| Revision as of 22:49, 17 August 2014 editSalimfadhley (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers8,121 edits Creating deletion discussion page for Trikasthanas (astrology). (TW) | Revision as of 04:09, 18 August 2014 edit undoAditya soni (talk | contribs)2,743 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| :({{Find sources|Trikasthanas (astrology)}}) | :({{Find sources|Trikasthanas (astrology)}}) | ||
| This essay seems to be composed of equal parts ] and high fantasy. None of the sources seem to back up any of the claims made in the article and the subject does not seem to have been relevant to any serious scholarship that I can find. Furthermore it is written in such dense and incomprehensible prose that at first I thought the entire thing was a hoax. ] (]) 22:49, 17 August 2014 (UTC) | This essay seems to be composed of equal parts ] and high fantasy. None of the sources seem to back up any of the claims made in the article and the subject does not seem to have been relevant to any serious scholarship that I can find. Furthermore it is written in such dense and incomprehensible prose that at first I thought the entire thing was a hoax. ] (]) 22:49, 17 August 2014 (UTC) | ||
| :'''Do not delete:'''. ] is a reference work containing a comprehensive summary of information either from all branches of knowledge or from a particular branch of knowledge. The information can appear to be too technical for most not aware of the particular branch of knowledge this article deals with. This article deals with a particular aspect of ] and does not describe a work or element of fiction. Agreed that this article does contain intricate detail but that detail is meant for those who have a specific interest in Hindu astrology, it is not meant for those who are not acquainted with Hindu astrology. Encyclopedia is certainly not a compendium of short-stories, and it does not teach. The listed sources are all reliable and the relied upon texts are available online, in the market and libraries. This article in any case does not present fringe theories and is based on reliable sources and is not a hoax, and is not an original research.] (]) 04:09, 18 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 04:09, 18 August 2014
Trikasthanas (astrology)
- Trikasthanas (astrology) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This essay seems to be composed of equal parts Original Research and high fantasy. None of the sources seem to back up any of the claims made in the article and the subject does not seem to have been relevant to any serious scholarship that I can find. Furthermore it is written in such dense and incomprehensible prose that at first I thought the entire thing was a hoax. Salimfadhley (talk) 22:49, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
- Do not delete:. Encyclopedia is a reference work containing a comprehensive summary of information either from all branches of knowledge or from a particular branch of knowledge. The information can appear to be too technical for most not aware of the particular branch of knowledge this article deals with. This article deals with a particular aspect of Hindu astrology and does not describe a work or element of fiction. Agreed that this article does contain intricate detail but that detail is meant for those who have a specific interest in Hindu astrology, it is not meant for those who are not acquainted with Hindu astrology. Encyclopedia is certainly not a compendium of short-stories, and it does not teach. The listed sources are all reliable and the relied upon texts are available online, in the market and libraries. This article in any case does not present fringe theories and is based on reliable sources and is not a hoax, and is not an original research.Aditya soni (talk) 04:09, 18 August 2014 (UTC)