Revision as of 15:48, 30 June 2006 editDreadstar (talk | contribs)53,180 editsm →Consensus vote on sources for ND: clarify← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:03, 1 July 2006 edit undoAskolnick (talk | contribs)1,740 editsm →Consensus vote on sources for ND: needs to be held accountableNext edit → | ||
Line 538: | Line 538: | ||
::My other question is whether I can use information from a link that's no longer available. It looks like I can as long as I give an access date ] for the information. This is for the trip to Japan, the info used to be on Natasha's website, but now I can't find it. I downloaded it, so I have the actual copy - which is more or less what Pravda.RU said about the trip. I still think we can include comments from Pravda.RU according to ] - although the wording of that article was fluctuating until it was protected. ] 15:47, 30 June 2006 (UTC) | ::My other question is whether I can use information from a link that's no longer available. It looks like I can as long as I give an access date ] for the information. This is for the trip to Japan, the info used to be on Natasha's website, but now I can't find it. I downloaded it, so I have the actual copy - which is more or less what Pravda.RU said about the trip. I still think we can include comments from Pravda.RU according to ] - although the wording of that article was fluctuating until it was protected. ] 15:47, 30 June 2006 (UTC) | ||
I believe everyone should be held accountable for their actions and their statements. That's why I'm posting here the outrageously false statement Keith Tyler recently made in his campaign to use one of the world's sleaziest news tabloids as a source of information supporting paranormal belief in Wiki's ] article. | |||
A few days ago, he voted in favor of using information from Pravda.Ru and falsely claimed: | |||
:"In fact, no one has presented any evidence why Pravda.Ru is any less reliable than, say, People Magazine or the Washington Times. The only reasons presented against its use are undefended accusations of its character. We aren't talking Weekly World News here. - Keith D. Tyler" | |||
That is such an whopper of a falsehood, considering how other editors and I repeatedly pointed out to him just how sleazy Pravda RU is. It only takes a pair of eyes and honest intent to see this. For example, these are just from TODAY's "science" news headlines: | |||
:"Humans to decipher the DNA of God and clone another Christ" | |||
:"Men with biggest reproductive organs all live in England" | |||
:"KGB ran secret laboratories to study extraterrestrial civilizations" | |||
:"US forces to attack heterosexual soldiers with homosexual bombs" | |||
:"Aliens probably build their bases on Earth’s seabed disturbing submarines" | |||
:"U.S. scientist says scores of UFOs fly around the Sun" | |||
:"Dragons came down to Earth from Sirius to share their wisdom with humans" | |||
:"Mankind descended from civilization of Atlanteans in the Arctic" | |||
:"Blind Russian mystic discerns colors by touch" | |||
"We aren't talking Weekly World News," Tyler argued. Right. We're talking Pravda RU -- which regularly stoops far lower in the journalistic gutter than the Weekly World News ever does. Yet Tyler continues to defend Pravda RU's reputation in his campaign to use the sleazy tabloid as a source of information for the ] article. People who come here to learn about Keith Tyler's editing record should know this.] 20:03, 1 July 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:03, 1 July 2006
Archives: 1 2 See also topical archives inline.
Aqua Teens and Kidwriter
I know that the Mooninites came from Kidwriter, but you're right, it is unsubstaniated until I find some proof. If I can ever find some, i'll put it back in, but for now, the current entry is accurate enough for me, they do look Atari-esque, everything looked that way in computers back in the early 80s.
Comment added by User:Karmafist on 09:29, July 16, 2005
Deadend Pages
I saw your comment on VFD about the detritus on Deadend Pages. I thought you were exaggerating, so I went to look for myself. You were being kind. I am agog. I am aghast. Joyous 01:59, Sep 21, 2004 (UTC)
Handoff
Seeing your changes in my edit really made me believe in the power of wikipedia. Good stuff! niklas_a Oct. 13, 21:59:27 UTC
John Hancock buildings
See /John Hancock.
(Michael Moore and bacon)
"Even if Michael Moore does like canadian bacon, this detail is not encyclopedic" is the best comment i've ever seen on a talk page. In fact, I think the basic ideas of Misplaced Pages are pretty much summed up right there. - Bgruber 01:55, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Micronations, etc.
For non-current comments on micronations, GenePoole, Centauri, or Samboy, etc., see /Micronations.
Image:Amiri Baraka.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Amiri Baraka.jpg. I couldn't find any license grant for this image on the source you gave. Am I missing something? --Ellmist 02:17, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
I don't know it. It is from the pictures section of amiribaraka.com; there is no copyright notice anywhere in that site, and my assessment of that photo page is that they are there with the expectation that people will use them. I don't really have a more solid defense than that, but it seems like one of the better cases of the fair use argument.
I will inquire of the webmaster there for clarification.
- Keith D. Tyler ¶ 04:05, Mar 13, 2005 (UTC)
Image:601 Congress Street Manulife Construction.jpg
Image deletion warning | The image Image:601 Congress Street Manulife Construction.jpg has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Possibly unfree images. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it will be deleted. If you have any information on the source or licensing of this image, please go there to provide the necessary information. |
Burgundavia (✈ take a flight?) 16:47, May 28, 2005 (UTC)
- Don't worry, you have until June 29 before the image gets yanked. As for suitablity, I don't think that this is free, but I can swayed. Burgundavia (✈ take a flight?) 03:04, May 30, 2005 (UTC)
- No copyright information means that it is copyrighted, and thus unsuitable for use on Misplaced Pages. Burgundavia (✈ take a flight?) 06:14, Jun 1, 2005 (UTC)
The Micronation article
Since you defended George Cruickshank during my arbitration against him last year, I would like to bring to your attention his recent alledged actions. There is strong evidence that the account User:Centauri is a sockpuppet of his. See this page for more evidence.
