line 32:		Line 32:
	{{od\|:::::::::}}		{{od\|:::::::::}}
	Wouldn't talking to me have worked better? (And I mean ''talking'' -- not blasting me with warning templates.) It seems pretty obvious to me that people generally respond poorly to being pushed around and being made a lesson out of or whatnot. They're aggravated by how they've been treated and give little thought to their own actions. Similarly, labelling me a 'behavioural issue' is rather poor form. It shows lack of understanding (or lack of willingless to understand) -- say, much like when people edit war. — ] (]) 03:05, 27 March 2014 (UTC)		Wouldn't talking to me have worked better? (And I mean ''talking'' -- not blasting me with warning templates.) It seems pretty obvious to me that people generally respond poorly to being pushed around and being made a lesson out of or whatnot. They're aggravated by how they've been treated and give little thought to their own actions. Similarly, labelling me a 'behavioural issue' is rather poor form. It shows lack of understanding (or lack of willingless to understand) -- say, much like when people edit war. — ] (]) 03:05, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
			:If you disagree with the use of user warning templates, you may wish to bring it up at ], or the ]. You made it clear by your behavior that you were not going to cease edit warring in the future without administrator intervention. I believe I followed a reasonable course of action and stand by it. —/]/<sup><small>]</small></sup>/<sub><small>]</small></sub>/ 03:14, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

	== A barnstar for you! ==		== A barnstar for you! ==

Revision as of 03:14, 27 March 2014

Notice: threads on this page are automatically archived after 10 days of inactivity.

This is Renamed user e8LqRIqjJf2zlGDYPSu1aXoc's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Misplaced Pages? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22Auto-archiving period: 10 days

Vandalism
Level 4

My signature

You told me to fix it, and I did. (You were right, signatures should not be inconsiderate). Want to see? ChromaNebula (talk) 22:13, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Reads fine to me! Sorry to nitpick on that since I immediately got and liked the concept of your prior sig. —/Mendaliv//_Δ's/ 01:49, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Following me

Should I assume that you're following me? Bit of a funny coincidence to be pestered out of the blue, be reported for edit warring in an unrelated occurrence and in an area you never seem to have tread before, and now to comment in an AfD I've participated in such a short period of time when we've never met before. — Lfdder (talk) 22:31, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

I routinely watchlist the user talk pages of individuals who show up at EAR for behavioral issues. If you consider this inappropriate, I suggest you seek the intervention of a third party, such as an administrator. —/Mendaliv//_Δ's/ 01:51, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

When did I appear at this 'EAR'? — Lfdder (talk) 02:17, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

WP:EAR#Problems with article and editor. —/Mendaliv//_Δ's/ 02:19, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Right. Well, I think that's the most condescending thing I've been told in quite some time. Why exactly are you following people with 'behavioral issues', though? — Lfdder (talk) 02:30, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

In this particular instance, your user talk page was watchlisted automatically when I used Twinkle to warn you for violating 3RR. —/Mendaliv//_Δ's/ 02:35, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

What is it that you hoped to achieve by reporting me nearly 12 hours after the edit war was over? — Lfdder (talk) 02:38, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Given you had been warned less than one week prior for a 3RR violation that should have resulted in a block, and you have been around for many years (and warned and blocked previously for edit warring), it seemed clear administrative action was needed. —/Mendaliv//_Δ's/ 02:41, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Well, why was it needed? What was it meant to achieve? — Lfdder (talk) 02:46, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

To stop your persistent edit warring. —/Mendaliv//_Δ's/ 02:49, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Wouldn't talking to me have worked better? (And I mean talking -- not blasting me with warning templates.) It seems pretty obvious to me that people generally respond poorly to being pushed around and being made a lesson out of or whatnot. They're aggravated by how they've been treated and give little thought to their own actions. Similarly, labelling me a 'behavioural issue' is rather poor form. It shows lack of understanding (or lack of willingless to understand) -- say, much like when people edit war. — Lfdder (talk) 03:05, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

If you disagree with the use of user warning templates, you may wish to bring it up at WT:UW, or the village pump. You made it clear by your behavior that you were not going to cease edit warring in the future without administrator intervention. I believe I followed a reasonable course of action and stand by it. —/Mendaliv//_Δ's/ 03:14, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Brilliant Idea Barnstar
	For telling me to fix my signature! ChromaNebula (talk) 00:02, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Thanks very much! —/Mendaliv//_Δ's/ 01:47, 27 March 2014 (UTC)