Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license.
Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat.
We can research this topic together.
{{GA|07:26, 3 August 2014 (UTC)|topic=Socsci|page=1}}
{{GA nominee|01:41, 9 March 2014 (UTC)|nominator=<small><span style="background-color:#ffffff;border: 1px solid;">]</span></small>]|page=1|subtopic=Law|status=onreview|note=}}
{{dyktalk|13 March|2014|entry= ... that ''']''' just one week after Hong Kong journalists rallied for press freedom and against his removal as editor of the '']''?}}
{{dyktalk|13 March|2014|entry= ... that ''']''' just one week after Hong Kong journalists rallied for press freedom and against his removal as editor of the '']''?}}
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hong Kong, a project to coordinate efforts in improving all Hong Kong-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Hong Kong-related articles, you are invited to join this project.Hong KongWikipedia:WikiProject Hong KongTemplate:WikiProject Hong KongHong Kong
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related
A fact from Knife attack on Kevin Lau appeared on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the Did you know column on 13 March 2014 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that Kevin Lau was violently assaulted just one week after Hong Kong journalists rallied for press freedom and against his removal as editor of the Ming Pao?
A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
Well-written. Improved the only two minor issues I noticed myself.
As per the comments just left yesterday from my good article mentor regarding the other article I started reviewing a couple days before this one, I need to do a more thorough check for copyright violations and close paraphrasing. I should be able to do that by the end of the weekend. Freikorp (talk) 14:15, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
After a thorough analysis, I find no major issues. There are a couple exact matches of words that go into double digits. I'd prefer if they were reworded:
19 words: "in 1998 radio talk show host albert cheng was stabbed by a group of thugs while leaving his office"
12: "said they were not aware of any evidence linking the attack to"
Some minor rewording wouldn't hurt on these 3, but i'm not as concerned about them
11: "president xi jinping former premier wen jiabao and several members of"
10: "rammed the gate of his home with a stolen car"
9: "a petition demanding an explanation for lau's removal and"
Checklinks finds two dead links; these need to be update or replaced: It says a third reference is suspicious but it appears to be working fine for me. Whilst I am personally a big fan of template's like cite web, your referencing style is clear and consistent, and I do not see any other issue here.
I do not usually citation templates; there is no obligation to use them. The "dead links" readout is caused by sites where the tool cannot directly access the content. The urls in question are subscription articles, and are not dead. -- Ohc 07:47, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
Sentences "The South China Morning Post noted that AM730, an outspoken tabloid free-sheet, suffered a concerted advertising boycott from mainland Chinese companies." and "Beijing's representative office frequently pressures the free media in Hong Kong to revise or remove coverage that it dislikes." need inline citations, due to their libellous (but almost certainly true) allegations. Consider whether the word "noted", used twice in this paragraph, is the most appropriate word to use here as per WP:CLAIM. Incidentally whilst we're talking about this paragraph, consider whether "soft pressure" is the most effective title. I can gather what is meant by the term, but it's hardly a common and perhaps not an encyclopaedic term. How about simply 'Press freedoms' or something similar?
Done. The facts were covered by the cite at the end of the paragraph, and I have now apposed the cite after each assertion. -- Ohc 07:47, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
Not sure if this is the right place to bring this issue up, but it needs to be addressed nonetheless. The 'Arrests' section is too thin, but more importantly, it gives no further information than what is already in the lead. In fact, it is the exact same information that appears in the lead. You should be able to easily add a couple more sentences using the citation already provided.
Aside from minor points mentioned above, no obvious bias. Given the nature of the incident, it can hardly be considered strange that most of the reactions have condemned the attack and the suspected motivations for it.
