| Revision as of 22:46, 6 June 2014 editScotXW (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users14,417 edits Sandboxed Applications for GNOME/Linux← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:42, 16 June 2014 edit undoShaddim (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users12,269 edits recovering the unexplained removed but sourced positions (without the excessive quotes)Next edit → | ||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
| A medium term goal that Lennart is working on seems to be "Sandboxed Applications for GNOME/Linux".<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/GNOME-developers-plan-Linux-apps-1798691.html |title=GNOME developers plan "Linux apps" |work=] |date=2013-02-06}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://0pointer.de/public/gnome-asia-2013-apps.pdf |title=Sandboxed Applications for GNOME |format=pdf |date=2013-05-24}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://lwn.net/Articles/562138/ |title=Apps for GNOME desktops |work=] |date=2013-08-07}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://wiki.gnome.org/Design/OS/Sandboxing |title=GNOME Wiki: Sandboxing}}</ref> | A medium term goal that Lennart is working on seems to be "Sandboxed Applications for GNOME/Linux".<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/GNOME-developers-plan-Linux-apps-1798691.html |title=GNOME developers plan "Linux apps" |work=] |date=2013-02-06}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://0pointer.de/public/gnome-asia-2013-apps.pdf |title=Sandboxed Applications for GNOME |format=pdf |date=2013-05-24}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://lwn.net/Articles/562138/ |title=Apps for GNOME desktops |work=] |date=2013-08-07}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://wiki.gnome.org/Design/OS/Sandboxing |title=GNOME Wiki: Sandboxing}}</ref> | ||
| == Controversies == | |||
| Poettering is known for having controversial technical and architectural positions regarding the linux ecosystem.<ref name=fosdem2/><ref name=fosdem1/><ref name="linuxfr"/> | |||
| For instance, Poettering, who is the main developer of ], praised the Windows and MacOS audio stacks as "more advanced".<ref name="linuxfr">{{cite web|url=http://linuxfr.org/nodes/86687/comments/1249943 |title=Un entretien avec Lennart Poettering) |date=2011-07-06 |accessdate=2013-01-26 |quote=''Both Windows and MacOS have much better integrated audio stacks than we have. We have a couple of unique features they can't match, like networking support, lower latency behavior, or float-less audio pipelines, but in general the CoreAudio stack is definitely more advanced than ours. The distance, however, is much smaller than it used to be. The Windows stack is much less suitable as a benchmark, and we are matching its features much better than ]'s, but there's no doubt that it is probably still a better integrated audio hacking experience to develop for Windows.''}}</ref> | |||
| On the question, why the ] hasn’t been adopted by the mainstream users yet, Poettering voiced the opinion that "linux is to fragmented and needs to be streamlined to a platform",<ref name="linuxfr2">{{cite web|url=http://linuxfr.org/nodes/86687/comments/1249943 |title=Un entretien avec Lennart Poettering) |date=2011-07-06 |accessdate=2013-01-26|quote=''I think we weren't innovative enough in the interface, and we didn't have a convincing message and clear platform. If you accept MacOS as benchmark for user interfaces, then we weren't really matching it, at best copying it. I think this is changing now, with GNOME 3 which is a big step forward as an interface for Linux and for the first time is something that has been strictly designed under ]. So we now have a better interface, leaves the message and the clear platform. Linux is still too fragmented, and a developer targeting Linux will have to choose from a variety of APIs, a bazaar of somewhat matching but mostly just chaotic choices that will work on some systems but not on others. I think it would be in our greatest interest to streamline the platform top to bottom, and thus have a clear message what the Linux OS is. And of course, I believe my work in cleaning up the lower levels of our userspace stack is helping to work in that direction. Getting a clear message out what Linux is supposed to be is definitely a social issue, but to make that happen the Linux platform needs to be streamlined first, and that's a technical task, and not done yet.''}}</ref> which is similar to ]'s view. | |||
| Poettering has also advocated speeding up Linux development at the expense of breaking compatibility with the ].<ref>{{cite web |url=http://lwn.net/Articles/430598/ |title=Choosing between portability and innovation |date=2011-03-02}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://archive.fosdem.org/2011/interview/lennart-poettering |title=FOSDEM 2011 interview |date=2011-02-06|quote=''Not having to care about portability has two big advantages: we can make maximum use of what the modern Linux kernel offers these days without headaches -- Linux is one of the most powerful kernels in existence, but many of its features have not been used by the previous solutions. And secondly, it greatly simplifies our code and makes it shorter: since we never need to abstract OS interfaces the amount of glue code is minimal, and hence what we gain is a smaller chance to create bugs, a smaller chance of confusing the reader of the code (hence better maintainability) and a smaller footprint.''}}</ref> Poettering took this decision because of his experience in writing some other low-level components in the desktop stack.<ref name=fosdem2>{{cite web|url=https://archive.fosdem.org/2011/interview/lennart-poettering |publisher=fosdem.org |title=Interview: Lennart Poettering - Lennart Poettering will give a talk about "Systemd: beyond init" at FOSDEM 2011. |year=2011 |accessdate=2014-06-16 |quote=''Many of my previous projects (including PulseAudio and Avahi) have been written to be portable. Being relieved from the chains that the requirement for portability puts on you is quite liberating. While ensuring portability when working on high-level applications is not necessarily a difficult job it becomes increasingly more difficult if the stuff you work on is a system component (which systemd, PulseAudio and Avahi are).''}}</ref> | |||
| He even goes further with this provocative invitation to other developers to do the same.<ref name=fosdem1>{{cite web|url=https://archive.fosdem.org/2011/interview/lennart-poettering|publisher=fosdem.org|title=Interview: Lennart Poettering - Lennart Poettering will give a talk about "Systemd: beyond init" at FOSDEM 2011.|year=2011 |accessdate=2014-06-16 |quote=''In fact, the way I see things the ''']''' has been taking the role of the '''POSIX API''' and Linux is the focal point of all Free Software development. Due to that I can only recommend developers to try to hack with only Linux in mind and experience the freedom and the opportunities this offers you. So, get yourself a copy of ], ignore everything it says about ] compatibility and hack away your amazing Linux software. It's quite relieving!''}}</ref> | |||
| == References == | == References == | ||
Revision as of 18:42, 16 June 2014
 | This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)
|
| Lennart Poettering | |
|---|---|
 Poettering in December 2012 | |
| Born | Guatemala City |
| Nationality | German |
| Occupation | Software engineer |
| Employer | Red Hat |
| Known for | Avahi, PulseAudio, systemd |
| Website | 0pointer |
Lennart Poettering is a German computer programmer. He is best known for his work on free and open source software including PulseAudio, a sound server, the systemd replacement for the System V init daemon, and Avahi, an implementation of the zeroconf protocol for network device discovery.
Life and career
Poettering was born in Guatemala City but grew up in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, and Hamburg, Germany. Poettering currently works for Red Hat. Poettering is a long term contributor of the GNOME project, a GNOME Foundation member and a regular speaker at the GUADEC conference.
Lennart Poettering is a hobbyist photographer with a special interest in travel pictures, usually taken during extended trips near the conferences where he is invited. He has created a collection of more than a hundred stitched panoramas.
Since 2003, Poettering has worked in more than 40 software projects, mainly written in C and related to solution stacks in areas like multimedia (PulseAudio), networking, telephony and system startup (systemd) on Linux.
Poettering is a key developer of kdbus, a Linux kernel based reimplementation of D-Bus, a topic which was publicly presented, by himself, for the first time during Linux.conf.au 2014.
A medium term goal that Lennart is working on seems to be "Sandboxed Applications for GNOME/Linux".
Controversies
Poettering is known for having controversial technical and architectural positions regarding the linux ecosystem.
For instance, Poettering, who is the main developer of PulseAudio, praised the Windows and MacOS audio stacks as "more advanced".
On the question, why the Linux desktop hasn’t been adopted by the mainstream users yet, Poettering voiced the opinion that "linux is to fragmented and needs to be streamlined to a platform", which is similar to Ingo Molnár's view.
Poettering has also advocated speeding up Linux development at the expense of breaking compatibility with the BSDs. Poettering took this decision because of his experience in writing some other low-level components in the desktop stack. He even goes further with this provocative invitation to other developers to do the same.
References
- "LPC: Linux audio: it's a mess". Lwn.net. Archived from the original on 2009-10-18. Retrieved 2009-07-03.
