Revision as of 17:13, 25 June 2014 editSineBot (talk | contribs)Bots2,556,573 editsm Signing comment by 31.52.138.252 - "→shaleh: new section"← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:14, 25 June 2014 edit undoLeoFrank (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers33,830 edits Reverted to revision 614340238 by 82.132.216.222 (talk): Fuck off you vandal. (TW)Next edit → | ||
Line 89: | Line 89: | ||
:::Your explanation is not convincing. <span style="white-space:nowrap;">—] <sup>]</sup></span> 09:06, 25 June 2014 (UTC) | :::Your explanation is not convincing. <span style="white-space:nowrap;">—] <sup>]</sup></span> 09:06, 25 June 2014 (UTC) | ||
:::::What do you mean? ] (]) 09:10, 25 June 2014 (UTC) | :::::What do you mean? ] (]) 09:10, 25 June 2014 (UTC) | ||
== shaleh == | |||
shaleh bodmashka baccha. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 17:12, 25 June 2014 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
Revision as of 17:14, 25 June 2014
This is LeoFrank's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22Auto-archiving period: 10 days |
Archives |
This page has archives. Sections older than 10 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Need involvement
Please see this page about a debate on population of Tiruchirapalli. User_talk:Vensatry#Population — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vin09 (talk • contribs) 13:17, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Roll back
Unless I get familiarize with rollback, I don't want to have it. I have requested the concerned admin for a revoke of right, who granted me. If I get familiarize with it I'll take it in future. Also if I have it, bi mistake I may use it at wrong place. Thank you.--Vin09 (talk) 14:17, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
- @Vin09: I really appreciate your take on this. You are a good editor and I just don't want to see you getting blocked. It's very thoughtful that you would like to give it sometime and then re-apply for the permission. Good luck. Cheers! — LeoFrank 14:23, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
- WP:Twinkle can be a handy tool. —Vensatry (ping) 17:53, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
- @Vin09: Yes WP:TW is a handy tool. But be cautious when you are using the "Rollback (VANDAL)" option. Avoid using it; use the "Rollback" option instead. — LeoFrank 12:28, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
- ok, please tell me if we want to notify any IP user for an edit been undone, which one on that we have to select?--Vin09 (talk) 12:32, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
- @Vin09: It depends on the reason for your revert. If it fits any of the standard warning templates, then go ahead and give them a level1 warning, else you will have to explain in your own words why you did so. — LeoFrank 12:54, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
- ok, please tell me if we want to notify any IP user for an edit been undone, which one on that we have to select?--Vin09 (talk) 12:32, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
- @Vin09: Yes WP:TW is a handy tool. But be cautious when you are using the "Rollback (VANDAL)" option. Avoid using it; use the "Rollback" option instead. — LeoFrank 12:28, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
- WP:Twinkle can be a handy tool. —Vensatry (ping) 17:53, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Need help on page
The page Prakasam district at this section Prakasam_district#Temples has too many listings about temples, assembly constituencies. What needs to be done?--Vin09 (talk) 14:30, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
- Listing worship places unless they are very well-known is unenclyclopedic and needs to be removed. On the assembly constituencies thing, I'm not very familiar. @Vensatry: will be able to tell you. — LeoFrank 14:40, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Your rollback request
Hi LeoFrank, I've restored rollback to your account. Three years is more than enough time to wait to request rollback again after losing it; my only advice at this point is to take greater care than before, which I am sure you will. Best. Acalamari 21:00, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
- @Acalamari: Thank a lot. Sure I will take care. — LeoFrank 03:50, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar | |
Thanks for posting to WP:UAA. Bearian (talk) 17:16, 18 June 2014 (UTC) |
- @Bearian: Thanks, my pleasure :) — LeoFrank 04:06, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology (Singapore)
Hi,
May I have the permission to update the wiiki pedia page https://en.wikipedia.org/Institute_of_Molecular_and_Cell_Biology_%28Singapore%29
Thank you. Mcblab12 (talk) 07:37, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
- @Mcblab12: You may edit as long as your edits conform to some core wiki policies. From what I can see is that you have a conflict of interest with this article. Your edits should also conform to WP:NOT. — LeoFrank 07:50, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
I want to update this webpage to reflect the stump in this[REDACTED] entry on institute of molecular and cell biology (singapore) as similar in this webpage:
http://www.imcb.a-star.edu.sg/php/about.php
Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mcblab12 (talk • contribs) 08:57, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
- @Mcblab12: As mentioned earlier, you have a conflict of interest wrt the article. In such a situation, it's best not to edit the article to avoid all the complications. If the information is important, then some other editor will add it. I'd suggest you to edit some other article in your area of interest, but not Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology (Singapore). — LeoFrank 11:10, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: College of Commercial Arbitrators
Hello LeoFrank. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of College of Commercial Arbitrators, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Article has been edited since it was tagged and is no longer a copyvio. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz /Stalk 16:58, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
- @Malik Shabazz: Yes, the article looks better now :) — LeoFrank 17:30, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
Edit issue
Hi, Leo. I noticed you have undone a slightest edit on a page. Could you explain if anything conflicts with that, please? 46.241.159.165 (talk) 06:56, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
- Your edits contained original research and were also a violation of biographies of living persons. — LeoFrank 07:13, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
- Unless the data, you are reffering to, is unsourced, I prefer my edits, which are more adequate and popular. What's wrong in there? 46.241.159.165 (talk) 07:21, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
- You have been reverted my multiple editors, so you should have the clue that your addition is not accepted. About what is wrong with your edit, I have explained in my previous comment above. — LeoFrank 07:24, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
- Unless the data, you are reffering to, is unsourced, I prefer my edits, which are more adequate and popular. What's wrong in there? 46.241.159.165 (talk) 07:21, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
India Statistics Vandal
Got all three of them for six months. Thanks. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 13:08, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
- Cool. Thanks, — LeoFrank 13:59, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
Indo-European migrations
Looks like I've got a new fan. Best regards, Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 19:09, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
- @Joshua Jonathan: Congrats on your new fan. (JK) Cheers — LeoFrank 01:32, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
poverty in India
That article has become a POV mess and you know that a sock added all those odd sentences which were not even written correctly with the excuse of it being in 2010. Most of the data is 2013 I dont know why you insist on a socks POV. GaryKhanna (talk) 08:17, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
- @GaryKhanna: Being such a new user, and with edits only to Poverty in India, how is it that you are aware of sockpuppetry and the socks of the user? — LeoFrank 08:35, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
- I have an ip which I use all the time do a check user im clean I have followed Sudhir777 and his socks hes basically a nationalist pov pusher he removed all the valid sourced material from Independent organisations and added tabloids I understand if you are also offended by the true poverty figures of your country but we should not hide the truth under false lies. 82.132.216.222 (talk) 08:42, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
- Your explanation is not convincing. — LeoFrank 09:06, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
- What do you mean? 82.132.216.222 (talk) 09:10, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
- Your explanation is not convincing. — LeoFrank 09:06, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
- I have an ip which I use all the time do a check user im clean I have followed Sudhir777 and his socks hes basically a nationalist pov pusher he removed all the valid sourced material from Independent organisations and added tabloids I understand if you are also offended by the true poverty figures of your country but we should not hide the truth under false lies. 82.132.216.222 (talk) 08:42, 25 June 2014 (UTC)