Revision as of 00:17, 20 September 2014 editBbb23 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators271,595 edits →A barnstar for you!: remove self-awarded barnstar by new user← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:20, 20 September 2014 edit undoBbb23 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators271,595 edits Warning: Violating the three-revert rule on Aquiline nose. (TW)Next edit → | ||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
Hello, I added an explanation. This was mentioned by another user as well, where the term does not have any respectable evidence. None of the papers cited mention this term as an alternative. | Hello, I added an explanation. This was mentioned by another user as well, where the term does not have any respectable evidence. None of the papers cited mention this term as an alternative. | ||
:Did you actually read the cite I added and the talk page? --] <sup>]</sup> 23:55, 19 September 2014 (UTC) | :Did you actually read the cite I added and the talk page? --] <sup>]</sup> 23:55, 19 September 2014 (UTC) | ||
] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. | |||
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 00:20, 20 September 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:20, 20 September 2014
September 2014
Thank you for your contributions to Misplaced Pages. I noticed your recent edit to Aquiline nose does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, even if it is very brief, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history.
The edit summary appears in:
- User contributions
- Recent changes
- Watchlists
- Revision differences
- IRC channels
- Related changes
- New pages list and
- Article editing history
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! NeilN 23:41, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I added an explanation. This was mentioned by another user as well, where the term does not have any respectable evidence. None of the papers cited mention this term as an alternative.
- Did you actually read the cite I added and the talk page? --NeilN 23:55, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Aquiline nose shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Bbb23 (talk) 00:20, 20 September 2014 (UTC)