| Revision as of 07:40, 26 October 2014 editMehulWB (talk | contribs)172 edits →Comments by other users← Previous edit | Revision as of 07:41, 26 October 2014 edit undoMehulWB (talk | contribs)172 edits →Comments by other usersNext edit → | ||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
| *I am writing here only about Sockpuppet, not related to any COPYVIO,3RR or other issues. The user ] not using anykind of any other account at all. You can check this in your way. But practically he is very know to me. - ] (]|]) 07:14, 26 October 2014 (UTC) | *I am writing here only about Sockpuppet, not related to any COPYVIO,3RR or other issues. The user ] not using anykind of any other account at all. You can check this in your way. But practically he is very know to me. - ] (]|]) 07:14, 26 October 2014 (UTC) | ||
| ] contacted ] to favor him against the block. I guess in similar way, the other two accused are different individuals |
] contacted ] to favor him against the block. I guess in similar way, the other two accused are different individuals personally known to him and were asked to make the edits in favor of him from their own computers to avoid spi.--] (]) 07:40, 26 October 2014 (UTC) | ||
| ======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== | ======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== | ||
Revision as of 07:41, 26 October 2014
BengaliHindu
BengaliHindu (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: suspected
For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/BengaliHindu/Archive.
15 September 2014
– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Nirmalya1234 (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Abhijit4law (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
The user BengaliHindu is adding unproven allegation against Ahmed Hassan Imran who is a Rajya Sabha MP of India from West Bengal and editor of a Bengali daily newspaper. The allegations made by BengaliHindu were echo of a news story published on Anandabazar Patrika which didn't provide any proofs but referred only to allegations made by other politicians. Such allegations were challenged by Ahmed Hassan Imran himself and the reports are changing day by day in the newspapers. Posting those news stories from Anandabazar Patrika which is still unverified and is subject to court's verdict may damage his reputation and even harmful for a living person. I requested the user to wait till further reports and verification of those allegations but the user BengaliHindu continuously undid my edits consequently I also undid his edits then other editors Nirmalya1234 and Abhijit4law started making the same edits. I believe these 3 editors are the same person or the user BengaliHindu invited his friends to make those edits for him on . The article's history is relevant to this context. MehulWB (talk) 16:10, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
I would like to add here the recent edits on the article Ahmed Hassan Imran based on selectively choosed news sources by user Malapati. I found his last edit was made on 15 January 2013. User BengaliHindu stopped editing after my messages on the article's talk page but I guess user BengaliHindu might have contacted the user Malapati to make the edits for him. I may be wrong but this strikes me as a motivated edit to add only allegations against the living person. I requested several times on the article's talk page with news links to avoid adding poorly sourced contentious material about the living person and to wait till court's ruling but continuous similar edits are being made on the article from the user and unknown IP.MehulWB (talk) 17:31, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
- 5 of the 10 edits of Abhijit4law are clear copyright violations whereas BengaliHindu has no history of copyright violations as far I can see.Further he been editing for nearly 5 years with over 5600 Edits with no previous blocks.The other editor has Nirmalya1234 has only 3 edits 2 reverts and 3rd one copy paste text which an established editor will not do .But feel here BengaliHindu needed to be given WP:AGF here as the behavioral evidence is not very clear and have left note to Salvio giuliano . But the Blocking Admin is right and it is within his discretion.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 02:01, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
- I am writing here only about Sockpuppet, not related to any COPYVIO,3RR or other issues. The user user:BengaliHindu not using anykind of any other account at all. You can check this in your way. But practically he is very know to me. - Jayanta Nath (Talk|Contrb) 07:14, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
user:BengaliHindu contacted Jayanta Nath to favor him against the block. I guess in similar way, the other two accused are different individuals personally known to him and were asked to make the edits in favor of him from their own computers to avoid spi.--MehulWB (talk) 07:40, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
CheckUser requested - 
Self-endorsed by clerk for checkuser attention - Likely as not to be meatpuppetry, could a CU take a look please. Thanks, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 01:31, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
- Technically speaking, this is just a
Possible match. I'm afraid the connection will have to mainly be based on behavioural evidence. Salvio 10:13, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
- Indeffing socks and blocking master 72 hours. Closing.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 22:15, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
Categories: