Misplaced Pages

:Templates for deletion/Log/2006 July 8: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Templates for deletion | Log Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 15:55, 8 July 2006 editKookykman (talk | contribs)1,207 edits →[]: Strong delete.← Previous edit Revision as of 15:57, 8 July 2006 edit undoPschemp (talk | contribs)Administrators20,819 edits closing, consensus for speedy keepNext edit →
Line 10: Line 10:
<!-- Please add the newest nominations to the top below this line --> <!-- Please add the newest nominations to the top below this line -->


<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #e3f9df; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. ''

The result of the debate was {{{1|}}} '''Speedy keep''' ] | ]
====]==== ====]====
There's no such thing as {{tl|unblock}} abuse; that template simply lets admins know that the user is requesting to be unblocked. Readding it for a second opinion is not abusive. --] (] - ]) 15:10, 8 July 2006 (UTC) There's no such thing as {{tl|unblock}} abuse; that template simply lets admins know that the user is requesting to be unblocked. Readding it for a second opinion is not abusive. --] (] - ]) 15:10, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
Line 28: Line 32:
*'''Speedy Keep''' per above--<b>]]<sup>(]ˑ])</sup></b> 15:49, 8 July 2006 (UTC) *'''Speedy Keep''' per above--<b>]]<sup>(]ˑ])</sup></b> 15:49, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
*'''Strongest delete I've ever given.''' Banned users talk pages should NEVER be blocked under normal circumstances. It's just not right. It's the only page they can still edit! The only way they can still comunnicate! By blocking that off, we're denying them the chance to defend themselves! - ]|<font color="black">]</font><font color="green">]</font> 15:55, 8 July 2006 (UTC) *'''Strongest delete I've ever given.''' Banned users talk pages should NEVER be blocked under normal circumstances. It's just not right. It's the only page they can still edit! The only way they can still comunnicate! By blocking that off, we're denying them the chance to defend themselves! - ]|<font color="black">]</font><font color="green">]</font> 15:55, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.</div>


====]==== ====]====

Revision as of 15:57, 8 July 2006

< July 7 July 9 >

July 8, 2006

NEW NOMINATIONS

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedy keep pschemp | talk

Template:Unblockabuse

There's no such thing as {{unblock}} abuse; that template simply lets admins know that the user is requesting to be unblocked. Readding it for a second opinion is not abusive. --SPUI (T - C) 15:10, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

  • As it stands as of the time of this comment, Delete. Luc "Somethingorother" French 15:34, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Speedy keep. The template is used when an individual uses the unblock template repeatedly, despite repeated refusals by different admins to unblock. Essjay (Talk • Connect) 15:35, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Speedy Keep (after edit conflict) Per Essjay. If you had been with me this morning you would have seen that this template serves a useful purpose. Your statement is hardly justifiable. One wouldn't userstand unless you handle unblocks, do RC patrol, etc etc.--Pilotguy 15:41, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
    • I understand perfectly what this is about - I've been on the other end of such a conflict (before this template was created). --SPUI (T - C) 15:43, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Speedy Keep - there are people abusing {{unblock}}, so there is a good reason for this template to exist. --WinHunter 15:43, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep There is such a thing as unblock abuse. I encounter it quite often. I see nothing wrong with protecting the page so the vandal will get bored and move on. -- Psy guy 15:44, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Speedy Keep (after edit conflicts) per above. G.He 15:45, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep per above. — FireFox 15:46, 08 July '06
  • Speedy Keep - {{unblock}} abuse is a relatively common trait among blatant vandals. (Those who deserve to be unblocked will get unblocked without any abuse anyway) There is little point in wasting our time dealing with such users. - Tangotango 15:48, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
    • Then don't waste your time. Simply leave the template and explain why you're not unblocking. Removing the template simply escalates it into a revert war. --SPUI (T - C) 15:52, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Speedy Keep per above--digital_me 15:49, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Strongest delete I've ever given. Banned users talk pages should NEVER be blocked under normal circumstances. It's just not right. It's the only page they can still edit! The only way they can still comunnicate! By blocking that off, we're denying them the chance to defend themselves! - Kookykman|(t)e 15:55, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Template:BAB-table

Orphaned after the discussion on Misplaced Pages talk:Autobahn infobox template. --SPUI (T - C) 12:18, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

Template:Swiss Confederation

Template:Swiss Confederation (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Contains the infobox from Switzerland, very unlikely to be used on any other page, and so useless. Schutz 09:32, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

Agreed - single use templates are bad. --SPUI (T - C) 15:37, 8 July 2006 (UTC)


Misplaced Pages:Templates for deletion/Log/2006 July 8: Difference between revisions Add topic