| Revision as of 21:31, 16 July 2014 view source86.141.98.152 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:58, 17 July 2014 view source BlackJack (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users100,203 edits replyNext edit → | ||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| It is only fair to say that you do a good job of keeping the voices of your nutty friends but your edit summaries are the give away. If you see today's Times you will realise he is just like you _ off his chump.A lot of work too copying out cricketarchivefor an audience of none. | It is only fair to say that you do a good job of keeping the voices of your nutty friends but your edit summaries are the give away. If you see today's Times you will realise he is just like you _ off his chump.A lot of work too copying out cricketarchivefor an audience of none. | ||
| Let's just say that as I watch the Scheldt from the window, I am so glad I am not you and wasting time | Let's just say that as I watch the Scheldt from the window, I am so glad I am not you and wasting time | ||
| :I have no idea what you are talking about and I don't suppose you do either. As I've told you before, your obsession with certain people on this site and your infantile behavior leave me to conclude that it is you who is "off his chump". As for wasting time, well, it's my time to waste, isn't it? At least I am doing something positive instead of allowing myself to be eaten away by persistent jealousy and the need to confront other people on a routine basis. How far can you fling the 2014 ''Wisden'' from your pram, by the way? | |||
| :Last time I had contact with you, you were supposed to be "helping" with the Bowes article? What happened to that, then? Just another of your lies, was it? I'm working on tour articles at present because they are a mess and I've had very little contact with other site users during the last two or three months as your obsessive monitoring of my contribs page must tell you. Your opening sentence is yet more Double Dutch. I don't read ''The Times''. | |||
| :I may as well tell you this given your current attitude. Recently, one of the admins here sent me a mail to say that, finally, the police have been alerted to your activities. I'm not especially interested in getting involved with that but if the police contact me I will answer their questions. I would imagine there is a case for an harassment prosecution but then it's you that claims to be the "lawyer", so you tell me. If you end up in court or worse, whose time has been wasted then? | |||
| :Grow up, moron. | |||
Revision as of 04:58, 17 July 2014
It is only fair to say that you do a good job of keeping the voices of your nutty friends but your edit summaries are the give away. If you see today's Times you will realise he is just like you _ off his chump.A lot of work too copying out cricketarchivefor an audience of none. Let's just say that as I watch the Scheldt from the window, I am so glad I am not you and wasting time
- I have no idea what you are talking about and I don't suppose you do either. As I've told you before, your obsession with certain people on this site and your infantile behavior leave me to conclude that it is you who is "off his chump". As for wasting time, well, it's my time to waste, isn't it? At least I am doing something positive instead of allowing myself to be eaten away by persistent jealousy and the need to confront other people on a routine basis. How far can you fling the 2014 Wisden from your pram, by the way?
- Last time I had contact with you, you were supposed to be "helping" with the Bowes article? What happened to that, then? Just another of your lies, was it? I'm working on tour articles at present because they are a mess and I've had very little contact with other site users during the last two or three months as your obsessive monitoring of my contribs page must tell you. Your opening sentence is yet more Double Dutch. I don't read The Times.
- I may as well tell you this given your current attitude. Recently, one of the admins here sent me a mail to say that, finally, the police have been alerted to your activities. I'm not especially interested in getting involved with that but if the police contact me I will answer their questions. I would imagine there is a case for an harassment prosecution but then it's you that claims to be the "lawyer", so you tell me. If you end up in court or worse, whose time has been wasted then?
- Grow up, moron.