Recently, User:Centauri has been rather vigilant about linking to Empire of Atlantium from the micronation article:
This, despite the fact that he is the only user who wants this particular content in the Micronation article:
I am requesting that you look at this article and make up your own mind how to handle this content dispute (the fact that Wik may be back just fuels flames to the fire). Samboy 04:05, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
- Thank you for your input. Samboy 19:31, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
- Yes, I would appreciate it if you looked at the matter too.
- This is text that I am trying to include:
- A "summit of micronations" hosted as part of the exhibition was attended by representatives of Sealand, Elgaland-Vargaland, New Utopia, Atlantium, Frestonia and Fusa, and will feature in a 5-part BBC television documentary about micronations produced by Danny Wallace and scheduled to screen in the United Kingdom commencing in July 2005. The exhibition is also being reprised at the Andrew Kreps Gallery in New York City from 24 June - 29 July 2005.
- The section in bold (which has this reference to suppoort it, is what Samboy is creating a song-and-dance about, going so far as provoke an edit war on the subject with an editor who I and many others are reasonably certain is a sockpuppet of Gzornenplatz, who has of course been forbidden to edit anything, by Jimbo.
- It should be pointed out that the paragraph directly above, causes Samboy no issues at all:
- In August 2003 a summit of micronations took place in Helsinki at Finlandia Hall, the site of the Conference for Security and Co-operation in Europe (CSCE). The summit was attended by delegations of the Principality of Sealand, the Kingdoms of Elgaland & Vargaland, NSK-State in Time, Ladonia, Transnational Republic, the State of Sabotage and by scholars from various academic institutions.
- Both paragraphs describe events that are of international significance as far as micronations go, and I think it's important to list the participants. The fact that Samboy is so cut up over one of them, while completely ignoring the other one, shows that his judgement on the issue is severely impaired, being affected by personal disagreements he has had with other editors in the past.
- I'd also ask you to compare the edit history of myself and Samboy on this article. It shows that Samboy has not added a single word to the article, while I have contributed a significant amount of work to improving both the article's written content and formatting. This shows that Samboy's claims about "advertising" by me are rubbish. --Centauri 04:55, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
- Thanks for injecting some sound reasoning into this discussion. --Centauri 06:34, 16 July 2005 (UTC)
I know you don't like dealing with this article, but I have just put up a poll on Talk:Micronation to try and come up with a reasonable consensus. Samboy 07:58, 16 July 2005 (UTC)
Google Moon
I am not against the merge. It was a redirect to Google Earth but the article wrote nothing about Google Moon so I created a stub for that. SYSS Mouse 01:22, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
Human Rights Servey on Misplaced Pages (The final post of I_sterbinski)
- Dear all,
- Misplaced Pages was recently a subject of intensive research of an huge international human right organization. A team of people from different nationalities and ages were acting on Misplaced Pages for 20 days, investigating previously noted anomalities of Misplaced Pages free editing and forming a final report, which (between the others similar reports) will later be a guide to all future moves of the organization concerning Misplaced Pages. Acting under an account of a real person, their privacy is to be held private. Therefore, very few private information will be revealed.
- Also, this is a result of the lack of final possition of the organization concerning Misplaced Pages and human rights, which was still not formed.
- The team's final post on Misplaced Pages, where they explain their actions can be found on the following addresses:
- http://en.wikipedia.org/User:I_sterbinski
- http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Macedonia#Human_Rights_Servey_on_Wikipedia_.28The_final_post_of_I_sterbinski.29
- The team would like to thank to all the persons who took part in the correspondence with us.
- We also want to appologise for keeping our identity secret for a longer period.
- Best regards,
- Aleksandar, Biljana, Asparuh, Christos, Valjon, Michael and Ana Luiza
- I sterbinski 01:32, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
Regarding the quote at the Sam Houston high school discussion page
This was posted awhile ago, but I wanted to tell you something related to it:
"Weak keep -- there's this bit on the high school's page that, if expanded upon, might lend the school some notability IMO: Sam Houston has Texas' oldest high school newspaper, the Aegis, started in 1889. In addition, the world's first girls' Military Drill Squad, formerly known as the Black Battalion, but now called the Tigerettes, originated at our school. It's not much, but it's something. - KeithTyler 17:25, Oct 5, 2004 (UTC) But nobody wants to do that work -- they just want to have tens of thousands of high school articles that have nothing different between them and no potential for notability. Lazy, cowardly, and presumptuous. - 19:22, Oct 8, 2004 (UTC)"
I didn't realize that the information was on that website! After I saw that post, I added that stuff to the article. Thank you! WhisperToMe 19:17, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
Micronations
Thanks for the heads-up on micronations. My contribution was just a drive-by. I'll be OK. --SV Resolution(Talk) 00:12, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
CED
I have re-written my article on the ced videodisc, and would like you to reconsider keeping it. Also, just wanted say the facts on the marketing faliure of the disc were fairly accurate, since the format was largely unsuccesful with North America, although it did take off in Japan.Oliverdl 01:26, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
Just asking, is Selectavision the same as CED Videodisc?Oliverdl 07:45, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
I want to say that I got my information from a book, which called the Selectavision the "CED Videodisc", giving no mention of the former. Also, a google search brought up the Selectavision page, which had nothing about the CED Videodisc, as well as a page to buy CED Videodisc labels, which made no connection to the fact that CED Videodiscs were the same as Selectavision discs. And finally, the grammar and typing (not spelling) errors were very minor, due to my re-writing the page very quickly, but you made it seem like it was illiterate. The entire tone of your response on my talk page did not conform to wikiquette, which expects courteous and constructive comments from contributors, and you did not follow the proper guidelines when you put the page up for deletion. I am still fairly new to wikipedia, and it would be nice if people with more experience like you could be more helpful and constructive.-Oliverdl 21:25, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
Assistance with banned troll
If you could take a look at Sealand and Empire of Atlantium and assist dealing with Wik's continued trolling there it would be appreciated. I count a total of 49 reverts on both articles by him - and that's just today. He is now simply creating new sockpuppets to continue edit warring as fast as admins are banning them. The latest sockpuppet to be created is Perhaps protection and an IP ban are called for. --Gene_poole 03:43, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
one of your scripts
I am trying to work out what http://en.wikipedia.org/User:KeithTyler/mwpush.pl does can I by any chance go to a url and add the page something like automated vandalism warnings kind of --☺Adam1213☺ Talk+ 03:03, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
mwpush.pl The script doesn't add content to an existing page. It will erase whatever is there before with whatever you give to it as input. Unless you use the -e option, that is.
I suppose it would not be terribly hard to do this; the script could capture and store the content of the editing textarea during its first visit to the target page when it gets the wpEditToken. Then, the script would need to be further customized to do whatever altering you want it to do to the text. Actually, if all you wanted to do was do something like add a standard template to the top or add something like a category to the bottom of a page, it wouldn't be too hard to improve the script to include "prepend" and "append" options. The script would have to save the original content, then output the prepend text, the original article text, and the append text. There's a variety of ways that could be done...
Keith D. Tyler ¶ 22:45, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
So would I be able to just click a link for example and warn someone .... I dont really understand what your thing does can you give me an example with the purpose of warning a vandal
Code
Does it have to log in if your alread logged in? The link on operating it goes to nowhere.
Probably a big ask but can you have a button so that I could click it and it would warn a vandal. If possible a form to type warning or multiple buttons.
--☺Adam1213☺ Talk+ 00:04, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
White tea
Hi. You asked the caffeine content of white tea on its talk page. In case you don't check it there, I'm pasting my response here: I emailed a few companies that carry white tea. One said White tea has approximately the same amount of caffeine as all other teas (I've heard the "all tea has the same amount of caffeine" thing before, but then why do so many disagree? Is it because they use difference amounts to brew a cup?), one said it has slightly less than green tea, and one said it has about 15 mg per cup (as opposed to 20 for green and 40 for black). Indium 02:59, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Template/Workshop
You, or any Misplaced Pages user, can contribute your suggestions and comments to the /Workshop page of any active arbitration case. Comments on evidence or proposals can help in understanding the import of evidence and in refining proposals. Proposed principles, findings of fact, or remedies may be listed on /Proposed decision and form part of the final decision. Fred Bauder 18:57, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
I'm assuming I got this unexplained comment on my talk page because I'm listed at WP:AMA. In any case, is there any reason for me not to think that adding another page to the Arbitration process just creates a great place that other people can submit reasoned-out comments, and arbs themselves can just exclude from their watchlists? - Keith D. Tyler ¶ 20:21, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
- Yes, listed at WP:AMA. The arbitrators use /Workshop themselves. I can't imagine an effective advocate not using it. Fred Bauder 20:32, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
Thanks for your comment. I mainly remove vandalism and rarly get into pov issues. I edit a bit. --☺Adam1213☺ Talk+ 05:43, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
Poll: Micronation Infobox
An info box template has recently been created by myself and O^O for use in Misplaced Pages articles about micronations and other unrecognised entities, to address longstanding concerns and edit wars that have resulted from the inappropriate use of the standard country infobox in these types of articles.
This new info box has so far been successfully incorporated into the following articles: Sealand, Republic of Rose Island, Independent State of Aramoana, Empire of Atlantium, Avram and Province of Bumbunga, and it is intended to incorporate it into most of the other articles in the in due course.
However, one editor, Samboy has suggested that the micronation infobox should be excluded from Empire of Atlantium on the grounds that the article is "not notable" and because only 22% of micronation articles in Misplaced Pages currently have the info box (ie because the info box project is not yet complete).
As someone who has contributed to similar discussions in the past, I thought this might interest you. I have instituted a poll on this subject here, and invite you to review it if you are so inclined.
Thanks. --Gene_poole 06:13, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
- Thank you for your insightful comment concerning Samboy's shennanigans. Hopefully knowing that everyone can see right through him will have a positive impact on his disruptive behaviour. --Gene_poole 04:40, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
Natasha Demkina
See /Natasha Demkina.
Opinion on RfAr
I believe that User:Chooserr is making potentially very dangerous edits to the birth control articles, such as Condom and Contraceptive patch. I'd like to file an RfAr to get him to stay away from all such articles, and since your statement on the AMA page says that you like to keep the process from getting overused, I figured I'd check with you first. Thanks. --SarekOfVulcan 08:40, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
- Very helpful pointers there. Thanks!--SarekOfVulcan 18:50, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
AMA Request
Responded to the one case regarding the X-Ray girl you were working on before, things seem to have cooled down but if you need another set of eyes and/or more help let me know. --Wgfinley 05:01, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
Image:Government Center Boston vista.jpg has been listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:Government Center Boston vista.jpg, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. |
dbenbenn | talk 00:35, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
AMA
Hello, you are receiving this message because your name is on the list of members of the Association of Members' Advocates. There is a poll being held at Misplaced Pages talk:Association of Members' Advocates for approval of a proposal for the revitalisation of the association. You are eligible to vote and your vote and input are welcome. Izehar 22:23, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
Captcha
Hello Keith. Actually—Yahoo! e-mail uses Captchas to prevent senders of spam . Even if they did not, several of the discussions were "theoretical" about what not-yet-in-practice cost-based techniques could be used—so it would have fit. I think it's important to have Captchas directly linked from at least some major spam overview articles because they're very widespread and yet obscurely named. I spent way too long trying to figure out what they were called, even with the help of Google searching. Would you please restore my edit or find a place for the link that is more suited to your liking? Metaeducation 02:34, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
AMA poll
Keith,
Isn't this poll absolutely ridiculous? Who are all these people, where did they come from and what are they doing? These Izehar and Gator characters, no matter their intentions, have crafted their own proposal and the voting procedure for it seemingly on their own and are now trying to bull it through! How are we going to reconcile this with AMA's previous set-up?