- Michael Larabel (2010-08-23). "An Update On The SystemD System & Session Manager". Phoronix. Retrieved 2013-01-29.
- "Using Avahi The 'Right Way'", linux.conf.au 2007
- linux.conf.au profile
- 2011 FOSDEM interview
- "glib main loop".
- "GNOME 3.0 Is Out!".
- "GNOME Foundation Members". Retrieved 2013-01-26.
- http://0pointer.de/photos/
- http://0pointer.de/static/panoramas.cgi
- Personal Blog, retrieved 2013-01-26
- https://lca2014.linux.org.au/schedule/30120/view_talk?day=None
- "GNOME developers plan "Linux apps"". Heinz Heise. 2013-02-06.
- "Sandboxed Applications for GNOME" (pdf). 2013-05-24.
- "Apps for GNOME desktops". LWN.net. 2013-08-07.
- "GNOME Wiki: Sandboxing".
- ^ "Interview: Lennart Poettering - Lennart Poettering will give a talk about "Systemd: beyond init" at FOSDEM 2011". fosdem.org. 2011. Retrieved 2014-06-16.
Many of my previous projects (including PulseAudio and Avahi) have been written to be portable. Being relieved from the chains that the requirement for portability puts on you is quite liberating. While ensuring portability when working on high-level applications is not necessarily a difficult job it becomes increasingly more difficult if the stuff you work on is a system component (which systemd, PulseAudio and Avahi are).
- ^ "Interview: Lennart Poettering - Lennart Poettering will give a talk about "Systemd: beyond init" at FOSDEM 2011". fosdem.org. 2011. Retrieved 2014-06-16.
In fact, the way I see things the Linux API has been taking the role of the POSIX API and Linux is the focal point of all Free Software development. Due to that I can only recommend developers to try to hack with only Linux in mind and experience the freedom and the opportunities this offers you. So, get yourself a copy of The Linux Programming Interface, ignore everything it says about POSIX compatibility and hack away your amazing Linux software. It's quite relieving!
- ^ "Un entretien avec Lennart Poettering)". 2011-07-06. Retrieved 2013-01-26.
Both Windows and MacOS have much better integrated audio stacks than we have. We have a couple of unique features they can't match, like networking support, lower latency behavior, or float-less audio pipelines, but in general the CoreAudio stack is definitely more advanced than ours. The distance, however, is much smaller than it used to be. The Windows stack is much less suitable as a benchmark, and we are matching its features much better than CoreAudio's, but there's no doubt that it is probably still a better integrated audio hacking experience to develop for Windows.
- "Un entretien avec Lennart Poettering)". 2011-07-06. Retrieved 2013-01-26.
I think we weren't innovative enough in the interface, and we didn't have a convincing message and clear platform. If you accept MacOS as benchmark for user interfaces, then we weren't really matching it, at best copying it. I think this is changing now, with GNOME 3 which is a big step forward as an interface for Linux and for the first time is something that has been strictly designed under UI design guidelines. So we now have a better interface, leaves the message and the clear platform. Linux is still too fragmented, and a developer targeting Linux will have to choose from a variety of APIs, a bazaar of somewhat matching but mostly just chaotic choices that will work on some systems but not on others. I think it would be in our greatest interest to streamline the platform top to bottom, and thus have a clear message what the Linux OS is. And of course, I believe my work in cleaning up the lower levels of our userspace stack is helping to work in that direction. Getting a clear message out what Linux is supposed to be is definitely a social issue, but to make that happen the Linux platform needs to be streamlined first, and that's a technical task, and not done yet.
- "Choosing between portability and innovation". 2011-03-02.
- "FOSDEM 2011 interview". 2011-02-06.
Not having to care about portability has two big advantages: we can make maximum use of what the modern Linux kernel offers these days without headaches -- Linux is one of the most powerful kernels in existence, but many of its features have not been used by the previous solutions. And secondly, it greatly simplifies our code and makes it shorter: since we never need to abstract OS interfaces the amount of glue code is minimal, and hence what we gain is a smaller chance to create bugs, a smaller chance of confusing the reader of the code (hence better maintainability) and a smaller footprint.
External links
 | This biographical article relating to a computer specialist is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it. |