User talk:Lucia Black: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 14:55, 21 August 2014 editThibbs (talk \| contribs)28,090 edits →Please don't leave for good: new section← Previous edit		Revision as of 15:22, 21 August 2014 edit undoTheFarix (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers134,691 edits →Please don't leave for good Next edit →
Line 26:		Line 26:

	Obviously you're upset and you think that there are those who are unjustifiably out to punish you. That's completely understandable and even though I don't fully agree I will use that as the basis for my comment here. Don't let your detractors have the last word. Prove them all wrong. The power to do that is completely within your hands. You are a capable editor and your contributions to the encyclopedia have at times been excellent. Nothing anybody says can change that because facts speak for themselves. Leave some time for tensions to cool off and then please consider giving editing another shot. Don't just ''say'' that the ban was unwarranted. ''Show'' that it was unwarranted through your actions elsewhere and then get the ban lifted and make your comeback. This is something you can and will accomplish if you make it a goal and set your mind to it. Editor diversity is something I care a lot about and I think it would be a damn shame to lose your voice completely. -] (]) 14:55, 21 August 2014 (UTC)		Obviously you're upset and you think that there are those who are unjustifiably out to punish you. That's completely understandable and even though I don't fully agree I will use that as the basis for my comment here. Don't let your detractors have the last word. Prove them all wrong. The power to do that is completely within your hands. You are a capable editor and your contributions to the encyclopedia have at times been excellent. Nothing anybody says can change that because facts speak for themselves. Leave some time for tensions to cool off and then please consider giving editing another shot. Don't just ''say'' that the ban was unwarranted. ''Show'' that it was unwarranted through your actions elsewhere and then get the ban lifted and make your comeback. This is something you can and will accomplish if you make it a goal and set your mind to it. Editor diversity is something I care a lot about and I think it would be a damn shame to lose your voice completely. -] (]) 14:55, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
			:Unfortunately {{u\|Thibbs}}, it is already too late. There have a small cabal of editors on the AN forums that have been calling for her to be WP:SITEBAN ever since the WP:IBAN between her and Chris went into affect. And while those editors didn't get the WP:SITEBAN they were seeking, they got the next best thing. A indefinite ban in all topic areas that she edited in with no chance of repeal. Something like this should have went to ] from the start instead of allowed to fester on the AN forms, and frankly, I think she would have gotten a much fairer treatment there than being constantly harassed on AN. —''']''' (] \| ]) 15:22, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:22, 21 August 2014

Click to add a topic

Archives

Whoever is reading: Farewell.

Its such a shame i had few more GAs planned. But i guess i can't talk about them, so all my projects on my page are welcomed to be improved/created. I can't really say much. For now, the only interest i have is so that these injustices don't happen again to another member who has also been targeted heavily, not by the level of disruption, but the number of ANIs created. So if you're interested in that, let me know and we can create a sandbox. Other than that, i can't say much other than farewell.

I'm literally limited to what i can say at this point. So forgive me if this seems rushed, or apathetic. Lucia Black (talk) 14:37, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Writer's Barnstar

Lucia, I am sorry that the community decided to enact a ban against you. However, even those who supported such a ban would likely concede that you have, over the years, created some solid content that ultimately benefits Misplaced Pages's readers. Thank you for your contributions. Take a break, and eventually you can appeal the topic ban. Best, and God bless, Go Phightins! 14:48, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

Please don't leave for good

Obviously you're upset and you think that there are those who are unjustifiably out to punish you. That's completely understandable and even though I don't fully agree I will use that as the basis for my comment here. Don't let your detractors have the last word. Prove them all wrong. The power to do that is completely within your hands. You are a capable editor and your contributions to the encyclopedia have at times been excellent. Nothing anybody says can change that because facts speak for themselves. Leave some time for tensions to cool off and then please consider giving editing another shot. Don't just say that the ban was unwarranted. Show that it was unwarranted through your actions elsewhere and then get the ban lifted and make your comeback. This is something you can and will accomplish if you make it a goal and set your mind to it. Editor diversity is something I care a lot about and I think it would be a damn shame to lose your voice completely. -Thibbs (talk) 14:55, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

Unfortunately Thibbs, it is already too late. There have a small cabal of editors on the AN forums that have been calling for her to be WP:SITEBAN ever since the WP:IBAN between her and Chris went into affect. And while those editors didn't get the WP:SITEBAN they were seeking, they got the next best thing. A indefinite ban in all topic areas that she edited in with no chance of repeal. Something like this should have went to WP:ABCOM from the start instead of allowed to fester on the AN forms, and frankly, I think she would have gotten a much fairer treatment there than being constantly harassed on AN. —Farix (t | c) 15:22, 21 August 2014 (UTC)