By the way, Alex mentioned not long ago on the talk page that he wasn't active much anymore with AMA and that he thought it was time for an election. Since it seems that one way or another that day is coming soon, would you mind if I put your name forward?
Yours,
Wally 01:26, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
- Well, I would be grossly unsuited to such a role, as I think Sam would be also. Both of us are too contentious and pig-headed. You (and Neigel as well, considering that suggestion) would be effective leaders, though — not only have you both experience and no record of contentious or unproductive behavior, but you both are good at cooperation.
- Guy Finley might be good, too — I've worked with him in the past and he's a good guy with his head (and his heart) in the right place. Wally 19:15, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
- Hey, check out my alternative proposal on the AMA talk page. What do you think? Wally 19:34, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks for the support, Keith. From the initial votes it seems likely to make it. Once the nomination opens, I intend to nominate you and Guy Finley, if he accepts and if you've no objection. Perhaps the time is here to write your election manifesto? ;) Wally 07:27, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
- Keith, do you think it would be a good idea to send a mass message to the AMA? We've nothing approaching consensus on enough scale. I'm not sure how a mass message is affected also, but I wanted to take your advice first. Also, see Guy Finley's hat toss on the talk page. A bit early, I fear. Wally 06:34, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
Thank you!
I'm really glad to hear you wanted to nominate me on the AMA election! Thanks! But I really don't have any interest in getting involved in that for many reasons. First, I'm not sure I have enough time for being Coordinator. Second, I don't think I'm the best to lead the AMA in such a mess; maybe in the future when things get calm and after the new schema proved to work. Third, it would be pretty unfair that I, who called twice for elections, candidate for being coordinator. Hope you understand me --Neigel von Teighen 16:35, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
Just a note from the outgoing AMA Coordinator
Just want to let you know that I have just resigned as Coordinator of the AMA opening the way for an election. If you want to see my statement check the Coodinator's page: Misplaced Pages:AMA Coordinator. Alex756 18:58, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
Image:Faneuil East Color.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:Faneuil East Color.jpg, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.dbenbenn | talk 04:01, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
Re: AMA vs AC
I know, to have Ambi running for our coordination is somewhat uncomfortable, but I hope that, if she's elected, AMA won't get into a vasal of the ArbCom. I do think we need more connection with arbitrators, but she seems to be too close to ArbCom, isn't it? Let's see what happens... Anyway, you have my support. --Neigel von Teighen 21:02, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
Me too, now put up your statement so Hipocrite can't criticize you for it anymore :) .Gator (talk) 22:00, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
Ham Radio!
Please see the discussion at Category talk:Amateur Radio Operator for a discussion on how to identify Hams and Ham personalities on Misplaced Pages. Steve Kd4ttc 02:50, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
AMA Coordinator Election
Keith, please put up your campaign statement on the Coordinator Election page ASAP. Wally 22:23, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
AMA Coordinator Election
Dear AMA Member,
You are entitled to vote in the AMA Coordinator election, set to begin at midnight on 3 February 2006. Please see the pages on the election and its candidates and the procedure and policy and cast a vote by e-mail!
Wally 11:16, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
Infobox discussion
Hi. Further to your comments recently about the Atlantium infobox I thought you'd be interested to know about these AFDs. Seems there's a push on to delete/degrade Wiki's micronation articles at the moment:
, , and --Centauri 02:52, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
AMA results?
Hello Keith , Any news of the definitive AMA 2006 Coordinator Election results? Wikityke 01:22, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks for your reply on my talk page, Keith. Wikityke 22:42, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
Results
No, we brought him in specifically and he made a decision, though along the same lines. Consensus dictated that it be accepted. I encouraged Ambi to call on you as a Deputy Coordinator. Wally 00:49, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
Move bot
You wrote Misplaced Pages:Bot_requests#Mass_move_bot. Do you have any move bot? I plan to move about 500 pages en another wiki, it could be very useful. Maksim-e 18:08, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
Cease your disruptive conduct over Natasha Demkina article: Final warning
Keith, I've put up with an enormous amount of abuse from you over the past three months, from unlawfully violating my copyright to posting false slurs, starting editing wars, and other disruptive conduct. Unless you stop, I will consider filing a user conduct RFC against you. You may not realize it, but I have considerable support from lurkers who do not like what you're doing. Askolnick 23:21, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
RFM
I have no objection for you to file a request for formal mediation; in fact I encourage it. Be sure however to get Askolnick's consent to this before you proceed. --Wade A. Tisthammer 20:05, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for the ND RFM, Keith! Looks good. I didn't see Professor Josephson's critique. in the list of links in bulletpoint #2, does it need to be included on the RFC page? I guess the the question of what constitutes a 'personal web site' is covered by that same bulletpoint? Thanks! - Dreadlocke 20:25, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
My Rfc
There is a Rfc on me. Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/-Lumière I am just an ordinary user that felt that a clearer policy will be useful when there are disputes. If I am left alone on this, I have no chance. Maybe you can give some useful outside view. -Lumière 18:32, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
Describing disputes fairly
Do you really think that "the Discovery Channel-aired test" is more fair and accurate than "the Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal-administered test"? FeloniousMonk 23:42, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
- I believe Keith’s description was fair and accurate; much more so than the statement it was replaced with. To cite CSMMH and leave out the other two major players is inaccurate and really makes no sense. The test was administered by CSICOP and CSMMH under the auspices of the Discovery Channel. The Discovery Channel is the overarching player in the entire production - using the Discovery Channel solo makes perfect sense, leaving it out doesn't.
- The Discovery Channel produced and aired the show, they found Natasha to begin with, they investigated Natasha's background, and then engaged the services of CSICOP-CSMMH. As Keith pointed out, the article’s section is titled “Discovery Channel Appearance”. All three SI articles on the csicop.org website make statements about the Discovery Channel’s involvement that support this view and the documentary is what a majority of people actually viewed regarding ND. So yes, "the Discovery Channel-aired test" is fair, accurate and is NPOV. The mediators should be able to get the gist of the other participants from the Article and Discussion pages.
- Besides the fact that you altered another editor's post, which is frowned upon, from the way I read the instructions on the Request for Mediation page, altering any content, including the post of another editor on that page, is considered vandalism:
- This is backed up by another statement in the instructions:
- Editing of another party's section is not allowed.
- And the kicker from the Requests for Mediation Guide which says:
- "Do not edit the "Issues to mediate" section. If you feel that an issue has been incorrectly stated, restate it in your section with a simple note at the end of the line such as "(Restatement of second issue by User:Example)."
- And the kicker from the Requests for Mediation Guide which says:
- May I suggest you revert your change to Keith’s post?
Request for Advocate
Are you willing to help with This postulated ArbCom case? I'd appreciate a prompt decision, so that I can look elsewhere if need be. I am going to be absurdly busy, so the help will be especially necessary. Sam Spade 17:43, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
Hello:
Hi I'm a new Wikipedian from Natick, Mass (A Mile 1/2 From Rt 16)... just popped in to say hello to a neighbor:"
This user is a citizen of the United States of America. |
This user is from Massachusetts. |
File:Peace Sign 2.svg Merlinus (talk)
- Hi I Am Marc:
I was recently married to my lovely wife; We have lived together for several years already...
- We love cats (3 currently own us)... Jeffy(15), Echo(6) & Gizmo(3). All sleep with us in the big bed and no room to move an inch.
- I was Disabled in a 1993 (Coma)/ and am very slowly recovering. It's tough going out sometimes, though with friends I still do. I have a few supportive friends.
- I am an "Unenrolled voter." Democrat/ Republicans, I don't care, whoever serves makes my life better in the long run I vote for!
- Avid reader. Has collection of many hundreds of rare books. Especially Science Fiction and Fantasy.
- Avid Music collector (2,500 albums)...mostly bootlegs...mostly rare bootlegs...Stones, Kinks, Clapton, Beatles. and solos!
I am what I am I'm strongly opinionated about disabled peoples' rights and jobs for American citizens who have trouble finding minimum wage jobs in my state today and support Universal health care, I would be dead if I did not have it. I am an idiot about Internet social skills. I hope that the Immigration Reform bill will protect disabled citizens who wish to work like myself first before considering allowing new people to come here. I was searching for an internet forum to be my outlet to express my needs, but found that Misplaced Pages is not best suited for that. I'm brushing up on Misplaced Pages's rules of conduct, and slowly starting to begin contributing again.
Current book and CD I own hundreds of rare books
- Current Book Jack Whyte: "Uther"
- Current CD Faves:
- Warren Zevon... "Life'll Kill Ya"
- Howlin' Wolf: "Greatest Hits"
- Latest Flick: "Charles II: The Last King"
File:Peace Sign 2.svg Merlinus (talk)
Help with dispute on article "Friends of South Asia"
Hi Keith. I found your name on the AMA members list, and I'm hoping you can offer some advice.
I've been working on an article about Friends of South Asia (FOSA), a small Silicon Valley peace group made up of expat Indian-Americans and Pakistani-Americans advocating for peace between their two countries through vigils, letter-writing, etc. Apparently FOSA is very strongly hated by Indian and Hindu nationalists, who believe that FOSA is harming Indian and/or Hindu interests by calling for secularism and peace between the two countries.
When I encountered the article, it was short on facts, and presented in a way that appeared biased against the group (see initial revision). I've been working on the article, and added a substantial amount of detail -- both on the group, as well as on specific criticisms. ISKapoor and Cardreader kept deleting segments of the text that didn't match their POV, so I started sourcing every statement possible. (See my most recent revision.)
Those two users continue to delete significant chunks of the text with kneejerk reversions (at least four in the past four days). Of particular interest is the fact that they keep deleting any evidence that FOSA is critical of the Pakistani government (presumably because it doesn't jive with their POV that the Friends of South Asia organization is supposedly pro-Pakistan/anti-India); they then go on to complain on the talk page that the organization is pro-Pakistan/anti-India, in spite of the fact that they've been deleting fully-cited information to the contrary.
If you want to find out about the Friends of South Asia organization, check out the third-party references at the end of my last version of the article text (half of those references keep getting deleted by the Indian nationalist editors).
I posted this to Misplaced Pages:Third opinion two days ago, but haven't gotten any third party feedback. Can you look at the article's talk page and history? Can I get some advice on what to do next? I hate revert wars, and want to avoid getting into a stupid contest of I-can-revert-faster-than-you.
- Anirvan 22:29, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
WikiProject Telecommunications
I've signed up for the WP on the proposal page, but notice that there's been a significant amount of time that's passed since the proposal was listed. I've noticed a lot of "hit and run" editing (not a bad thing, just that people don't converse much, just change details in telecomm) and wonder if it's allowable/encouraged to make a note of the prospective WikiProject on key telecomm articles?
Generally, I specialize in cellular carriers and MVNOs, but would find it fun to work on SONET, NANP, CLEC, and other interesting land-articles. (Yes, I'm a telecomm geek that is disguised as a violinist by day! Talk about a secret identity!)
Lemme know if you've got any feedback please! ~Kylu (u|t) 02:02, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
Next with ND?
What do we do next with the ND article? I don't believe AS will relinquish his death-grip on content. No comments from the other disputants either... - Dreadlocke 05:54, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
- I hope you're right and he's gone, but you'll have to forgive me if I have my doubts. I'll be happy to work with Mikka and BillC and see if we can put a good article in place. Is it safe to assume that both the Siqueira and Josephson critiques are citable references? And, um, I will attempt to be as obstreperous-less as possible.. :) - Dreadlocke 18:50, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
I put together a rough draft of everything I think should be included in the ND article: ND First Draft. If you have the time, check it out and let me know what you think. I'll post a link on the ND Talk: page in a day or two for comments from the others. Thanks! Dreadlocke 21:23, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
- Link to the draft rewrite on the ND Talk page is up! - Dreadlocke 20:51, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
I took your advice on the ND draft rewrite and reduced the amount of Josephson and the number of math-related References; I also restructured the article to eliminate the entire "criticism" section, consolidating and placing the information in the relevant sections. Let me know what you think. Thanks! - Dreadlocke 19:42, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
- I've tried to incorporate both your and BillC's suggestions into the article, hopefully I've succeeded in doing so - but if not, I need a few more specifics about what to change. I've rewritten, removed or attributed the information I pulled from the Josephson critique - which I think covers BillC's concerns around that. I provided reasoning for the inclusion of the Siqueira and Zammit links from "External Links/Further Reading". I can put it up for RfC, if you really think I need to, but I was thinking (hoping!) that if you and BillC agree on my draft it would be sufficient to put it into place. - Dreadlocke 22:07, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
- I'm not sure where to put it under WP:RFC. It's not a exactly a dispute at the moment, more of a "check this out to see if it's ok" sort of thing... - Dreadlocke
- I totally agree with you about getting more feedback on the draft before putting it into place. I'll at least put another note on the talk: page and prepare for serious sparkage when I actually put it into place, but it would be nice to get a few more opinions first. Hmmm. I'll scan through the RfC stuff again to see about trying to squeeze it in there, or maybe your suggestion about putting it in WP:3O would be a good start - although it's listing requirement seems a bit too specific for what we need...unless it's just you and me in a controversy on how to get more opinions.. :)
- And, wow! Thanks for pointing out Misplaced Pages:Criticism, that's a very interesting article and one that really applies to some of my questions around the "skeptics vs paranormal" content in some articles. - Dreadlocke 23:36, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
This totally has to be a "Star Wars" Freudian slip edit summary...C-3PO :) - Dreadlocke 23:55, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
Maybe we could re-open your Peer review or at least contact the two editors who responded to it. Looks like they had some suggestions that are incorporated in the draft. - Dreadlocke 17:08, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
- Did you take a look at Misplaced Pages:Peer review/Natasha Demkina? It's old, but it might be helpful. I see RJH has given you some feedback recently. - Keith D. Tyler ¶ (AMA) 17:53, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
I sure did! I noticed it the other day and I pinged both of the editors who initially responded to your request, and as you saw, RJH responded with some good feedback! I'm not sure how much further I can push this forward, I'm thinking of posting one more statement on the ND Discussion page saying that I'm going to move forward unless there are major objections or more feedback from anyone, then wait a bit before posting it. I'm tired of looking at it, if the truth be told... :) - Dreadlocke 18:19, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
- All I ask is that you make sure you don't libel anyone. :) - Keith D. Tyler ¶ (AMA) 18:39, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
- Oh god, yes! I want to avoid the screaming banshee cry of
LIBEL!!
at all costs! :) It's almost frightening to think I'm actually close to trying to get this thing posted...thanks for your help. Hopefully the sparks will be minimal. - Dreadlocke 22:37, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
Request for Advocate
Hi Keith, I have a situation that may require some advice and assistance (see ). It's quite a complicated business involving many users, with a highly contentious content dispute and questionable behaviour by certain users. It looks likely to enter arbitration after 2 failed mediations and 2 rfc's. If you are available I would very much welcome your advice, I'll also be able to explain the issues in more detail. Thanks.--Zleitzen 04:33, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks for the pointer to the List of active autonomist and secessionist movements! That's what I was looking for. Jswhitten 19:02, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for the work on John Hancock Tower.
