Revision as of 20:21, 29 May 2014 editLegobot (talk | contribs)Bots1,671,924 editsm Transcluding GA review← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:37, 30 June 2014 edit undoJamesx12345 (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers28,014 edits GA passNext edit → | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProject Professional sound production|class= |
{{WikiProject Professional sound production|class=GA|importance=mid}} | ||
{{WikiProject Electronics|class= |
{{WikiProject Electronics|class=GA|importance=low}} | ||
{{WikiProject BBC|class= |
{{WikiProject BBC|class=|class=GA|importance=mid}} | ||
{{dyktalk|6 January|2014|entry= ... that up to 100,000 pairs of the BBC's ''']''' loudspeaker ''(pictured)'' have been put into circulation during its two-decade-plus production period?}} | {{dyktalk|6 January|2014|entry= ... that up to 100,000 pairs of the BBC's ''']''' loudspeaker ''(pictured)'' have been put into circulation during its two-decade-plus production period?}} | ||
{{GA|21:37, 30 June 2014 (UTC)|topic=Computing and engineering|page=1}} | |||
{{GA nominee|08:02, 7 February 2014 (UTC)|nominator=<small><span style="background-color:#ffffff;border: 1px solid;">]</span></small>]|page=1|subtopic=Computing and engineering|status=onreview|note=}} | |||
{{Talk:LS3/5A/GA1}} | {{Talk:LS3/5A/GA1}} |
Revision as of 21:37, 30 June 2014
Professional sound production GA‑class Mid‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Electronics GA‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
BBC GA‑class Mid‑importance | |||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from LS3/5A appeared on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the Did you know column on 6 January 2014 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
LS3/5A has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: June 30, 2014. |
GA Review
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:LS3/5A/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Jamesx12345 (talk · contribs) 20:08, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
I'll take this one on, having seen it languish far too long. James12345 20:08, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
- Note: my responses indented:
- "as opposed to the "LS5" loudspeaker, intended for studio monitoring" - does "studio monitoring" here mean an indoors studio?
- yes, proper studio environment
- "using headphones is unsatisfactory" - is there a straightforward reason for this?
- none was cited, but then listening through speakers and through headphones isn't the same experience at all.
- "There were no commercial constraints." - does that mean that they didn't design it to be sold, and so there was no emphasis on "features"?
- Yes. It was primarily for own use, and the Beeb, being the Beeb, didn't care about cost required to achieve the necessary quality. £100k is quite a large sum of money to be spent on development in the early seventies
- "built using the" - mention that these are drive units.
- added.
- "had initiated tendering" - odd use of past tense - relative to what?
- The follow-on is that the spec had to be changed in mid process. -- Ohc 02:52, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
Sorry for the delay in this part of the review. James12345 19:32, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
- "Its internal walls are heavily damped, only specific speaker..." - already mentioned.
- "The name was..." - it isn't immediately clear that the name is Rogers.
- "Spendor's production amounted..." - the other produces could be introduced better.
- "and became easier to drive" - redundant to decrease in resistance.
- "matched by computer." - not very precise. "matched to each other by computer testing" or something is a bit clearer.
- The Legacy section is a bit odd. The source mentions the LS3 a few times, but I don't really see the connection
- Will this come to anything?
- Note 1 is a bit confusing. A note on what the year means (first manufactured?) would help.
- Just pinging Ohconfucius (talk · contribs) you to let you know there are still a few things to be done. James12345 13:46, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
- @Jamesx12345:I have now tried to clarify the points raised. Further comments welcome. -- Ohc 03:41, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
- Sorry for the delay. Looks fine now. Thanks, James12345 21:36, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
- GA-Class Professional sound production articles
- Mid-importance Professional sound production articles
- WikiProject Professional sound production articles
- GA-Class electronic articles
- Low-importance electronic articles
- WikiProject Electronics articles
- GA-Class BBC articles
- Mid-importance BBC articles
- WikiProject BBC articles
- Misplaced Pages Did you know articles
- Misplaced Pages good articles
- Engineering and technology good articles