| Revision as of 00:41, 17 July 2014 editNeilN (talk | contribs)134,455 edits Final warning: Adding original research, including unpublished syntheses of sources on Princess Jasmine. (TW)← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:32, 17 July 2014 edit undoNeilN (talk | contribs)134,455 edits →July 2014Next edit → | ||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
| ] You may be '''] without further warning''' the next time you violate Misplaced Pages's ] by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at ]. <!-- Template:uw-nor4 --> ] <sup>]</sup> 00:41, 17 July 2014 (UTC) | ] You may be '''] without further warning''' the next time you violate Misplaced Pages's ] by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at ]. <!-- Template:uw-nor4 --> ] <sup>]</sup> 00:41, 17 July 2014 (UTC) | ||
| The next time you make an edit list , I will ask at ] that you be blocked until you show you understand and can abide by our ]. --] <sup>]</sup> 21:32, 17 July 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:32, 17 July 2014
March 2014
Hello, I'm Geraldo Perez. Your recent edit to the page Aurora (Disney) appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. See http://princess.disney.com/aurora Geraldo Perez (talk) 03:10, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Ariel (The Little Mermaid)
Hello, just to let you know, I reverted your addition to Ariel (The Little Mermaid) because the reference you linked to was a fan interpretation/analysis of the movie, and isn't a reliable reference by wikipedia's standards. (See: WP:QUESTIONABLE) AD (talk) 22:18, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I see you're still trying to add that to the article, we can discuss it here if you like? What you added is considered original research and isn't allowed, what's needed is a reliable reference. AD (talk) 23:09, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
- Hello again, I just reverted another of your edits, would you like to discuss it? AD (talk) 00:34, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
June 2014
Please do not add or change content, as you did to Cinderella (Disney character), without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Misplaced Pages:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. NeilN 11:16, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Cinderella (Disney character). This contravenes Misplaced Pages's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. NeilN 16:23, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Misplaced Pages, as you did at Cinderella (Disney character). NeilN 13:40, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Cinderella (Disney character) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. NeilN 12:39, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring. The thread is Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Joshuaj102003 reported by User:NeilN (Result: ). Thank you. NeilN 11:16, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
June 2014
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Acroterion (talk) 11:24, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
July 2014
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Misplaced Pages, as you did at Maleficent. NeilN 06:39, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Misplaced Pages's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Princess Jasmine. NeilN 00:41, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
The next time you make an edit list this, I will ask at WP:ANI that you be blocked until you show you understand and can abide by our no original research policy. --NeilN 21:32, 17 July 2014 (UTC)