A citation or two would still be good, of course, but it's much better now. The worst of the peacock feathers have been removed. Dpbsmith (talk) 00:49, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
Time of Your Life
A dab is not needed because the Mariah article is about a ringtone. It is also a copyvio. -- getcrunkjuice 19:42, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
Userboxes
KeithTyler, as you are the author of a proposal yourself, I invite you to read my essay on what should be done with the matter. Hopefully this essay (which tries to achieve a middle ground between the two sides) will become a proposal to attempt to change WP policy- because this debate is hurting Misplaced Pages and dividing the userbase too much. I would hope you could read my essay and comment, both on how to improve it and on how to make it into a proposal to vote to vote. Thanks! // True Sora 00:45, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
Tim Dingle
I propose that you do bring it up at deletion review. In the meantime I have to deleted it as a repost of previously deleted material. -- Francs2000 22:54, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
ND Draft
Should I move the whole thing to the ND talk page, or just post a link to it's current location? - Dreadlocke 19:12, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
Temporary inbox
I've removed your request for semiprotection here , but I think I'll keep the page on my watchlist just in case. --HappyCamper 21:59, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
Ann Furedi
Hi Keith!
There was no AfD discussion for Ann Furedi. The revision history is somewhat confused, but please bear with me as I try to give you what I think are the facts, from the point I came in, anyway:
- Article created }
- Article nominated for speedy delete } these three steps possibly happened a couple of times
- Article deleted }
- Article recreated
- Article nominated for speedy delete
- Author contacts WP:ANI and asks for help on why her article keeps disappearing
- Article deleted
- Article restored by an admin
- Article nominated for speedy delete
- Article deleted by me
- Original admin drops me a line (in effect, admins are wheel-warring in good faith without knowing it at this point)
- Article restored be me
- Talk page conversations between me, original admin, CSD nominator and author about the article, its deletions, recreations and future
- Article tagged for notability and categorisation requirements by me
- Fairly good faith slow-motion "edit war" between inexperienced editors on article
- Discussion on article talk page starts to reach the beginning of a consensus (or at least a consensus on how everybody is acting in good faith) thanks to a third party stepping in
- You write to article talk page
- I write to you.
Of course, this is horribly convoluted, and if you came in to it in the middle, you probably didn't have a clue what was going on. For that I apologise - a Wiki should makes these things transparent; when they're obscured, they're really really obscured but that wasn't clear when I logged off last night. It is now!
In theory, given a couple of days leeway, the editors on the page should be able to come to some calm understanding about the future of the article. The options on the table appear to be expansion, merger or (AfD) delete. The article will not be speedied again, but that isn't to say it won't be deleted. I'm confident that the editors in question can come to a consensus given a bit of time; the article remains on my watchlist and I'll keep it that way. Both editors are acting in good faith, so that should see things through.
Hope this potted explanation helps. If not, drop me a line with your questions and I'll do my best to answer them! Thanks ➨ ЯЄDVERS 18:50, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
Advocate
I know exactly why I'm an advocate and it's not so I'll become and admin, if you see one of my early say "cases" you will see my approach was a lot different. It was just with Jeff I didn't agree with him at all and I couldn't see his point. Well it's over --Mahogany 12:12, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
- I didn't one of the involed tried to --Mahogany 19:39, 31 May 2006 (UTC) (I took it to the admin. notice board after a couple of days)
- Can either one of you talk to this person? He is at it again, now making references to "rabbit666" on his talk. Ideally im looking for him to leave me alone- what ive wanted since the first day this started.
- Despite the "arbitration process" im still being put through this- is that how it is meant to work? Is there someone in authority, I mean real authority on[REDACTED] that can look into this? This is not right. Fluffy999 00:25, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
- Take it to admin. Incident board but I'm still here for you Fluffy --Mahogany 12:12, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
User:Jeff Fenstermacher
Keith,
The point you raise about protecting the page - I don't consider it an appropriate response to 3RR violations. Anyone else who wants to edit the article is bound to ask "Why am I being penalised when someone else committed a blockable offence? Why not block the editors as you're supposed to and let us get on with it?" It's less confrontational, I agree, but only because it's less personal, not because it's less damaging. As for Jeff coming back through his IP, if I remember correctly he didn't use it to edit Falun Gong, just to protest his block.
I would have posted this openly on WP:ANI, but that section seems to have been archived despite only being active a day ago. Maybe it happens around month ends. --Sam Blanning 13:30, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
Request for comment
Hi! Just wanted to let you know that User:Marskell had initiated an RfC on my behaviour at Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/Aquirata. You may wish to comment. Aquirata 13:40, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
Editor comments in articles
What kind of statements can Misplaced Pages editors add to an article that aren't verifiable by content, but instead are gleaned from a lack of content according to the editor's own observations. There's a comment on the Village pump about the ability of editors to include their own "analysis" of a website.
This Village Pump question is by an editor who made an entry that I thought was POV, so I asked for a citation. I removed the entry after he admitted that he did not have one - he tried to justify it by claiming it should stand unless someone proved it wrong. That didn't really fly, so then it morphed into proposed statement of: "A thorough examining of her website reveals no attempt to evidence her teachings." which seems kind of weird to me...
It just looks like since the other editor can't seem to find any citable sources for criticism about the subject of the article, he's making his own comment about evidence, but it's wrapped up in an apparent comment about the contents of the website itself.
The latest version is: “No part of the site is specifically devoted to the topic of providing proof that Esther is channelling anyone - although many testomonials of her clients are available."
Is this a good comment to include in a Misplaced Pages article? In the past, I’ve been caught up in finding citable references for all my edits, but this is the first time I’ve encountered an Editor’s own observation that utilizes the reader’s potential observation as a reference.
Thanks! Dreadlocke 16:54, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
- Thank you, Keith. As always, your guidance is much appreciated. Dreadlocke 17:57, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
Askolnick is back
Askolnick reverted virtually the entire ND expansion and is continuing the dispute over sources and content. What do we do now - arbitration? Dreadlocke 01:47, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
- I never left. What you should do now -- finally -- is to respect Wiki pollicies and guidelines against using disreputable sources. You may have thought the coast was clear to renew adding falsehoods and statements unsupported by reputable sources. You were wrong. Askolnick 12:46, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
Was your expansion to the article the same content as the draft that you've been working on, inviting input into, getting feedback on from various editors, etc.? Also, I see there is a Wikiproject applicable to the article; I'd suggest drumming up advice on the Talk page there. Presumably those editors have had to struggle with NPOV conflicts in these matters before. - Keith D. Tyler ¶ (AMA) 19:54, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, it was exactly the same content as in the draft, but I hadn't yet added the expanded sections on Japan and CSICOP, just the History and Appearance in London sections of the draft. I'm the one who added the "Project Paranormal" tag to see if the project was still "alive" and to see if there is anyone who can give advice and assistance in evaluating the disputed sources and content. I really don't see much of an alternative to arbitration at this point, we've been through all the other steps of Dispute resolution. It's the same old story, and the bottom line is whether or not Natasha's own website, Pravda.ru, and Josephson's pages are acceptable references, which apparently needs arbitration - unless consensus overrides the objections. Dreadlocke 20:10, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
AMA
Might I beg the honour of an audience? Good, I thought so.
I am interested in Misplaced Pages policy and process, and also in RL debating and law. Having been aroung Misplaced Pages for a few months, I thought it might be interesting to become an advocate. However, I'm a bit scared I might muck it up to start with, and don't entirely understand what's involved. It therefore would be absolutely terrific if I could shadow you or another advocate for another month or so, observing what you do (where this is compatible with client confidentiality, of course), and learning the Misplaced Pages advocate's craft. Now, I realise that this is a big thing to ask you or someone else to do, and will entirely understand if it is not possible. Thanks, David.Mestel 17:09, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
Ripper (television)
Just so you know, this article was deleted on 17 Jun 2006 as per consensus. You can see the debate at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Log/2006 June 8#Ripper (television). In all likelihood this article will be quickly deleted again.
The members of Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Buffyverse are considering creating a Buffyverse undeveloped projects page. If you would like to add something, your opinions would be welcomed on our talk page. - Che Nuevara: 12:58, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
Consensus vote on sources for ND
I would appreciate your vote on the source dispute for the Natasha Demkina draft.
I hope this is a good idea...should I expand it to an RfC? Dreadlocke 19:14, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
- "DL". I love it! What a great nickname! Thanks for added clarity on the "dubious source" issue! I have searched high and low for more sources - I did find this interesting source: Iran Daily.com, short and sweet.. :) DL - 23:16, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
I further translated Natasha's Russian website and found information there about the trip to Japan! I've re-sourced the draft and put the remaining comments sourced from Pravda.RU on User:Dreadlocke/Sourced_from_Pravda.RU. I also gave a shot to using the Iran Daily as a source. Hmmm. Dreadlocke 06:01, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
- Here is the problem with the translation above, the information I downloaded was from this now-dead link: . How can I use that information? Dreadlocke 06:48, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
- Wow, interesting point. I didn't even consider a translation as a possible violation of WP:NOR. The way I read Misplaced Pages:Reliable_sources#Sources_in_languages_other_than_English doesn't make it look like OR since it has an original source that anyone can verify for themselves. Looks like we can get full consensus on Natasha's Russian website, Mikka's offer to translate has apparently assured Askolnick. Dreadlocke 15:33, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
- My other question is whether I can use information from a link that's no longer available. It looks like I can as long as I give an access date WP:CITE#What_to_do_when_a_reference_link_.22goes_dead.22 for the information. This is for the trip to Japan, the info used to be on Natasha's website, but now I can't find it. I downloaded it, so I have the actual copy - which is more or less what Pravda.RU said about the trip. I still think we can include comments from Pravda.RU according to dubious sources - although the wording of that article was fluctuating until it was protected. Dreadlocke 15:47, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
I believe everyone should be held accountable for their actions and their statements. That's why I'm posting here the outrageously false statement Keith Tyler recently made in his campaign to use one of the world's sleaziest news tabloids as a source of information supporting paranormal belief in Wiki's Natasha Demkina article.
A few days ago, he voted in favor of using information from Pravda.Ru and falsely claimed:
- "In fact, no one has presented any evidence why Pravda.Ru is any less reliable than, say, People Magazine or the Washington Times. The only reasons presented against its use are undefended accusations of its character. We aren't talking Weekly World News here. - Keith D. Tyler"
That is such an whopper of a falsehood, considering how other editors and I repeatedly pointed out to him just how sleazy Pravda RU is. It only takes a pair of eyes and honest intent to see this. For example, these are just from TODAY's "science" news headlines:
- "Humans to decipher the DNA of God and clone another Christ"
- "Men with biggest reproductive organs all live in England"
- "KGB ran secret laboratories to study extraterrestrial civilizations"
- "US forces to attack heterosexual soldiers with homosexual bombs"
- "Aliens probably build their bases on Earth’s seabed disturbing submarines"
- "U.S. scientist says scores of UFOs fly around the Sun"
- "Dragons came down to Earth from Sirius to share their wisdom with humans"
- "Mankind descended from civilization of Atlanteans in the Arctic"
- "Blind Russian mystic discerns colors by touch"
"We aren't talking Weekly World News," Tyler argued. Right. We're talking Pravda RU -- which regularly stoops far lower in the journalistic gutter than the Weekly World News ever does. Yet Tyler continues to defend Pravda RU's reputation in his campaign to use the sleazy tabloid as a source of information for the Natasha Demkina article. People who come here to learn about Keith Tyler's editing record should know this.Askolnick 20:03, 1 July 2006 (UTC)